░▒▓██▓▒░ HUSNG.com Open Thread (Videos and more) ░▒▓██▓▒░
04-13-2017
, 02:53 AM
04-28-2017
, 04:19 PM
Good evening (or day it depends) everyone 
I'm planning to moove from France to USA and I was searching this information that I never found :
What it is the limit of sit and goes Head's Up that you can find on the software pokerstars ?
In pokerstars.fr it only goes up to 1000 euros, so is there any 2000, 5000$ ?
Thank you very much, cheers.
I'm planning to moove from France to USA and I was searching this information that I never found :
What it is the limit of sit and goes Head's Up that you can find on the software pokerstars ?
In pokerstars.fr it only goes up to 1000 euros, so is there any 2000, 5000$ ?
Thank you very much, cheers.
05-30-2017
, 12:40 PM
I sent HUSNG.com an email the other day about an old Hyper Turbo pack I purchased a few years ago. I was trying to figure out how to redownload them. Help please
05-31-2017
, 05:31 AM
06-29-2017
, 10:49 AM
Ryan is wrong.
The numbers are shove EVs--in this case 3b shove. Note this is clearly written in the E-book--before every chart, and every EV he mentions, he tells you what he's computing. In this case just read this which comes right before the EVs you cite:
"Before that, let's do a quick exercise. Order these six hands from best expectation to worst expectation from jamming (ignore for a minute the expectation from flatting), and indicate whether or not you would guess that folding is a better option than jamming: Q8o, 54o, J5s, 76s, T9o, and K4o. When you have your answer, keep reading.
These hands play differently than you might think. When we try to come to conclusions about them at this stack depth, we will inevitably use what we know from other stack depths, and not all of them are relevant anymore.
K4o leads the way with -0.25bb from the start of the hand, a full ľ of a big blind better than folding. K4o is a borderline hand playing against a minraise 20bb deep, but once you get down to 13bb deep, our opponent is actually raise/calling with worse enough of the time that when you add in the fold equity from jamming, mucking is a large mistake against this opponent.
76s (-0.3bb), T9o (-0.4bb), and J5s (-0.5bb) are the next three on the list. 76s is 37% against the calling range, which is not bad at all after fold equity. T9o and J5s similarly do OK. Q8o (-0.6bb) lands at 5th on the list, which will be a surprisingly poor showing to many. The problem is that Q8o, unlike K4o, isn't getting any worse hands to call, but like K4o is dominated frequently, leading to 31.9% equity. Even 54o (-0.75) is not far behind."
Read more closely
The min-raise range and call 3b shove range are described above this section as well.
The numbers are shove EVs--in this case 3b shove. Note this is clearly written in the E-book--before every chart, and every EV he mentions, he tells you what he's computing. In this case just read this which comes right before the EVs you cite:
"Before that, let's do a quick exercise. Order these six hands from best expectation to worst expectation from jamming (ignore for a minute the expectation from flatting), and indicate whether or not you would guess that folding is a better option than jamming: Q8o, 54o, J5s, 76s, T9o, and K4o. When you have your answer, keep reading.
These hands play differently than you might think. When we try to come to conclusions about them at this stack depth, we will inevitably use what we know from other stack depths, and not all of them are relevant anymore.
K4o leads the way with -0.25bb from the start of the hand, a full ľ of a big blind better than folding. K4o is a borderline hand playing against a minraise 20bb deep, but once you get down to 13bb deep, our opponent is actually raise/calling with worse enough of the time that when you add in the fold equity from jamming, mucking is a large mistake against this opponent.
76s (-0.3bb), T9o (-0.4bb), and J5s (-0.5bb) are the next three on the list. 76s is 37% against the calling range, which is not bad at all after fold equity. T9o and J5s similarly do OK. Q8o (-0.6bb) lands at 5th on the list, which will be a surprisingly poor showing to many. The problem is that Q8o, unlike K4o, isn't getting any worse hands to call, but like K4o is dominated frequently, leading to 31.9% equity. Even 54o (-0.75) is not far behind."
Read more closely
The min-raise range and call 3b shove range are described above this section as well.
06-30-2017
, 02:15 AM
Hello,
thanks for your reply but this still did not answer my question. I wanted to know where do those hand EV values e.g. K4o has -0.25bb come from and how can I calculate them?
thanks for your reply but this still did not answer my question. I wanted to know where do those hand EV values e.g. K4o has -0.25bb come from and how can I calculate them?
Quote:
Ryan is wrong.
The numbers are shove EVs--in this case 3b shove. Note this is clearly written in the E-book--before every chart, and every EV he mentions, he tells you what he's computing. In this case just read this which comes right before the EVs you cite:
"Before that, let's do a quick exercise. Order these six hands from best expectation to worst expectation from jamming (ignore for a minute the expectation from flatting), and indicate whether or not you would guess that folding is a better option than jamming: Q8o, 54o, J5s, 76s, T9o, and K4o. When you have your answer, keep reading.
These hands play differently than you might think. When we try to come to conclusions about them at this stack depth, we will inevitably use what we know from other stack depths, and not all of them are relevant anymore.
K4o leads the way with -0.25bb from the start of the hand, a full ľ of a big blind better than folding. K4o is a borderline hand playing against a minraise 20bb deep, but once you get down to 13bb deep, our opponent is actually raise/calling with worse enough of the time that when you add in the fold equity from jamming, mucking is a large mistake against this opponent.
76s (-0.3bb), T9o (-0.4bb), and J5s (-0.5bb) are the next three on the list. 76s is 37% against the calling range, which is not bad at all after fold equity. T9o and J5s similarly do OK. Q8o (-0.6bb) lands at 5th on the list, which will be a surprisingly poor showing to many. The problem is that Q8o, unlike K4o, isn't getting any worse hands to call, but like K4o is dominated frequently, leading to 31.9% equity. Even 54o (-0.75) is not far behind."
Read more closely The min-raise range and call 3b shove range are described above this section as well.
The numbers are shove EVs--in this case 3b shove. Note this is clearly written in the E-book--before every chart, and every EV he mentions, he tells you what he's computing. In this case just read this which comes right before the EVs you cite:
"Before that, let's do a quick exercise. Order these six hands from best expectation to worst expectation from jamming (ignore for a minute the expectation from flatting), and indicate whether or not you would guess that folding is a better option than jamming: Q8o, 54o, J5s, 76s, T9o, and K4o. When you have your answer, keep reading.
These hands play differently than you might think. When we try to come to conclusions about them at this stack depth, we will inevitably use what we know from other stack depths, and not all of them are relevant anymore.
K4o leads the way with -0.25bb from the start of the hand, a full ľ of a big blind better than folding. K4o is a borderline hand playing against a minraise 20bb deep, but once you get down to 13bb deep, our opponent is actually raise/calling with worse enough of the time that when you add in the fold equity from jamming, mucking is a large mistake against this opponent.
76s (-0.3bb), T9o (-0.4bb), and J5s (-0.5bb) are the next three on the list. 76s is 37% against the calling range, which is not bad at all after fold equity. T9o and J5s similarly do OK. Q8o (-0.6bb) lands at 5th on the list, which will be a surprisingly poor showing to many. The problem is that Q8o, unlike K4o, isn't getting any worse hands to call, but like K4o is dominated frequently, leading to 31.9% equity. Even 54o (-0.75) is not far behind."
Read more closely
The min-raise range and call 3b shove range are described above this section as well.
06-30-2017
, 07:39 AM
08-20-2017
, 07:24 AM
