Open Side Menu Go to the Top
Register
7$ hyper - 88 first hand readless 7$ hyper - 88 first hand readless

10-31-2013 , 08:14 PM
    Poker Stars, $6.85 Buy-in (10/20 blinds) No Limit Hold'em Tournament, 2 Players
    Poker Tools Powered By Holdem Manager - The Ultimate Poker Software Suite.

    SB: 500 (25 bb)
    Hero (BB): 500 (25 bb)

    Preflop: Hero is BB with 8 8
    SB completes, Hero raises to 70, SB calls 50

    Flop: (140) 7 J 3 (2 players)
    Hero bets 70, SB raises to 420, [color="red"]Hero?
    7$ hyper - 88 first hand readless Quote
    10-31-2013 , 10:29 PM
    I would fold, you don't have a read of the villain he might have Jx or 7x or 3x and decided he was ahead of a lot of your cbet range, you still have left enough chips so it's a fold, get more hands with a villain and you will figure him out.

    Also your sizing should be more like 2.5x pot, remember he limped so kind of tells you he wants a cheap flop (a hint that he must be a station) with whatever hand he is holding and you are oop and you don't wanna give the villain a cheap flop.
    7$ hyper - 88 first hand readless Quote
    11-01-2013 , 10:33 AM
    call, i like your sizings too
    7$ hyper - 88 first hand readless Quote
    11-01-2013 , 04:06 PM
    Why call , you think jx isnt often enough to fold here?
    7$ hyper - 88 first hand readless Quote
    11-01-2013 , 04:30 PM
    I dont think i'm folding here. Why would he jam an Jx hand here ? I think most of the time he will be 3b most of his J here but no allin. But he will probably jam all his 2nd pairs and maybe some draws 89 9T 8T
    7$ hyper - 88 first hand readless Quote
    11-01-2013 , 05:25 PM
    Quote:
    Originally Posted by mickito
    I dont think i'm folding here. Why would he jam an Jx hand here ? I think most of the time he will be 3b most of his J here but no allin. But he will probably jam all his 2nd pairs and maybe some draws 89 9T 8T
    imo there are many more Jx than 7x in his range but dont think I could fold this but i dont think fold is bad
    7$ hyper - 88 first hand readless Quote
    11-01-2013 , 05:30 PM
    Quote:
    Originally Posted by none888
    imo there are many more Jx than 7x in his range
    that isn't a reason to fold in itself as we only need 35% equity.
    7$ hyper - 88 first hand readless Quote
    11-01-2013 , 05:37 PM
    Quote:
    Originally Posted by Armed_Robbery
    that isn't a reason to fold in itself as we only need 35% equity.
    ya, ofc, just saying that you will see more Jx here than 7x
    7$ hyper - 88 first hand readless Quote
    11-03-2013 , 03:20 AM
    Quote:
    Originally Posted by emotionx
    call, i like your sizings too
    +1
    7$ hyper - 88 first hand readless Quote
    11-07-2013 , 01:17 PM
    Im calling, you can reasonably eliminate JQ+ and J2-j6. So the only jacks here are really J7-J10. Shove to me looks a tad weak, def think this is 7x, 3x, or a weak SD a bigger % of time than Jx.
    7$ hyper - 88 first hand readless Quote
    11-07-2013 , 09:22 PM
    Readless, shove pre
    7$ hyper - 88 first hand readless Quote
    11-08-2013 , 09:54 AM
    Quote:
    Originally Posted by DeRaat
    Readless, shove pre
    - 1
    7$ hyper - 88 first hand readless Quote
    11-08-2013 , 10:14 AM
    Quote:
    Originally Posted by LOL@LivePoker
    - 1
    +1
    7$ hyper - 88 first hand readless Quote
    11-08-2013 , 10:17 AM
    =0
    7$ hyper - 88 first hand readless Quote
    11-08-2013 , 11:39 AM
    I dont think there are that many Jx in his shoving range, with a J he's gonna call and let you double barrel a considably amount of times, so, if im readless its a call for me.
    7$ hyper - 88 first hand readless Quote
    11-09-2013 , 10:54 AM
    It's not a fistpump, but it's a call
    7$ hyper - 88 first hand readless Quote
    11-10-2013 , 06:07 AM
    well played. it's annoying small raising pairs in limped pots readless, but that's better than going to sleep at night knowing you are a feeble bitch.
    7$ hyper - 88 first hand readless Quote

          
    m