Open Side Menu Go to the Top
Register
 deepstack, 2pair on river line check  deepstack, 2pair on river line check

02-22-2011 , 06:43 PM
First hand of match so no reads on villain

Is this spewy or standard ?


Full Tilt Poker No Limit Hold'em Tournament - t10.00/t20.00 Blinds - 2 players
The Official 2+2 Hand Converter By DeucesCracked Poker Videos

BB: t3000.00 150 BBs
Hero (BTN/SB): t3000.00 150 BBs

Pre Flop: (t30) Hero is BTN/SB with A 7
Hero raises to t60, BB calls t40

Flop: (t120) Q A 6 (2 players)
BB checks, Hero bets t80.00, BB calls t80

Turn: (t280) 4 (2 players)
BB checks, Hero bets t175.00, BB calls t175

River: (t630) 7 (2 players)
BB checks, Hero bets t400.00, BB raises to t1600, Hero raises to t2685, BB calls t1085
 deepstack, 2pair on river line check Quote
02-22-2011 , 07:34 PM
I would certainly not shove over his river c/r. Maybe call, but his raise makes me want to puke.
 deepstack, 2pair on river line check Quote
02-22-2011 , 10:20 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by alexDJI
I would certainly not shove over his river c/r. Maybe call, but his raise makes me want to puke.
this
 deepstack, 2pair on river line check Quote
02-23-2011 , 12:55 AM
The first hand at $5s, I'd call this but not fistpump or anything. No point in shoving though, there's like 0 draw that got there on the river and his raise screams 2 pair or a slowplayed set.
 deepstack, 2pair on river line check Quote
02-23-2011 , 03:59 AM
River shove is spew, everything else is fine. Pretty sure his c/r range on this board is ahead of you, but you have odds to call vs. worse 2pair. Given that his c/r range is ahead of you shoving is really bad.
 deepstack, 2pair on river line check Quote
02-23-2011 , 01:41 PM
I'd jam really, even if he plays 100% of his set combos like this we're still ahead if we add 7x 2pair hands, tho I don't expect to have much more than 55-60% equity vs his c/r range
 deepstack, 2pair on river line check Quote
02-23-2011 , 01:50 PM
river is ridiculously close, he likely doesn't have better 2 pair and almost definitely doesn't have a straight, so we lose to a handful of sets (77 makes the most sense) that hand a ton of patience and took an extremely good line. on the other hand, we beat an overplayed Q7/67. i'd absolutely never fold, shoving seems a tad thin though i don't hate it.
 deepstack, 2pair on river line check Quote
02-23-2011 , 01:54 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by JSpazz
I'd jam really, even if he plays 100% of his set combos like this we're still ahead if we add 7x 2pair hands, tho I don't expect to have much more than 55-60% equity vs his c/r range
you're insane. Jamming there is almost never going to be profitable. He could have floated 35s with the backdoor flushdraw on the flop, and he's almost certainly not going to play A/Q64 this way. What are you hoping for? That he has like Q7 or like KT? I don't think he's going to c/r those hands on the river (maybe KT but I reaaaally doubt it).
 deepstack, 2pair on river line check Quote
02-23-2011 , 06:32 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by alexDJI
you're insane. Jamming there is almost never going to be profitable. He could have floated 35s with the backdoor flushdraw on the flop, and he's almost certainly not going to play A/Q64 this way. What are you hoping for? That he has like Q7 or like KT? I don't think he's going to c/r those hands on the river (maybe KT but I reaaaally doubt it).
this is probably much closer than you think, although i thought this was an easy flat as well.
think about the combo's that are possible for him to have. there are at the most 6 backdoor straights and 18 set combos, while some of them are highly unlikely. he might have AQ also but most players will 3bet this or c/r the flop. 67 and Q7 alone are 12 combos, now add in some A4 and A6 combos and it gets really close.

i still believe this is a flat, just because it seems like we are as close to 50% equity against is value range as we can get. folding would be absurd though.
 deepstack, 2pair on river line check Quote
02-23-2011 , 06:41 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by ohly
this is probably much closer than you think, although i thought this was an easy flat as well.
think about the combo's that are possible for him to have. there are at the most 6 backdoor straights and 18 set combos, while some of them are highly unlikely. he might have AQ also but most players will 3bet this or c/r the flop. 67 and Q7 alone are 12 combos, now add in some A4 and A6 combos and it gets really close.

i still believe this is a flat, just because it seems like we are as close to 50% equity against is value range as we can get. folding would be absurd though.
ok now tell me how many combos of weaker hands he has with exactly this line, compared to how many combos of stronger hands he has. Most 2 pairs we get value from flat the river.
 deepstack, 2pair on river line check Quote
02-23-2011 , 06:44 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by alexDJI
ok now tell me how many combos of weaker hands he has with exactly this line, compared to how many combos of stronger hands he has. Most 2 pairs we get value from flat the river.
how could we possibly know that? with reads i would agree, but readless i don't. we might as well assume that he 3bets AA,QQ,AQ a hundred percent of the time, never does a horrible float with just backdoor flushdraw and backdoor straight draw and that he folds 44 on the flop, 77 on the turn and c/r 66 otf. here we go, he has no value range that beats us.
 deepstack, 2pair on river line check Quote
02-23-2011 , 07:13 PM
well in that case, I think you can assign him a nice little range and stove it yea?
 deepstack, 2pair on river line check Quote

      
m