why we should do this ? we cant share 100s lobby with this ppl, strong 100s guys should do his

list of 100$s anyone? thanks in advance.

Why is excel-sheet blocked with code @100s?

IMPORTANT NOTE:

100s division decided to take back the "Splitting Sitlist Games" rules, which have been announced on page 3. The "Game Requesting" rules will still be applicable.

+1

Well done guys.

Question is still of interest; just want to keep my notes up to date and don't know why 100s guys do block their sheet and 60s don't.. Tx by the way for the update of member list in the post a few days ago.

We dont update our googlesheet anymore. Everybody that is not in 100s division or higher is on our sitlist by default. An updated list of our members can be found here:

https://docs.google.com/spreadsheets...re0/edit#gid=0

Tx Choqi

Why theese players were removed. Sifosis for eg.? Maybe he moved up or hasnt played for a while?

he left voluntarily

I been seeing him at 50nl tables recently

100s division decided to change their rules regarding the amount of tables sitlist players have to play:


3rd Table Rules

- Members of 100s division are able to demand a 3rd table against upmoving players.
- Members of 100s division are allowed to decline, if an upmoving player denies a 3rd table.
- Based on our Infraction for Sitlist Player Rules (http://forumserver.twoplustwo.com/18...78/index3.html), members of 100s division are able to give an infractionvote, if an upmoving player denies a 3rd table.

When linking another post on 2p2, it is recommended to user the #number on the right side at the top - like this I guess is what you mean to link: http://forumserver.twoplustwo.com/sh...8&postcount=33 Should you wish to link to a whole thread, but land on the post in context - click the #number then copy the link from the top right of it, for example: http://forumserver.twoplustwo.com/18.../#post43870138

For me your link just goes to the OP. An "index" link like you used will go all sorts of different places depending on a user's "posts per page" setting in their options.


Not mentioned above, I assume this works in reverse also? Members must now accept request for 3rd table, or face kicking?

Thx for the advise, I didnt know that! I meant this post:
http://forumserver.twoplustwo.com/sh...8&postcount=33


No, our members will still have to play 2 tables, but they dont have to accept a request for a 3rd table. Before we implemented these rules, sitlist players were able to choose all the circumstances for battling members of 100s divisions. They can sit us during our sessions and they can schedule games against us. It was frustrating for many of our members that they had to adjust their grind to the wishes of sitlist players. Therefore, we think it is fair that our members can choose, if they want to play 2 or 3 tables.

I fail to see why it should be fair that division members can choose if they want to play 2 or 3 tables.

The argument that sitlisters can sit cartel members during your sessions and can schedule games vs them is not a valid arguement imo because to get into the cartel you have to play the cartel obviously

While I usually agree with most of the division rules I think this one maybe thought of wrongly....Here is why:
Being in the division gives u certain perks and it comes with certain responsibilities
The perks are the right to play fish but you only get that if you follow the responsibility to the division which is to defend the lobby
When u are a division member your primary goal is lobby defending.....So defend the lobby vs these guys who you have told specifically to play vs you to have any chance to being a division member.....
If you do not like defending them then perhaps the division is not for you

You made all the rules for entering the division; the least that you can allow for these triers is for them to set when they play you.....
It seems that every time a positive move is made by the division, within a few days something new gets changed that completely puts a negative vibe out there and kills all the good that you are trying to do....
Just be aware of how things and the division is perceived.....

How does the division get what they want while also giving the rest what they want in the most fair way possible? That is the question that needs to be figured out over anything else..... Once that is done, the rest is just noise...........

more tables means usually a smaller possible edge. so i think it will be even harder for the sitlist players to get in.
and i cant see anything fair that the divison can decide on how many tables they want to play!
that rule is unfair for sure!

Hi everyone. Few days ago I asked a cartel member what happened after 10k games (I just assumed, that the count would start as "last 10k games" or something like that).
Today he confirmed the general opinion is that after 10k, you get a reset and you start from zero, which doesnt make much sense in my opinion.
I mean, im only 6,6k games in @ -1.4, which is far from reaching the 10k games, but still, I would like people's opinion on this, do you guys think this is actually fair?

Thanks!

Well it's better than giving only one shot and then saying that you newer can apply again. I think they didn't make deep thoughts about that and that rule can change. But if say I try to battle to 100s division in 4k I didn't succeed having like -2,5% EV and give up. Then like learn coach etc. And come after half year with new strategies, deeper game understanding, well coached etc. And after 4k games I have +1% EV. Do those both tries has to be combined and counted like 8k games with like -1,5% Despite that now I`m completely different player who is able to win against certain regs? I think division members are logical men and would considerate every circumstance and make logical and right decision despite that it confronts with strict rules. Ofc there will always be some guys you know "rules are rules" and then you have to play till 10k and then after reset try it again.

So I think it will be the point of view from which you look. You can say rules are rules and don't give a f... Or you can just consider all circumstances and make logical decision. Depends on leaders...

Although this may have changed, in the past it was said that once you hit 10,000 games it was your most recent rolling 10,000 games.

For example, after 10,500 games, your first 500 wouldn't count, only the most recent 10,000. After 12,000 games, the first 2,000 wouldn't count, etc.

Right when this division started i played alot against it. Back then there wasnt any EV requirements so most of the time i grinded several members at the same time on multiple tables. Therefore my EV results so far aren't very good (a bit less than breakeven in chips). This makes it very hard for me to get the required results.

I think the only fair way, is for me to not count the results from before the EV requirements got available, but i wanted to ask in here first.

^ seems like a fair argument to me

+1, I think this would be really fair