I saw what happened to a recent poster who was asking for too much markup, so I thought I'd seek some opinions before I make a selling shares thread for the WSOP. I think this is OK here - apologies if in the wrong place.
I'm kind of an interesting case. I've crushed online for 300k+ lifetime with a graph that just goes straight up and am up 180k in the past four months, currently 7th on scope's any game any stakes leaderboard for 2011 (almost all from Heads Up). However, my MTT experience is currently very limited (only one online cash for ~10k) and my live experience is low as well. I'll be playing a very soft schedule as listed
here with just the lowest buy-in events and the main event. Given how well I've done at mid-high stakes sngs, I'm planning to ask for 1.28 in prelim events and 1.35 for the main - is this within the realm of reason?
I have plenty of references as to my character/that I don't do things half-assed. I know people have a lot of opinions about markup, but I take the side that the player's travel/hotel expenses don't matter in the slightest, and that it's all about the edge in the actual tournament and what markup they can sell at that makes it still +EV enough for investors to want to invest. But I know people can get upset and feel that respected members of the community are trying to trick people into -EV bets by charging too high markup and I want no part of that. So I'd like to know ahead of time if that's what it's going to be seen like, or if this is a reasonable line I should be fine throwing out there.