--Josse said from his glass house

Assuming you're a friend of his and he told you to post this or just lol

Never met him. Don't know him. In fact, I posted that prior to even watching the last 2 episodes of the WSOP ME. After watching it I'm mad I didn't get him at 1.8. Lon Mceachern called him a "legitimate powerhouse". Sounds like everyone in this thread was wrong about him.

Which is a worse value? Buying a great player at 1.8 or buying you at 1.1? Or to reword the question, is staking a great player at 1.8 at least break even?

BTW, a lot of claims ITT but no math presented to back up these wild assertions. Seems more likely that everyone just wants to troll pile on and bully another forum member.

I'll answer it for you. Buying a great player at 1.8 is much worse than buying me at 1.1 AINEC...but that isn't what some of the peoples' points are in this thread that you appear to be missing.

Do you really think staking a great player at 1.8 is break even over the long run or even close?

Assuming it isn't profitable, how is that any different than the rest of these jokesters selling action at 1.1?

The guy was wearing a "what would Phil do" shirt. What do you expect?

What a thread. Selling 5% just makes no sense

Watch his bust out hand when it airs. It will make you regret passing on this great deal

Highroller got 16 entries including re-entries

What are the OPs MTT results ? Probably pretty high with the recent score. So what if 1.8 isn't profitable, isn't being part of the power team more important?

Pretty sure you're all getting trolled by NLAP and Relentless.

Correct me if I'm wrong. His 1.8 markup means he is estimating his roi to be 160%. Always thought roi was supposed to split by seller and investor.

If a top pro was selling to WPT Borgata Main and the WPT Maryland Main sure you could justify a 1.8 markup for some of best regs in the field. It probably wouldn't sell very well but it is fair.

However, a fake highroller that is going to get about 2 tables with reentries and some of the better east coast regs. (zinno, darren, merson, charder, etc) Op roi can't be higher than 20-30% at best.

Furthermore, op's arrogance at not justifying markup and then stating he was selling 5% (wtf) makes it pretty easy to hate on.

I thought the OP was being sarcastic with the 5% comment.

FYP

Most packages on this site are unprofitable and don't get all this abuse, why is this one any different?

I don't know why i'm posting this, but think everyone should be scrutinized or nobody should.

I agree on the point where you say all piss takers should be scrutinized somewhat, but the difference between this package and other packages that do take the piss ,this one is on a different level

The difference between this package and other packages on the forums is this guy is trying to give it to you without lube, at least the other guys lube up somewhat

I was being serious, but only bc someone bought "as much as I wanted to sell" and I had already made this thread.
High roller wasn't what I expected so I didn't play. But from the buzz in the room I thought it would be a good tournament.

yeah i get that, i just think all scams should be treated the same almost regardless of the level of scam

Why is the term "scam" being used here? How was this a scam?

How the hell is it not a scam?

Im not saying this is or isn't a scam, but offering any investment opportunity that is unprofitable classes as a scam for me.

People often overestimate their edge and more often are being careless/delusional than trying to scam people out of money.

Yeah you're right my bad, i meant to say something along these lines.

I need to stay away from these discussions (as should many others).

Just lol at this