Open Side Menu Go to the Top
Register
HSNL Cash Pro Selling For WPT Events HSNL Cash Pro Selling For WPT Events

10-02-2015 , 09:59 PM
10-02-2015 , 10:12 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by feel wrath
Just lol at this
Sigh, yes
10-02-2015 , 11:16 PM
Lol 1.8 is that a typo
10-03-2015 , 12:24 AM
Furthest thing from a scam
10-03-2015 , 06:27 AM
This thread makes me hate the Internet. You're the man Kydd, keep killing it
10-03-2015 , 09:55 AM
Why isn't this thread closed yet? Mods?
10-03-2015 , 11:58 AM
Mods are probably dreading scrubbing this thread to remove all the unnecessary hate that OP received from the forum trolls.
10-03-2015 , 12:12 PM
don't really care about OP and the comments in particular, but it has turned into spamming..
10-03-2015 , 07:46 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by Luck3yChance
Correct me if I'm wrong. His 1.8 markup means he is estimating his roi to be 160%. Always thought roi was supposed to split by seller and investor.
I assure you marketplace regs like Aguskb are not sharing half their roi with their investors. He's probably not even sharing 10% of his roi, lol.

I miss Giffordonian too.
10-04-2015 , 12:28 AM
a lot of the sellers don't even beat their MU
10-04-2015 , 03:50 AM
Quote:
Originally Posted by OMGClayDol
a lot of the sellers don't even beat their MU
What....you mean tournament players aren't profitable without bad investors staking them?

Wow. That's controversial!
10-05-2015 , 11:59 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by OMGClayDol
a lot of the sellers don't even beat their MU
True in some cases for sure but there only ever really by a small margin, this guy takes the biscuit!!
11-07-2015 , 10:39 AM
I haven't been on this forum for a while, so I missed this thread. Chad tried to use his recent exposure to take advantage of someone who doesn't understand tournament investing and I'm very happy that it didn't work for him. It's good that the mods didn't delete the posts saying what a joke this package was. People who invest in the marketplace should always be allowed to express their opinions if they think a package is very unprofitable.
11-07-2015 , 03:53 PM
Hasn't other big hitters like Galen Hall and Timex done auctions of % pieces of themselves during WSOP where buyers paid over 1.8 MU when the bidding was over? Does that make them scammers as well? Not saying this package was a great deal, but if Chad wants to try to sell at that level of MU it is his right and I think eight pages of trolling is kind of overboard.
11-07-2015 , 06:01 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by LotGrinder
Hasn't other big hitters like Galen Hall and Timex done auctions of % pieces of themselves during WSOP where buyers paid over 1.8 MU when the bidding was over? Does that make them scammers as well? Not saying this package was a great deal, but if Chad wants to try to sell at that level of MU it is his right and I think eight pages of trolling is kind of overboard.
Hi chad
11-07-2015 , 07:27 PM
No bro.

I just don't get iRate at things that should not make me iRate when I internet.

A lot of people in this thread need to take a few deep breaths and slowly step away from the keyboard.
11-07-2015 , 08:19 PM
I think it's because guys like Galen and Timex have verifiable results and/or have others with verifiable results that would vouch for their perceived profitability on non-standard marketplace markups. Where as in OP's case he's almost essentially saying "Trust me" or leveraging a very limited sample (i.e ME run) to charge something out of the norm.

Maybe he's truly worth it, but I can see how this irks a MP that can get taken advantage of very easily.
11-07-2015 , 08:52 PM
Aren't most of the players in the MP losing players? What's the big deal? Degens don't like spending money on high markups to feed their addictions?
11-07-2015 , 10:30 PM
MP is just pissed their lottery tickets got more expensive
11-07-2015 , 10:50 PM
hey this thread is back.... greeeaaaaat
11-09-2015 , 11:45 AM
Quote:
Originally Posted by fakelogic
I think it's because guys like Galen and Timex have verifiable results and/or have others with verifiable results that would vouch for their perceived profitability on non-standard marketplace markups. Where as in OP's case he's almost essentially saying "Trust me" or leveraging a very limited sample (i.e ME run) to charge something out of the norm.

Maybe he's truly worth it, but I can see how this irks a MP that can get taken advantage of very easily.
his call off with 44 was atrocious..would never buy
11-09-2015 , 12:11 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by bikram
his call off with 44 was atrocious..would never buy
Yet Turyanksy makes some questionable plays and utilizes some questionable logic and yet you defend him because he crushes cash. I hope you would never buy him either.
11-25-2015 , 04:31 AM
Hey chad,

I noticed you mentioned you wouldn't even sell for the cash games you regularly play in at Maryland live ( at 2.8 MU). Care to comment on the various methods you have for keeping ppl with working brains out of the game and/or how you manipulate the lists? Or maybe even your top 3 methods for greasing the floor? Would love to hear your thoughts. Also, any tips on ur excellent teaching methods of how to 4b all in with no FE with 33 deep in the main and consequently lighting thousands of $ in EV on fire would be greatly appreciated. Thanks!
11-26-2015 , 04:05 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by ucftennis12
Hey chad,

I noticed you mentioned you wouldn't even sell for the cash games you regularly play in at Maryland live ( at 2.8 MU). Care to comment on the various methods you have for keeping ppl with working brains out of the game and/or how you manipulate the lists? Or maybe even your top 3 methods for greasing the floor? Would love to hear your thoughts. Also, any tips on ur excellent teaching methods of how to 4b all in with no FE with 33 deep in the main and consequently lighting thousands of $ in EV on fire would be greatly appreciated. Thanks!
10% please
11-26-2015 , 05:31 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by cicakman
10% please
Can 30% pls

Sent from my SM-G900V using 2+2 Forums

      
m