Open Side Menu Go to the Top
FAQ Today's Posts Search Twitter Discord
Register
Should we deviate from pio here? Should we deviate from pio here?
Post Reply Subscribe
...
07-05-2020 , 12:06 PM
#1
iwillabuseyou
View Profile Send Message Find Posts By iwillabuseyou Find Threads By iwillabuseyou
stranger
Join Date: Jun 2020 Posts: 4
Pio plays super passive and checks back 85% on some boards for example K-7-7 btn vs bb. In practice population isn't finding 64o x/rs vs a 1/3 cbet. Should we just over cbet boards like this if betting and checking is the same ev?

Should we deviate from pio here? Quote
07-05-2020 , 04:04 PM
#2
LiveMTTDegen
View Profile Find Posts By LiveMTTDegen Find Threads By LiveMTTDegen
banned
Join Date: Jan 2020 Posts: 514
Quote:
In practice population isn't finding 64o x/rs vs a 1/3 cbet.
You should be a wolf and find 64o with a x/rs vs a 1/3 cbet by players who think the same as you.
Should we deviate from pio here? Quote
07-05-2020 , 06:43 PM
#3
iwillabuseyou
View Profile Send Message Find Posts By iwillabuseyou Find Threads By iwillabuseyou
stranger
Join Date: Jun 2020 Posts: 4
lmfao
Should we deviate from pio here? Quote
07-05-2020 , 06:50 PM
#4
deuceblocker
View Profile Send Message Find Posts By deuceblocker Find Threads By deuceblocker
veteran
Join Date: Apr 2019 Posts: 3,383
I have been x/red a lot on paired boards lately. I know they are probably FOS, but I don't know what to do.
Should we deviate from pio here? Quote
07-05-2020 , 10:00 PM
#5
lolposting2016
View Profile Send Message Find Posts By lolposting2016 Find Threads By lolposting2016
veteran
Join Date: Aug 2016 Posts: 2,149
The easy way to answer this is to node lock and remove a bunch of these xrs and modify the strategy to something much more passive that’s in line with how recreationals /fun players are approaching this spot. Ime you can bet a lot more than what the equilibrium shows here and it’s going to work fine.
But if you are playing someone who’s good then if you are getting too often you’re going to be better off sticking to the gto strategy
Should we deviate from pio here? Quote
07-06-2020 , 04:57 PM
#6
3for3poker
View Profile Send Message Find Posts By 3for3poker Find Threads By 3for3poker
old hand
Join Date: Jun 2015 Posts: 1,505
Quote:
Originally Posted by deuceblocker
I have been x/red a lot on paired boards lately. I know they are probably FOS, but I don't know what to do.
To borrow a phrase from Hamilton:

Call more. Fold less. Most players size small enough in their check raises that you need to defend a lot.
Should we deviate from pio here? Quote
07-06-2020 , 11:02 PM
#7
lolposting2016
View Profile Send Message Find Posts By lolposting2016 Find Threads By lolposting2016
veteran
Join Date: Aug 2016 Posts: 2,149
Quote:
Originally Posted by 3for3poker
To borrow a phrase from Hamilton:

Call more. Fold less. Most players size small enough in their check raises that you need to defend a lot.
No no no
The reason we are checking back so much on this board is you need to protect your range against this kind of aggressive strategy the answer isn’t to just go stationing off bc you think villain is fos
Should we deviate from pio here? Quote
07-07-2020 , 01:31 AM
#8
3for3poker
View Profile Send Message Find Posts By 3for3poker Find Threads By 3for3poker
old hand
Join Date: Jun 2015 Posts: 1,505
Quote:
Originally Posted by lolposting2016
No no no
The reason we are checking back so much on this board is you need to protect your range against this kind of aggressive strategy the answer isn’t to just go stationing off bc you think villain is fos
I wasn’t talking about the OP decision to bet the flop. I was responding to a different post where hero was getting check raised a lot on paired boards.
Should we deviate from pio here? Quote
Post Reply Subscribe
...
      
Feedback is used for internal purposes. LEARN MORE
Contact Us Privacy Statement TOS
Top
Powered by:  Hand2Note
Copyright ©2008-2022, Hand2Note Interactive LTD
m