villain had 26% river aggression which generally means he's in between value and bluffing for river actions. from this session he seemed to be playing straight forward. overall his stats were of the TAG profile.
I always seem to be getting myself in weird spots when i go for value in these situations.
b/c, looks like a bluff to me. You want his AK and weaker ace and smaller pocket pairs to hero as he is rarely ever betting those and almost always getting a free show down
Super thin valuerange obv and uber exploitable but how often is a random tag bluffing here in that spot
99% of people call aq here bcs of a thinkingprocess like sou thats why noone is ever bluffing in a spot like this
y not sure tbh that's why i think c/c might be best line. let him bluff, get to see showdwon, and not get bluffed out by having to b/f. although i could b/c just seems like i'm losing in these spots so often lately.
thanks for the responses
b/c, looks like a bluff to me. You want his AK and weaker ace and smaller pocket pairs to hero as he is rarely ever betting those and almost always getting a free show down
I agreed.
AA/KK betting turn or calling river, if he puts us on Tx.
QQ only makes sense.
I think b/c > c/c are both good depending on opp's river tendencies. But for sure folding seems like a mistake.
CaliStyle's read seems logical: he's really only repping QQ (or a strangely played 22 or 33 which are unlikely seen as though a decent opp should try to get value from FDs and protect vs Tx-hands ott).
I also think you can exclude AA and KK since it'd be stupid to check those on the turn and raise them otr so basically that only leaves AQ and bluffs in his range.