Quote:
Originally Posted by wowsooooted
8x,6x,4x, 22-77, weak/some queens
Turn seems like clear bet, dunno why we would not take our option to semi-bluff and try to win the pot x2 ways instead of taking a passive line. Balance in general is an overstreched concept imo, in real word scenarios other factors rank higher in terms of importance.
In any turn spot where flop checks through in a heads up pot, hero needs to work out:
Which hands lead
Which hands x/c
Which hands x/f
And maybe
Which hands x/r
But if you don't develop a x/c range and only lead or x/f, your strategy has a gaping hole in it.
The reason you should take a more passive line with your worst pairs is that they are less likely to get called by worse hands and more likely to fold out hands we beat which might look to bluff. Leading 4x implies you're threshold to lead is any other hand that is > 4x. That means you're checking range is going to look like a piece of ****. You might not care about balance, but this is a pretty easy exploit which will open up.
Also, it's worth noting that hero isn't sure what to do on the best case scenario for us (rivering trips). On most other rivers which aren't an A or a 4, which is like 89% of all rivers, you're now out of position in a dumb spot because your threshold to probe turn was too low by betting any hand >4x. On the river, this current leading strategy raises many questions:
If you didn't improve, what are you doing with other draws which bricked?
Which bluffs do you select?
What do all those pairs that you bet on the turn do, do they bet river again or do they x/c or x/f?
And as a general rule, if you find yourself in a lot of situations where you bet turn as BB and get called by the pre flop raiser after flop checks through and are kind of lost on the river, it's likely you're threshold to probe turn is too low and your bet is too thin.
Leading pairs to x/f the next street isn't going to be something I can get on board with.