Open Side Menu Go to the Top
Register
Estimate # of Regs? And estimate ROI distribution amongst Regs? Estimate # of Regs? And estimate ROI distribution amongst Regs?

06-27-2021 , 11:40 AM
https://forumserver.twoplustwo.com/1...ation-1791919/

Hey everyone, maybe my question will get some traction here.

What are your estimates for the answer to this question?

"What's a good estimate for the number of players who take the game at least semi-serious in some formal manner (casino, online, serious home game, etc) i.e. a "Reg"?"

I think that's a pretty good definition of a "Reg" (just because someone plays a lot doesn't make them good, so I don't think being skillful should matter whether or not you're a reg).


In today's environment, what do you think is the cumulative distribution for how many regs achieve each of these ROIs? (My personal guesses included below).

1. <=0% ROI (I guess 98% or so of regs never do better than breakeven?)
2. 0%<ROI<=10% (I'd guess maybe 1% of the population of regs ever does better than 10%. Agree or no?)
3. >=20% ROI (my guess is maybe something like 1/500 regs can achieve ROIs that high. Too high or too low do you think?)
Estimate # of Regs? And estimate ROI distribution amongst Regs? Quote
08-05-2021 , 02:34 PM
You know who i get to go all-in in tournaments with the worst, stupidest ****? Regs. Them and the bad players. I get people committing against me so bad, all the time. I don't got the mental illness i'd need to believe this. LOL. but that chart stuff can be money. When they're being told how to play, you get stupid **** that must work out for you ON THE BENJAMIN SCALE EVENTUALLY?!?!
Estimate # of Regs? And estimate ROI distribution amongst Regs? Quote
08-07-2021 , 06:04 AM
who knows no one has all the stats. only the sites have these stats unless a site is datamining but after opr stop no more info
Estimate # of Regs? And estimate ROI distribution amongst Regs? Quote
08-26-2021 , 09:10 PM
you can find it with H2N
Estimate # of Regs? And estimate ROI distribution amongst Regs? Quote

      
m