Quote:
Originally Posted by poloplaya1414
Run it in the solver dude if you’re so confident.
I did. It's raising stronger FDs more than weaker FDs. It's calling weakest at 90%+ freq like 53 85 84 etc
edit: I've runned it for multiple stacksizes, obv it's calling lil bit more of the NFDs at this depth (AJhh-A8hh are calls 100%) but it's pretty similar.
Anyway, this is not something worth of dispute because players are constructing their ranges differently here. I'm fairly positive that from theoretical standpoint it's a lot better to raise stronger FDs simply because they have a lot more equity/implied odds than weaker ones. That raising weakest because they have less SDV way of thinking is so 2014 imo. For example we call A6hh turn is brick, x x , river is brick we x villain bets 40%, are you calling A6hh in a spot where villian can vbet very thinly/bluff with stronger hand ? Where is your SDV ? SDV in these spots is so overrated imo. Your strategy is obviously profitable in todays games but EVs of those things run pretty close, its not like you said :
CALL STRONGEST RAISE WEAKEST IS THE WAY TO GO !!!!!!!!1111111 . Due to simplicity I also agree with your strat but don't be so exclusive just because you're doing it so and it's (i assume) going well for you, it doesn't mean it wouldn't go better if you did it other way.
Last edited by nomalice; 07-29-2018 at 05:15 AM.