Quote:
Originally Posted by ledn
I was thinking that we want to flat to induce sb and bb calls and increase the % of knocking him out. And no one is really incentivized to bluff or deny equity postflop.
But the more I think about it, the chip leader in the bb doesn't really care about a pay jump and is possibly incentivized to delay it as much as possible because of the ICM pressure you and especially the 2nd stack are in.
This could easily have been true. I was fortunate it wasn't or rather that the BB didn't have a real hand.
The BB hadn't 3-bet basically all day. He was calling a lot of raises in position. And a few out of position. So I guess it didn't occur to me that he might 3-bet to potentially prolong the match. But again I wasn't thinking too much either...
His goal ultimately was to chop at the earliest time (which is not something I knew at the time). So I was very lucky that he wanted to expedite the elimination of the very short stack. BB called with 85o and ultimately won the hand with 2 pair.
Before the flop the BB checked in the dark which gave me the emphatic indication that he wanted to eliminate the short stack. I missed the 875 flop entirely except for a possible gutter. On the turn BB led with a significant bet and I folded.
BB won the hand against a single pair of 7's.
Quote:
Originally Posted by 3for3poker
I am flatting here, for sure. If someone else wants to isolate him, that is fine, I'll take my EV from that, and just fold. Perhaps I am a nit/ICM whore, but so be it.
Congratulations on your top 4 finish, MrRick! (A little Twitter research shows you were 3d, well done)
Thanks.
It was a strange final table in that there was almost always two short stacks. I was fairly card dead so it didn't matter that much but the guy to my left liked to play a lot of hands and ultimately lost his 2nd place status due to the volatility and the CL propensity to call in position virtually all the time.
I was originally going to put this in the Bubblebust thread about always coming close (as a don't quit 5 seconds before the miracle post) but I was curious about how badly I played this hand in terms of hurting my chances to win.
Until I was in about 15th place I had been all in (or virtually all-in) five times over the two days. The chances of survival to that point was about 30%. One of all-ins was a flip (AK vs 77). Then it unraveled as I got it in bad (A4s vs QQ with 14 blinds) and survived. I also got it in good twice for significant double ups but only at 70% each time. At 5th place my AQo ran into AKs SB vs BB and again I got lucky to survive. By the time we were four way my total chances of survival was down to 1.5%.
The ultimate irony was that I refused a deal because the 2nd place guy wanted me to take $2,000 less than what the Venetian calculated as the chop. So taking a page from Greg Raymer's book I refused the unfavorable deal and proceeded to lose the next hand where I was in the BB with AQs vs ATo (2nd place guy who raised and then called my 10bb shove). Lol. I wasn't even upset because I knew I had been lucky to get there. And I had been able to use the bathroom while the Venetian was calculating the chop.
I think I played good for the most part, in large part due to the posts of all of you. Forcing me to think carefully about opponent's bet sizing, opposing ranges, GTO play from younger guys, making uncomfortable calls, what would a solver say?, etc. I also wore a pair of new Blue Shark poker glasses prior to most flops, turns and rivers in order to pick up tells by not looking at the cards but focusing on other players in the hand. Lol again (I didn't pick up tells - mostly). But I did find out that there were players not wearing glasses that were doing the same thing! So I felt glad that any time my pupils dilated within my blue eyes, I was not giving off that tell.
Also a special thanks to JKPoker who inspired me to go to Vegas in the first place with his posts of recent tourneys there.