Open Side Menu Go to the Top
Register
109$ turn sizing? 109$ turn sizing?

11-24-2018 , 04:03 PM
***** Hand History for Game 17990106348 *****
NL Texas Hold'em $109 USD Buy-in Trny:189716075 Level:14 Blinds-Antes(850/1.7K -220) - Saturday, November 24, 21:28:15 EET 2018
Table KO Series #33-H. $100K Gtd [8-Max] (189716075) Table #39 (Real Money)
Seat 2 is the button
Total number of players : 8/8
Seat 3: A_Risky_Nit ( 97,362 )
Seat 6: SmashUrGrandma ( 316,551 )
Seat 2: bezuprechni ( 169,766 )
Seat 5: ddaubar ( 136,349 )
Seat 4: mvpalls ( 89,819 )
Seat 1: panpankracy ( 98,900 )
Seat 8: sleepingatlast ( 93,181 )
Seat 7: stajmak1897 ( 100,380 )
Trny:189716075 Level:14
Blinds-Antes(850/1 700 -220)
panpankracy posts ante [220]
bezuprechni posts ante [220]
A_Risky_Nit posts ante [220]
mvpalls posts ante [220]
ddaubar posts ante [220]
SmashUrGrandma posts ante [220]
stajmak1897 posts ante [220]
sleepingatlast posts ante [220]
A_Risky_Nit posts small blind [850].
mvpalls posts big blind [1,700].
** Dealing down cards **
Dealt to A_Risky_Nit [ Ad Ah ]
ddaubar folds
SmashUrGrandma folds
stajmak1897 folds
sleepingatlast folds
panpankracy folds
bezuprechni raises [3,569]
A_Risky_Nit raises [10,050]
mvpalls folds
bezuprechni calls [7,331]
** Dealing Flop ** [ Td, 2d, Ks ]
A_Risky_Nit bets [15,300]
bezuprechni calls [15,300]
** Dealing Turn ** [ 9c ]
A_Risky_Nit bets [34,000]
bezuprechni raises [142,996]
A_Risky_Nit is all-In [36,942]
** Dealing River ** [ Kd ]
bezuprechni shows [ 8c, Kc ]three of a kind, Kings.
A_Risky_Nit shows [ Ad, Ah ]two pairs, Aces and Kings.
bezuprechni wins 72,054 chips from the side pot 1 with three of a kind, Kings.
bezuprechni wins 197,744 chips from the main pot with three of a kind, Kings.
Player A_Risky_Nit finished in 459.
bezuprechni has knocked out A_Risky_Nit and won a $54 USD bounty prize.


Hello, I think preflop and flop are standrart but I am wondering what do you think is best for the turn... bet 50% or shove - that is what I think are the options, I dont really like my sizing
109$ turn sizing? Quote
11-28-2018 , 01:24 AM
Having the ace of diamonds is a thing here... it removes all his nut flush draw combos so hes slightly weighted towards having made hands now when he calls the flop.

I might just jam turn with the board fairly wet and we having low spr, he might level himself into calling thinking we on some type of draw or might see our shove as weak trying to maximise our FE.

On side note that turn is fairly disgusting, QJ is unblocked and I can see it continuing preflop and flop, but hay what can you do, we never folding at this spr
109$ turn sizing? Quote
11-28-2018 , 01:10 PM
Trying to pretend I don't know results here for a second:

First off, I'd go bigger on flop so I can set up a less awkward size to jam (or call off) either turn or river.

On the turn in a button vs. sb spot, villain can have all the QJ combos here, all the KT, all the sets other than KK (maybe TT or 99 4-bet pre at some frequency). He should have some T9 and K9 as well. He probably doesn't have QQ or JJ that often as those hands should 4-bet some percentage of the time, and he may start to fold those on the turn to a double barrel regardless.

Is villain going to call with his naked Kx enough and weak flush draws enough to make betting turn profitable? Is this a spot where it's better to check and induce bets, planning to jam reasonable rivers if it checks through? Just throwing it out there.

*In the future, don't post results as it can skew people's thought process. Knowing that this player went with top pair/weak kicker vs. someone who 3-bet pre and then double barreled changes how we think about this hand. I feel like any analysis I give is now tainted by that knowledge.
109$ turn sizing? Quote
11-28-2018 , 02:56 PM
Size up pre then go bet-jam. Sloppy pot geometry.
109$ turn sizing? Quote

      
m