Quote:
Originally Posted by Sect7G
I respectfully disagree with most of the above. It may be true on an individual basis that an investor may have a slightly better chance of being paid if they tip toe around the OP and be nice and all. But on the whole I feel it's much better to reveal OP's name/info and nearly any creative method to bring discomfort to the OP. This will act as a deterent to other would be scammers and in the long run would cause less rollers overall. As zima stated... scumbags are gonna be scumbags and I agree with this. Some people have no intention of paying back regardless of what is said about them while others end up making mistakes that gets them in a hole. This latter group may be more disciplined with investors money if they know in advance what will happen to them.
Some good points, and I agree to a certain extent. As I alluded too in my previous post, once we get to a point where it's reasonable to assume the debt is unlikely to be paid (I shouldn't have went as far as saying written off) I think it's fine to do whatever people think will work to retrieve the money, short of physical threat. I think there's a fine line wrt harassment and I'm not sure where that line is, but whatever that wasn't really the issue I was talking about.
I'm not sure what works better, overall, as a deterrent for future scammers. Like, if everyone is respectful (that doesn't mean pretending someones actions are okay, just not being trollish/dickish about it) while waiting for funds to be paid but then afterward everyone states their true opinion on the matter, I don't see how that will be much different. That's just my opinion and I really have no idea.
I think the bigger issue is whether it's fair to the investors and perhaps it should just be understood that we have to behave in a way that's best for the marketplace, overall instead of the individual investors. I'm not sure what the status quo is. Perhaps pming the investors and getting their input on how to handle the situation is best? I don't know.
Apologies for not being clearer in my original post, I meant to comment on the possibility that Zima's attitude may be the best way to elicit a payment by the average stakee, just not imo.
Also, I apologize if this has all been hashed out in the past and determined that it's all okay and the best way to handle things. I don't have a lot of experience with these things but just thought I'd add in my 2 cents. Some other posters made slightly similar replies in support of op and I thought they were way too lenient on op and didn't really make a good point.