Haha aye yesterday's red line was a bit crazy :P

1. That's not stupid dude, that's a back raise (or New York back raise). Depends on the reads he has on you and utg as to have much it is fps, but anyway it's a face up monster so your JJ is crushed.

2. Bet flop, take it from there...I stack off here nearly always (if you are stacking off, I don't see the logic in not value betting the flop?)

3. Fine.

4. Good (probably better than I bet it)

5. Fold Flop

Feel free to jump in and have a pop at some of mine [Captain Tilt Goes Forth]

1. I guess it's not "stupid" as he did own me. I guess we call pre, xc flop and xf turn on that runout?
2. I am prepared to stack off, I was hoping to XR flop.
5. lol

Thanks for your reply, I am going to check your thread out now

Accidentally posted in the wrong thread, ignore this.

Hey guys,

Not a huge amount played today, however I may endeavour into a late night session.

Felt great while playing today and definitely my A++ game with only two real mistakes (posted below). Definitely not running too well, but that'll all even out eventually

1. Hmm. I now count this as a mistake as V was 12/6/0 over 80 hands. Should I just be flatting instead of 4b-gii? And do you think it is a mistake to gii here?


2. V is unknown. Bluff looks good to me, AQ would have been nicer but AJ still looks pretty mandatory to me.


3. Vs good 26/20/8 reg. Pretty sure I cannot fold as he xb's Qx and I block JT+I think he bluffs here at a high frequency.


4. Mistake #2. I know this guy is a reg, but I do not have any stats on him as I haven't played with him since I wiped my database.


5. Math spot. I figured out that if I only GII OTR on hearts bar J5 then calling is =/= EV, plus, I have some thin SDV.



Today:


Month to date:


GLGL

Hand 2: Think about your range and you hits this board. xr really doesn't make much sense the lines you can take is xc which is nice /w Ad or bjam.

I guess you mean Hand 2 from the post before last?

Yeah, now that you point that out I should be cbetting. Cheers

Lil night sesh:

Had to stop after a hand that tilted me. Idk why I got so mad (apart from the obvious), prob the fact he's a 1 tabler from the UK and I know he's terrible.

1. The hand that tilted me, ofc he is unknown. It's probably his 2nd time playing online (bronze star). lol



2. He had a 90 second timebank and once it got down to 60 I knew he had to be calling. No way is someone going to think that long and not call when it isn't even half their stack lol. Ah well.



3. I think my turn sizing is too small. Vs 27/24/24 over 52 hands.


Today (updated):

Villains range is AA/KK, so I snap fold pre. That sort of post can attract a lot of heat on 2+2, so I'll amplify it for you. That way, even if you completely disagree you'll know where the thinking originates from.

Meta-wise, in win mode Zoom for me is all about choosing optimal spots and junking everything else ( Note: in training mode you might chose difficult spots on purpose, but that's another story and not everybody has a dedicated training mode).

There are many preflop spots you would never fold in reg spd (and definitely not in live) that you can simply junk in Zoom because hey the next hand is a btn click away. This is especially relevant because in Zoom as often of not you a playing villains in the dark (ie without meaningful data). So you have to make population assumptions.

My population assumption of villain in the JJ hand goes like this....

laggy reg (you have hands and notes) ----> Back raise (which you should know and recognise instantly) ------> monster (not AK) AA/KK ------> I'm crushed and cannot set mine, fold.

Smile at dodging the bullet, sit out while you make note on villain "played back raise pre".

Next hand ezy game.

ofc sometimes in ain't what it seems, but that's not how we play poker, and esp not how we play fast spd poker.

Other's will disagree - probably aggressively.

Be careful of mental game issues

The guy with 89 played it fine imo, pre but loose maybe. Flop is an ok float, overbet nuts Otr. You should prob bet turn or fold river or something.

Yeah def bet turn with KQ the fact he's a one tabling fish makes that even more of a bet

If he had 89s I'd have no quarrels, but 89o makes it horrendous. There's no way that is "fine"

Sorry, but this simply is not true. Backraises/back-shoves are just as ambiguous (if not more) than a standard shove.

Hey guys,

Today was pretty horrid haha. So many reverse setups for me lately, ran into AA pre 6 or 7 times in the last 5k hands or so . On a more positive note; I have played my A+ game over the last couple of days and made far less mistakes than usual. So at least something is going right

1. This was sick lol. Sometimes when I gii I cannot see V's cards until showdown, and this was one of those times haha - when the Q hit OTT I was 99% sure I was good. NOPE!

2. Vs unknown. Eeesh . At least I didn't shove river!

3). Haha

4. Is river a fold? V 46/35/25 13 hands. It has gotta be close, right?

5. Vs unknown. Kind of on the fence, although I don't think it can ever be terrible. I think he too much missed stuff, 9 OTR is a good card since he has less sets and running into that specific hand is pretty unfortunate IMO. Thoughts?


Today:


1st week:


Feedback appreciated

GL

Decided to play some more with the lovely Friday night drunks, t'was fun

Playing A++.

Sorry if I am spamming this thread. I look back on the hands I post everyday for my own gain. Any feedback is appreciated .

1. FK!! Vs standard reg. Fine?

2. Call because wtf. Xb flop was autopilot. I read the chat logs in the hand before I called and thought I had to call because of the xb otf. Vs 1 tabling Russian. W/e, gj buddy.

3. Vs mega fish. Prob looks mental. I knew he didn't have an 8 from his timings/how the hand played out.

4. Getting my own back on the 1 tabling Russians.


Today updated:


1st week updated:

I think the kj hand is overplayed on the river IMO

When the q hits the turn it's a very bad card obv and you are also nearly 150bb deep. Flush river I would either check and assess. I would prob just bet bet bet fold to jam.

Aj hand I'm finding after playing like 150k hands at 25z population is never bluffing when they over bet. For example today I played a hand, mp opens 3x I call in co w KQo, sb and bb call. Flop is qq3 r, mp bets 3/4 pot I call and sb with reg stats just jams like 5x pot.....I call he tables 33. It's so ridiculous how **** these regs are and so face up their plays are.

I'm now realising they play everything face up. Massive sizing tells on each street etc.

I saw u at the tables today mate glgl

My sn is maxde1

KJ - river is super close, I feel we are missing value from AK AA when we check. I'll do the Math later
AJ - yeah honestly I just don't understand his overbet, I have not even shown aggression.....

Sry to hear about the KQ hand, that ****in sucks!!

Cool man, I'll take you off that fish tag then (kidding )

Two very interesting hands:

(lemme know if you think these are WP or if you think I fk'd them up )

1. V is completely unknown.

2. SB is 44/20/0 over 28 hands and MP is 20/16/6 1.31 AF over 835 hands

1st hand is a good disciplined fold imo if BTN has a flush draw I think V calls with position and pot controls seeing how its multiway. the only criticism about the hand would be calling the flop raise to fold on a brick turn Kh doesn't improve BTN flop raise
but I do believe BTNs raising ranges consists of sets, 78 and very little f/ds + a few 2pairs that we beat unless its some fish
saying that I I'm not sure I'm good enough to fold a set in game so WP sir

this range is been more then generous by adding in so many f/ds which I think V doesn't raise on the flop and we are still behind in equity
do people agree with my thought process ?

+67s



also people just seem to have it in 25NL zooooooom my personal opinion !

If V has that many FD's in his range then we should be calling not folding! IMO he doesn't have anywhere near that amount of FD's though

Fold is quite bad. We're like 27% vs a value range of 55-66,54s-87s and we need <33% to call.

We have 27% as you said, but we need >33% not <33%

good read clanty would like to see more hands!

It's less than a pot size bet so we need <33%, we need like 32% or something, if he has like 1 combo of a fd or 77 or something it's a call

True

I didn't think we had 27% vs the range tbh. If I knew this then I would have called. Either way it's very very borderline at best, especially after rake.

Hey guys,

Haven't been running too great since the last update, nothing seems to be going my way even though I am playing my A++ game.

Usually I get pretty annoyed when I string a few losing sessions together, but at the moment I feel fine about the results as I know that I am playing well, just running pretty bad.

1. Hated myself for not raising flop after this happened, but that's just me being results orientated. Vs 23/18/7 over 330 hands.

2. Pretty sure this is a mandatory bluff. Vs 18/17/6 over 106 hands.

3. Think this is OK. What are your lines here? Vs unknown.

4. Vs unknown.

5. Fine? CO was 16/15/13 6.33 AF over 300 hands (prob a sample size issue) and SB was 18/14/5 over 53 hands.


Since last update:


Feedback appreciated, GLGL