not dead... really really alive

congrats on the results mate

PS: maradona es mas grande que Pelé eheheh

Holy **** 8bb/100 at 500z!

Keep up the good work my man, incredible year and we aren't even 4 months in!

Very well played m8, gz

you had a 70k hand breakeven stretch but still got 8bb/100. just goes to show that variance is a ***** . good zoom results.

what kind of winrate do you think is possible at 5/10 with no table selection compared to z500? I play too many tables when i zoom and play poorly compared to non zoom, i think. But waiting around at 5/10 is nut low. it just me that has this problem?

Nice results. Would be awesome if you can sustain such winrates over a bigger sample.

Glg


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

You mean like the entirety of last year? You might already be aware, if not check out his first RIO vid for results.

Killing it man, keep up the good work.

Have enjoyed the RIO stuff so far too, so good work on that also.

Thank you all for the nice words guys .

I'm winning @ 7evbb in NL1k the last 100k hands, I'm getting 3evbb with less than 4 players which is very good I think, and like 8evbb with 5players+. I think the best way is to find your best number of tables mixing zoom and 1k, thats what I do. I usually start my session with 3 or 4 zoom, and depending on the action on 1k I close some zooms. I multitable much more than avg, but probly playing 1 or 2 zoom until you get fine action on 1k is going to be the best thing for you. I also don't think playing like 4 tables 3handed is a good approach, I think playing just 1 table 3h and prioritize zoom games is going to be much more +ev than battling; it's also going to be less stressfull given you are going to have much less variance playing zoom than 3h games where usually the regs battling are very good..

Long live zoom .

Really glad you like my content!!

Isn't your WR supposed to go up when it's shorthanded? Pretty sure ishter's WR was quite a bit higher in the shorthanded games at this level than when full. Can you elaborate on this?

Short handed games often don't have recreational players.

As far as I understood he is talking about battling regs 3 handed which doesnt really make much money for obvious reasons vs. playing zoom pool which generally needs fish to run / (alot of times 500z pool looks like just regs playing eachother not sure why most regs even do that if clearly not being top regular).

Value of battling regs 3 handed comes obviously by getting instant seat when fish joins & improving your game by playing tough players but makes sense that it won't likely be so profitable as zoom for him.

Gl Im following!

wow just saw this thread. Epic

This.

The value of play 3h is about getting the seat when the rec shows up. It seems quite impossible to have better winrate when you are battling against 2 tough regs than when you are in a 6max table with a fish.

Intersting graph.

But can you explain THIS !

Your Lifetime graph:




Your graph from the last 12 month:




If you cant explain these graphs then I have to talk with run-it-once. Because im the Robin Hood from the Internet I will expose EVERY SCAMMER COACH !

Of course I can, like 90% of my lifetime volume is zoom500, and that site doesnt track zoom. I’ve lost a bunch at nl5k and probly at 2k also a couple years ago. I also was breakeven before 2015. Taking all this things into acount, that graph doesnt surprise me at all.

7bb ev last 100k games. So you must be pretty hard below EV.
Maybe you can show this graph.

Im not at home until monday, but you can look at my first rio vid + this last graph and take your own conclusions

That sounds for me that you cant provide a graph !

God, this people... on monday you will have your graph.

i enjoy you rio vids ty
like the thought process and your different style
keep them going and nice results!

Bless us with some HH? Gl señor

Ive heard the site doensn't track past couple years results and as mentioned not tracking zoom. I may be wrong about first one though. Graphs are easy to modify though even I'm not suspicious of OPs results.

Its common sense most people are breakeven / losing for quite some time before they get good, its quite rare to be immediate crusher.. Considering someone having tracked record of 2,2M hands is actually very good sign it means he has been grinding quite abit and needs to have learned something on the way. More suspicious are coaches who put 100-200k sample of having a great winrate somewhere and having nickname which no one recognizes / hasn't seen playing alot ever.. And there is plenty of these guys out there.

Even the pokertableratings at that time was not accurate at all...

What do you think of Innerpsy ?