Quote:
Originally Posted by Stroggoz
no reads, just hard work in the lab and thinking critically paying off.
You gotta have at least some sort of read to make that play, that at least he is capped to A9 for value and has a lot of draws for that sizing, which some villains will definitely be. It was mw and if somehow he decided to use mainly that sizing with his range OTT, then your play isn't approved by theory(if he is giving up some hands OTF/OTT). It's always a valuebet what you did there, but vs a range with enough sets/overpairs it's not a good move(unless he is overbluffing), so you rely on some sort of read to justify your play. Correct me if I'm wrong(I don't use solvers), but villain's sizing OTT isn't a thing, he should either bet big or check in there, so by facing that sizing it looks like you're facing an exploitative strat(which you managed to find a very good solution by x/r a lot and get it in with thinner value than most people would).
Quote:
Originally Posted by luckhoney17
is it not optimistic to think you might be able to beat long time veterans like innerpsy at 500z?
From what I heard, innerpsy isn't one of the best, he also 4-tables and stream at the same time, making it hard to focus, so he is probably not a threat for OP. but he gets 100% rakeback, so he is probably one of the biggest winners just because of that, but himself being one of the biggest winners won't make it harder for other players, since he isn't taking money from them. Even if he is break-even he will be a >3bb winner because of the rakeback.
Last edited by Rapidesh123; 09-05-2018 at 09:46 AM.