Something def going on. But it’s def a terrible bot, not someone u should lose too many bbs too, if anything.

day 3:

played vs you, it looks like you love x/r the river haha!

gl

Cool hands man :-) I like all except the AcTc, feels like that's not going to end up going too well for you - villain already messes up his flop raise size and probably doen't have a raise-folding range, and some people stackoff overpairs there in his shoes so the T blocker is not a very big deal. I guess you might've had reads though :P

very cool hands, good luck

Didnt have any reads. I thought it was ok against the population. I messed around with some nodelocking on this particular hand after my session. I make a lot of mistakes from playing 4 tables, not getting enough time to think through decisions is a bit of a weak disadvantage.

subbed

im in, glgl

Hope to see extended posting this time, even if downswing hits.

Subbed and gl!

I had to cancel the other thread as a favour to a friend. This one will last longer.

been getting terrible internet disconnects, once every hour or so for 20-30 seconds at a time..

day 4:

f...ing beast!! We ve played some hands in the past. Subbed and stay strong, u dont need luck

nice results, subbed

hahaha.

Wow. What made you 4bet all in here? Did you have a specific read?

no reads, just hard work in the lab and thinking critically paying off.

some top preflop spew.




day 5:

Do you put a lot of hours of Pio? If so, do you mostly nodelock sims or not?

yes, solvers are the best way to study imo. I put a lot of hours into them. I use all features of pio and do nodelocking a fair bit. it's one of the best features of pio.

is it not optimistic to think you might be able to beat long time veterans like innerpsy at 500z?

im in gl

GL OP

donking this turn oop seems very weird to me?

You gotta have at least some sort of read to make that play, that at least he is capped to A9 for value and has a lot of draws for that sizing, which some villains will definitely be. It was mw and if somehow he decided to use mainly that sizing with his range OTT, then your play isn't approved by theory(if he is giving up some hands OTF/OTT). It's always a valuebet what you did there, but vs a range with enough sets/overpairs it's not a good move(unless he is overbluffing), so you rely on some sort of read to justify your play. Correct me if I'm wrong(I don't use solvers), but villain's sizing OTT isn't a thing, he should either bet big or check in there, so by facing that sizing it looks like you're facing an exploitative strat(which you managed to find a very good solution by x/r a lot and get it in with thinner value than most people would).


From what I heard, innerpsy isn't one of the best, he also 4-tables and stream at the same time, making it hard to focus, so he is probably not a threat for OP. but he gets 100% rakeback, so he is probably one of the biggest winners just because of that, but himself being one of the biggest winners won't make it harder for other players, since he isn't taking money from them. Even if he is break-even he will be a >3bb winner because of the rakeback.