interesting spot from today at nl50 (no HH yet because bovada) -
open 3x from utg with ATs, button and SB call.
flop is 468r with a backdoor for me. I cbet 80% pot b/c yay cbets, button folds and SB calls.
Turn is a Tx. opponent checks, i check.
River is A. Opponent bets pot.
It's very possible for my opponent to value bet the river with a worse two pair. But I'm not sure that it's very possible for my opponent to use that sizing with two pair. My feeling was and is that that sizing is polarizing enough that my top two is a bluffcatcher.
I would have snap called a 60% to 75% pot bet. But pot felt like my opponent's sizing said sets or a straight, and one that I'd consider to be a default fold if i think my opponent is a standard weak passive player.
This sort of logic is why I checked turn - I don't think I have two streets of value to bet, so I wanted to pot control.