Quote:
Originally Posted by ready 2 win
Could you pls go more into detail with this?9
see below
Quote:
Originally Posted by sheeprustler
Have you ever staked someone that didn't give a reference?
yes
Quote:
Originally Posted by roomik17
probably easier to track
yeah, mtts are much easier to track. there are ways to track cashgames, but just a lot more trust goes into it.
Quote:
Originally Posted by marek_heinz
Also MTTs are softer, a lot of players are capable of beating stakes they dont have money for whereas with cash the toughness goes up fairly linearly, so if you have a roll for NL100, it doesnt make sense to get staked for NL400
yeah.
also, staking someone for 200nl, they need a lot more money in account right away then someone being staked for mtts up to 109s. obv this isnt a huge factor, but it does come into play
Quote:
Originally Posted by ashinynickel
Would it ever be worth it for you to stake someone only for live tournaments or is the amount of volume you can put in on the live tournament circuit too low for your current bankroll?
sure, it might be worth it. there is a ton of money to be made live.
dont think we would ever do it though. just so much variance in live only deals.
Quote:
Originally Posted by brentras15
gl mane
tyty