Sorry for the late response, been away for the weekend to a music festival. Got back yesterday and started back up the grind today. I will do my best to go through and respond to any posts. I will then do a double post and do a November update.
Quote:
Originally Posted by max85
out of interest, i just looked at my stats playing 200z and 500 on ignition, decent sample, im playing 27/23/11 approx with wr of 5ish bb. Simply because im brushing up on theory and play before aussie millions.
Playing 19/16 is way too nitty imo. I would suggest playing more laggy IP vs fish and 3b alot more to iso ip. GL
Interesting. I still stand by my preflop ranges. I have spent the entire year changing my preflop ranges and I think as of the last 2 months, it is very close to optimal for the population I play in.
I think you are seriously underestimating how much rake plays a factor in preflop ranges but if you can subsidize this by maximising EV out of a fish then it seems fine.
Quote:
Originally Posted by outfit
19 vs pop who's 3-bet < 10
How did you set up you're sims?
I have already accounted for this. Do you mean set up sims for postflop?
Quote:
Originally Posted by Brokenstars
Should clarify that 0ev hands in a high rake environment become -ev
Strongly agree
Quote:
Originally Posted by tgiggity
even with a million hand sample, do you really have enough of a sample of individual hands from specific positions, eg. T9s from EP, to say if it's + or - EV? You're gunna have what, a 600ish hand sample to work with?
This is true, although you can probably group some hands to help estimate. Even still, the sample is probably not going to be enough.
If you think intuitively about
:
- Preflop ranges
- Population tendencies
- Rake
- How solvers actually find the "nash equilibrium"
then you will understand what preflop ranges should look like in annon pools.
Quote:
Originally Posted by tgiggity
twins! except I don't play Z
Quote:
Originally Posted by formula72
How tight could you go and still break-even or profit. 18 12? I have a good chunk of hands but play far tighter than you. I'm I likely just enjoying the sunny side of variance?
I think you would get less punished playing tighter vs looser in annon pools. Yeah I mean Vpiping 18 seems ok but PFR is probably too low. You probably want to get that up to around 16. You want to be aggressive with your tight range.
Quote:
Originally Posted by meale
On a related note, how many hands would one need to ram through a neural net til you have yourself a working poker bot?
I have heard some ridiculous claims regarding volume for this prop bet you have with broken. Seems like you two are going to be working poker bots.
Quote:
Originally Posted by outfit
In 2003 you could go less than 10 VPIP. Try it, and see if it works today.
Edit: I used to do that full ring. I am not sure 6-max. I forgot that game is dead and 6-max was implied.
Lol less than 10vpip. Those must've been the days....
Quote:
Originally Posted by Avaritia
I think anon creates the closest thing to the old days of poker where diff stats can produce similar winrates, as opposed to screen names/history where stats are much more converged in 2018, as people try to out pio each other and such.
One thing is for certain. In 2003, 2012, 2018, 2100, until the heat death of the universe...people will be making fun of other peoples nitty stats.
imo
Never got to experience "back in the day" poker but this seems to make sense. I think screen name game you cannot get away with being too nit or too loose. Its pretty easy to counter both extremes imo.
Quote:
Originally Posted by Kizzah
Skuz im poker pro in less than 3 days, u have any tips?
btw that busto $0.00 on iggy -> $6.81 remaining crypto deposit ... it's now $1,655.10 (more coz in cashed tourny but yeh) all from cash rly, how good am i? like what, 4 days? or was it 5? 150k/yr next yr
Wow mad respek. That ROI.
My advice would be to take a 1.6 buyin shot at 1knl? Seems reasonable and non degen.