Quote:
Originally Posted by Minatorr
6b jw how far did you get into your math degree? Did you get into upper div or at least an intro to proofs? If not, i'd suggest looking into theoretical/abstract math first before deciding to go to a diff uni for math. Most people don't really understand what true math is, not one bit and how difficult it is. And when they finally realize what math encompasses and how insanely difficult it is, they usually end up dropping out
Hint: it's not about finding/computing/calculating super long and tedious derivatives, integrals, probabilities, expectations, etc. Most mathematicians just think of that as noise and child's play nuisance and dont consider that real math
If you havent gotten there yet id recommend looking at an intro to abstract math, or if you did that look at an intro to either abstract algebra, linear algebra (proofs only course), or real analysis. If you dont like them at the very least, you should consider doing something other than math. Anyway finance is much less time consuming and more useful for you in job market and earning more money, while spending less time on studying/degree.
Take it from someone who did a business degree and a math degree. Graduating in 21 days. Seriously. Unless you are literally dying to get a math degree youre better off doing finance imo
Gl
Thank you. Tbh you're completely right.
I've seen what "real maths" looks like and it's all proofs. Prove this hypothesis. Prove that theorem. It's so different to high school maths, which is all about calculations. Calculate this angle. Calculate that integral.
Proofs can be insanely difficult and idk how far I'll get in that branch of maths, so I'm leaning towards something applied, like finance, engineering, statistics or computer science.
For now, I'll just learn the raw maths and I'll use it as a kind of building block, then I'll pick some application for it later.
Quote:
Originally Posted by Fossilkid93
I've found that poker players are quite respectful and supportive once you reach the upper echelons of professionalism i.e. work hard, study hard, introspection, strong mental game, etc. You've not really shown much effort in any of those areas which I would guess is why the general reception in this thread has been negative.
Anyway, I think this is a wise decision for you. If your heart is not in the poker and there's no drive to grind it out at NL100 and learn and continue to grow, then it's better to step away. Had you continued you probably would've put in token volume at NL100 and taken tilt shots if you weren't sunrunning and probably had big losses.
Again I applaud the decision and wish you the best of luck on your new path.
Thank you for your kind words. I am pretty happy with this decision.
Well I don't really want to get into an argument about it, but I find that poker is similar to politics in terms of how much people respect you: you could be the president of the United States and people will still hate you and give you zero respect. It's just not a profession where people are friendly and kind to each other, just because you've worked your way up.
I look at people like Doug Polk, Matt Berkey, Daniel Negreanu, etc. They've made millions from high stakes poker and yet attract far more negativity than they deserve imo.
Compare that to something like a maths teacher. Or a firefighter. They get a lot of respect for what they do, even though it's objectively easier than being a high stakes poker pro or a famous politician.
I know I shouldn't care what other people think... but I do. Especially when I'm going on a downswing and losing all my money, and I come to the realisation that my reputation is the only thing I have left.