Octobers results. It's jaggy because it is 50 nlz and 10 nlz. Not included is about $150 of 5nlz (all on the phone in the gym) cardmatch and stars rakeback.
Good bounce back this morning (playing around 5am has slways worked for me ??)
Good start...little bit of dynamic this was anout the tenth hand in and just previously I had (btn) 3bet this villain off his co raise. He snaps every action.
This is so not the thing to do with AQ here
PS 4bet size was a little bit of XPLO but even so I overdid it.
Preflop: Hero is SB with A K
4 folds, Hero raises to $1, BB raises to $3.50, Hero raises to $9.50, BB raises to $50.50, Hero raises to $63.19 and is all-in, BB calls $0.25 and is all-in
Flop: ($101.50) 6 8 3 (2 players, 2 are all-in) Turn: ($101.50) 8 (2 players, 2 are all-in) River: ($101.50) 4 (2 players, 2 are all-in)
Results: $101.50 pot ($2 rake)
Final Board: 6 8 3 8 4
Hero showed A K and won $99.50 ($48.75 net)
BB showed Q A and lost (-$50.75 net)
note to villain, this is why I would never ever BB flat with Ax anything versus a SB raise, whatever the raise size, and an example of why I 3bet SB raises like a monkey on speed.
H3
Bluffing fish is not part of my game period...but it plays itself imo??
more importantly, a good example of fast poker Bayes Theorem fish detection (no HUD stats, based on bet sizing alone) and a instant in-hand switch to XPLO mode.
Typical old guy at the casino. Has a lot of tendencies like limping AK, flatting with KK to make sure there is no Ace on the flop, and stacking off with overpairs. Doesn't bluff much if ever. Often grumpy but not necessarily.
By my pathetic volume standards I've played more zoom recently than I have for while - inspired by the October Heater no doubt. All b/e so far for November, although I did have one surreal 50nlz, where I dropped two buyins in like 20 hands. Got dealt KK 5 or 6 times in first 20-30 hands, top set three times, lost two to broadway and split the third after running it twice, lost first run to a made flush (which was flopped) and won second run with the case King on the river. NLHE online = weird **** sometimes.
I quit then...monkey tilt brain was well in control.
Offer in on the London flat...zero celebration until the money is in my bank. UK house buying/selling process sucks the big hairy meatball!!
Some big possibilities in the offing, so I'm gonna take a break form 2+2 and come back in 2018, when i've more interesting stuf to blog about.
By my pathetic volume standards I've played more zoom recently than I have for while - inspired by the October Heater no doubt. All b/e so far for November, although I did have one surreal 50nlz, where I dropped two buyins in like 20 hands. Got dealt KK 5 or 6 times in first 20-30 hands, top set three times, lost two to broadway and split the third after running it twice, lost first run to a made flush (which was flopped) and won second run with the case King on the river. NLHE online = weird **** sometimes.
I quit then...monkey tilt brain was well in control.
Offer in on the London flat...zero celebration until the money is in my bank. UK house buying/selling process sucks the big hairy meatball!!
Some big possibilities in the offing, so I'm gonna take a break form 2+2 and come back in 2018, when i've more interesting stuf to blog about.
Poker has not been top of my priorities during December....in fact it would not make the top 10.
The London property sale is turning into a complete goat...snafu.
I've taken a very short term (deliverables on 5th Jan) job, for the wonga which is vg. That and the usual Christmas commitments of a very large and disperse family, have kept me off the felt most of the time.
That will all thin out by mid January, so I'll start thinking about my poker goals for 2018 in a couple of weeks time.
Meanwhile...
I've been thinking (quite deeply) about the whole 2+2 thing. On the one hand I've learnt nearly everything I know about nlhe right here (BQ and PGCs predominantly). And there are some pgc's I really enjoy following and learning from.
On the other, when you do a little digging, you find so many of the posters offering their opinions (and often not in a nice way) are:
[x] Cr@p at the game (ie worse than me cr@p)
[x] Poker wannabees, fantasists and walts.
[x] Outright fraudsters.
[x] All of the above.
So in 2018, I have decided to put some work into identifying the best pgcs to follow for online 50 nlz to 200 nlz and make it my business to stay out of all the other "shonky" threads.
So a question...who has pgc recommendations for the above. To repeat:
6 max 50nl zoom, 100nl zoom & 200nl zoom. Looking for regs with a track record of writing credible pgc over decent volumes.
Poker has not been top of my priorities during December....in fact it would not make the top 10.
The London property sale is turning into a complete goat...snafu.
I've taken a very short term (deliverables on 5th Jan) job, for the wonga which is vg. That and the usual Christmas commitments of a very large and disperse family, have kept me off the felt most of the time.
That will all thin out by mid January, so I'll start thinking about my poker goals for 2018 in a couple of weeks time.
Meanwhile...
I've been thinking (quite deeply) about the whole 2+2 thing. On the one hand I've learnt nearly everything I know about nlhe right here (BQ and PGCs predominantly). And there are some pgc's I really enjoy following and learning from.
On the other, when you do a little digging, you find so many of the posters offering their opinions (and often not in a nice way) are:
[x] Cr@p at the game (ie worse than me cr@p)
[x] Poker wannabees, fantasists and walts.
[x] Outright fraudsters.
[x] All of the above.
So in 2018, I have decided to put some work into identifying the best pgcs to follow for online 50 nlz to 200 nlz and make it my business to stay out of all the other "shonky" threads.
So a question...who has pgc recommendations for the above. To repeat:
6 max 50nl zoom, 100nl zoom & 200nl zoom. Looking for regs with a track record of writing credible pgc over decent volumes.
Was wondering where you'd got to lately!
You're absolutely right about a lot of the comments particularly on hands in many different forums. It's very difficult to know who to listen to and who not to.
I'd go back and read ishter's PGC, otb's, xpastorcitox, can't think of who else off the top of my head tbh - definitely check to see end of year results that get posted by all the other 200/500z guys and figure out the winners are and who you can study.
Haven't ever really gone away...just that for a myriad of (boring) reasons poker has been way down my to do list for the past 7 months.
Anyways. made a tidy score on my London flat, it's in the spoiler, so if you read it, it's officially not a brag.
Spoiler:
$100K, after cgt
Currently doing a consultancy gig until the end of May - advising GDPR, if you've heard of it, so plan to get moving towards 100 nlz in a 6 weeks or so.
Meanwhile, doing some 25nlz (which is reaaallllyyyy fishy all the time) for training and to get back into the swing of it.
I plan focus my HH towards tough folds, but have not had any in the last two sessions, so just a welcome back hand to lol at.
PS OMC plans to be an aggressive redline warrior and I'm over-rolled, so hit it baby
I'm confused. Whether you're striving to play GTO or max exploit, I think 86s should be a fold pre no matter what the make-up of the table.
QQ is also an obvious check on the flop. It would prob be fine for UTG to check entire range in that spot. There's nothing in his range that desperately needs "protection" that doesn't also work as a check-call and bluffcatch, and he should expect CO to stab at a high freq, as that board connects with just about everything in CO's range (only JJ/TT check back).
Villain's line seems perfect to me. I'm not sure if you should be shoving turn tbh. You have no bluffs there and you're often crushed.
I'm confused. Whether you're striving to play GTO or max exploit, I think 86s should be a fold pre no matter what the make-up of the table.
QQ is also an obvious check on the flop. It would prob be fine for UTG to check entire range in that spot. There's nothing in his range that desperately needs "protection" that doesn't also work as a check-call and bluffcatch, and he should expect CO to stab at a high freq, as that board connects with just about everything in CO's range (only JJ/TT check back).
Villain's line seems perfect to me. I'm not sure if you should be shoving turn tbh. You have no bluffs there and you're often crushed.
To be fair in live poker when rake is not a factor and everyone at the table is a loose passive fish with a 3! of like 4% i call 86s and the lot all day long in LP even 100bb deep
Also arty, i'm assuming ur going to be betting with other set combos if ur xing QQ here don't think many ppl will 3-barrel down or work in some overbet strat with much pure bluffs or deviate by betting more hands etc.
I play zoom exactly like a live player plays live so this type of statement...
Quote:
You have no bluffs there and you're often crushed.
...is conceptually dead to me as I have no "gto" type balance. I play every single hand exploitatively and of course that makes me super exploitable, but then who gives a toss, because zoom up to 50 nlz is a fishfest and the regs are easily
a spotted
b.avoided.
Will this work at 100 nlz...don't know, don't care.
PS and given many GTOregbots suck multiway with fish in the pot and especially oop deep-stacked, its not like there's a shortage of fun spots to get into against the regbots (who are mostly auto-piloting multi-tabling anyway).
When you don't give a toss about volume, and its all about the fun, the possibilities are endless
It will take about 5 years to put a 100K hand graph up, but maybe I'll manage it one day.