Graphs and yearly winrate are looking good. Congratulations man!

vamooooooo

I’d suggest re tagging that ‘Brazilian reg’ after seeing that

Slowly reading this thread. Have just about finished 1 page. If you were in the BB with this combo facing say a 2.2x from BTN or LFI from SB (I don't know cash game tendencies on dot com but over here, BTNs limping or massively sizing down and SBs limping is pretty common even in cash). What would u do?

This is slam dunk in the iso bin vs SB or BTN limp right? esp with the low kicker. What about facing say 2x from BTN?

Love the turn and river. You unblock the weakest part of his range by not having spades.

Having said that, I think u have to bet turn close to pot. Like you gotta pump in that money large. Esp if you had clubs. The best suit u can have here for bluffing is s

Nice reading thus far.

TT hand, as played, villain's turn check is awesome.You have to lead that 6.

1. Your x/c range has more 6Xs than his bet IP which has a lot more Ace. The card brings massive advantage to your range. You have a lot of suited AX and suited connectors + you'd call a min 3b pre with all of them and check since he 3b pre.

2. Leading the 6 OTT will start to print over the long run with a wider range. since the board pairing means you will not be facing a 2b with offsuit value AK, AQ, AJ etc.

Your turn bluffs are basically non-existent if you don't rep that awesome card.

Got lucky on the river. Villain bet sizing deserves a slap and calling the 2b, god damn....

Poorly played by both though. Your turn is bad in the long run and stifles your ability to bluff with a wider range, his river call licked balls.

Yeah, the 1st hand was WP.

In the 2nd one Rapi should definitely be donk bluffing that turn to rep 6x though.

What 6x? Villain prob has more 6x

Back to PIO school boys. Both ranges contain pretty equivalent 6x (in that it's v low occurring in both IP and OOP range, but still favouring IP) and IP still has a pretty clear range and nut advantage. Not to mention that bluff leading something as strong as TT on the 6 turn is a pretty huge over bluff.

But sir, he bet the flop and the bottom card paired, he cant have a 6

leading turn 6x in 3bet pot suck dick

Either both ranges are same or it's a 3b pot. Once it's a 3b pot that argument is a bit weak and only passable because of the trash sizing.

on that board villain ain't gonna 2b with his offsuit pair heavy linear value range and forget about bluffing turns if you aren't leading there with some frequency.

My point was that 'villain got what he deserved for checking turn' is the wrong perspective. Also it implies Hero is folding to a barrel, well that would be a stupid waste of equity. Villain did not make a mistake OTT.

Kangal, why mention ranges when you're only going to look at this spot and only think about the times where we over-bluff good equity. Also, very rarely are we getting raised here on the paired turn so the over-bluff thing is overly-narrow view and focusing too much on these two napkins than the spot more generally.

what's your IP 3bet sizing, if 3x is "trash sizing"?

wouldn't T9 make a better turn lead than a hand with as much sdv as TT? or are we just donking everything because lol the 6 paired (in a 3bet pot)?

So Hero going to fold to turn IP barrel? Ok, cool, check the turn, it's fine but barreling that 6 for IP is a big no no. Driving away value most of the time. It worked out for hero this time does not mean he played it well.

WP Hero. "punishment for checking back the turn" Super. It's makes me say 'Oh my' without the gosh.

we wont updates rapi

wut

rapidesh played his TT well, leading turn on the 6 is not a thing

Nor is barreling when checked to in a 3b pot on that turn. Rapidesh spiked a boat on the river or he'd be hoistin' his own petard. Good thing the villain was better at sinking his own ship. What rapidesh did was pretty ordinary mate.

Villian should barell turn with AQ tbh for protection. Why allow opponent free 5% equity, if you can get him off TT by betting? Bad play from him.

Rapi has the best possible draw on that turn. Either donk or check raise as a bluff. Those were his only options. He decided to go for XR obviously and hit his draw otr.

Thread is boring now that Rapid is playing well, having results, not playing like an absolute donkey, and defending his punts to death.

In all seriousness, congrats OP! You will actually be at 200 pretty soon.

for someone claiming to play like pio you may want to look this one up ZKesic because you are wrong

Yea xeno is right.

Ax and Kx top pairs don't need to bet for protection as they don't have overcards to fear and many worse hands will struggle to find calls.

Zkesic has to be trolling

#badreg

I’d usually try and engage when someone tries to talk strat, but I literally don’t even know what point you’re trying to make here. This is just incoherent.

I mention ranges because they are important and because you seem to think that the turn 6 pairing is significantly better for us than IP, implying that 6 is a card that appears often enough in our range (and seldom enough in IPs range) that we should be leading.

If this is the case, you may want to reconsider your 3bet defence ranges a bit, and either start 4betting or folding more.

We also have different ideas of good equity bluffs.

I'd take a supercomputer vs supercomputer solution over any human

Thing is theory is like Martial Arts...Most think you can only play one way or another...but if you wanted complete proficiency you'd not like to just learn Karate. I know it's hard but maybe upgrade to Jujitsu + Kung Fu...

I know sometimes you just wanna lick someone down with a flash to the back of their head and it works. Surely does. So does a repeated kick below the belt or a fist to the jaw in the midst of the war, shoryuken!

But when you master all Martial Arts you can adapt to villain who only knows Karate, or is on some pure strategy.

In the end, it's just logic man. Theory is far more aggro, you prolly not arsed enough to work hard and fear being on the frontier like an Israeli

I mean this is not optimal or exploitative but just logic. When the river bricks and most of our bluffs don't get there we got to cram. If river was a connected heart or smth, all our bluffs got there, we'd bet small...Makes proper sense cuz LOGIC > Everything

https://www.boomplayer.com/30705216_8EC0143BC5

Blud I am only talking sense, don't take offense.

Nobody plays like pio but without knowing the answer, even your exploits will go horribly wrong. In fact, most people **** up running exploits way more than if they appreciated constraining their strategy to the most important thing in poker - the deck. If the deck doesn't co-operate, you fold...poker is easy, just gotta put in some hard work.