H1: call. most of his range is pair + heart draw. unlikely you're behind.

H2: poor shove, no fold equity against a fish.

H4: poor call. you're calling off 80% of your stack for a chop, when it's far more likely he has a better full house. or in this case, quads.

H4 you aren't even chopping that often and even if you might be you aren't getting odds to call. His sizing is really nutted too I think. Just super lol torch.

All hands are well played imo. Especially KThh river call is a very balanced high frequency non exploitable equilibrium threshold razzle dazzle call.

Think I got most buzz words Rapidesh likes to throw around. Apologies if I missed some.

Idk, man, but yeah, I need to be chopping like 80% of the time in there. Guy defended too much pre and otf and was aggro otr.

Also bigger sizings look more bluffy imo, because I think these guys go smaller with their FHs. But you're probably right, maybe I'm overdoing in those calls.

I need to chop like 85% of the time.

Yeah, gotta fold there and call all hands that beat the board.

Damn, I deleted that comment literally 10 seconds after posting it. How are you responding that fast?

Anyways, I originally misunderstood your post a bit. We're on the same page I think.

Sharingan, bro! Haha

But yeah, I was ******ed to call that off, overdoing in these calls because of how much BS I've seen after I started bluffcatching people. My river call success increased from 45% to 50% and I'm defending the river way more.

But gotta let go in those spots, math is just against us.

Yesterday I didn't feel like playing and studied a lot of pio(lots of probe betting spots), will play 100z today

Yeah I would think you are chopping <20% of the time here. Check your database.
Just check your database for these types of spots. Good way to learn.

Only looking at the positions/actions in the hand his range should be reasonably strong regardless of tendencies (because you don't have a big enough sample for this spot)...CO v UTG open...3bet pot...you have traps when you check back the turn and he just piles he doesn't get to the river with tons of random unpaired hands you beat (like 6 combos suited broadways maybe? and then he has to overbet jam them? vs like all the combos of overpairs/Ax/FHs). It requires a ton of assumptions to make this call.

I think you have a massive bias towards making big calls vs overbets like this and are probably losing a ton of money in these spots if you filter for them.

People are more likely to overbet jam as a bluff if they think they're chopping a lot when called.

But even with that you're right that it's a bad call

[x]has the answer to everything
[x]stuck in micros for years
[x]belives nl200 is hs
[ ] prints dollars

Not anymore, man!
It's just a matter of time until I'm back at 200z streets

I like your strategy of playing lower stakes during weekdays and 100nl on weekends. How are your results going at 100nl? I stopped checking your thread after you said you were taking some time off to study the game. Did you see any improvements so far? wr higher over decent sample? GL!

jesus that JcTc hand

does your brain just shut off for a minute every hour?

I truly hopes it ends well after all this time
We all spent on this. Haters and lovers!
I never used this internet **** before someone was
In love with me back in the days and had to laugh
Here i am again. Major troll!


Gl and if you make it to msnl and hs im looking forward to
Test my lack of off table work vs a poker professor.
Pokerstove for life
This is my last post ever!

JcTc is fine imo, don't need insane amounts of fold equity to be +EV and if villain is clicking really hard I think I get a lot of folds in there. If he is a nitfish it's obv bad, but it's more likely that he is clicking and has few trips given his 33% stab otf and 50% ott. Most fish size up with trips otf and ott afraid of the flush.

100z still negative lifetime, but looking better

Improved a lot vs button clickers and vs good regs a little bit.

Haha, can't wait to play vs you, vo2max.
Btw, never tell me who you are when we play, wanna figure out by myself

Vaaaamoooo

I mean, he keeps saying that min check raises are always the nuts from fish.

For some reason he seems to think that min 3bets are weak however.

It’s terrible.

Min x/r ott/otr by passive fish*

Holy **** I hadn't looked at the JT hand lmao. No you won't be at 200z anytime soon if you make a mistake like that while shottaking it'll set you back a week with current WR of ~$30 a day. It's crazy and says a lot about the pool you can be a winning player while doing stuff like that and the KT hand.
Honestly I think this happens to lots of poker players (brain shuts off during a hand...it does happen to me for sure) but it's important to recognize it and try to avoid doing it in the future...


Everything you said here is wrong. Check the hand in equilab or something. Those stats are really meaningless without a giant sample. Also stab BvB is very different from stab in other positions...really relevant stat is his fold to check raise which is what I would be looking at.

They also may not size up cause they think your range is weak, they aren't thinking about sizing, or they are inducing. I think his sizing is really normal OTT he is setting up stacks perfectly for a shove on river.

Just try playing ABC what is this double check-raise nonsense...really look in your DB when you are studying try skipping PIO...dunno why I make this suggestion I guess it's good advice for whoever reads this (look at your DB more and Pio less sometimes).

I had 0 hands on him, man, was talking about his sizing tells. Hard to think a fish has many trips that 33% otf

Oh misread. Well, I think the sizing gives you about as much information about his range as the HUD stats on 20 hands villain would. I think the fact that he is still betting a decent size after calling a checkraise OTF would say he's fairly strong here.

Thinking there's some big sizing tell from it when everyone is betting 33% these days is a huge leak. The fact that you mentioned those numbers with stab made me assume you were talking about stab vs missed cbet, which actually has relevance. Also the fact you had zero hands on him makes your play even worse...

What did PIO say about this hand?