Honestly all these hands look like tilty spew to me. Tilt isn't just ripping in stacks blind it can cause you to make many other mistakes that add up.
H4 is just a fold pre...I have no idea why you do the 20% bet on river either it's just
a torch. He's sigh calling everything. Looks like the pool is exploiting you like crazy so congrats on that.
Honestly all these hands look like tilty spew to me. Tilt isn't just ripping in stacks blind it can cause you to make many other mistakes that add up.
H4 is just a fold pre...I have no idea why you do the 20% bet on river either it's just
a torch. He's sigh calling everything. Looks like the pool is exploiting you like crazy so congrats on that.
Could fold pre, but if he isn't 4-betting AK it's a very good call imo. Some guys in the pool 4-bet only KK/AA for value and some bluffs while calling QQ/AK in these positions. I thought he didn't have AK in his range, so went for it.
People go really crazy on my HHs, sure that there's some bad hands here and I try to post every single bad one (even the smaller ones). But the truth is that everyone makes mistakes, there's one reg who 4-bet-called 98s vs me 100bb deep at 200z BTN vs CO and he is still playing there, it's so annoying to see that.
That many hands that are misplayed to that extent in a session is a worry. How do you structure your hand reviews? Do you have people outside of here that you discuss hands with?
People go really crazy on my HHs, sure that there's some bad hands here and I try to post every single bad one (even the smaller ones). But the truth is that everyone makes mistakes, there's one reg who 4-bet-called 98s vs me 100bb deep at 200z BTN vs CO and he is still playing there, it's so annoying to see that.
You're probably making repeated mistakes in smaller pots, as well as the big ones you post here.
Could fold pre, but if he isn't 4-betting AK it's a very good call imo. Some guys in the pool 4-bet only KK/AA for value and some bluffs while calling QQ/AK in these positions. I thought he didn't have AK in his range, so went for it.
What do you mean "imo"? it's either plus EV or it isn't...also if they have AK you have more potential to barrel them off their hand aside from increased eq vs range.
What do you mean "imo"? it's either plus EV or it isn't...also if they have AK you have more potential to barrel them off their hand aside from increased eq vs range.
You actually want AK in the range...
Your analysis would be accurate if villain had 0 bluffs, AK/QQ are 22 combos, KK/AA 12 combos, if villain doesn't have a way to control his bluffing frequency he will overbluff if he takes his AK/QQ combos out of his 4-bet range.
Just add some 12 combos of A2-A5s to both ranges and you will see my EV when villain has AA/KK inly for value I'm doing way better.
Spew is just a bad play with bad logic, you can make spews without being tilted imo. And I said I was tilted, just not on monkey tilt mode spazz vamo
You have to be really honest with yourself before making these statements.
Do you really spew when playing your A-game?
More likely you play bad while unfocused, tired or tilting. And that causes you the low winrate. Playing more of your A-game could easily be +1bb/100 to your zoom winrate.
Bad bluffs you were not sure about while playing the hand are a whole another thing, but your gut was telling you one thing and you didn't notice rest of the variables that make it a bad bluff.
Spew is like making a bad bluff while knowing its bad and not being able to put villain on a range, correct?
I think most people still make pretty substantial mistakes when playing their a-game. It isn't like your a-game is optimal it's just the best you play. I think spew is a strong word but a bad player (i.e. me) is still spewing when playing my a-game even if I'm not tilting.
River:(18.5 BB, 2 players) J Hero bets 91 BB and is all-in, MP calls 85.94 BB and is all-in
Spoiler:
Hero shows 7 T (Full House, Sevens full of Tens)
(Pre 19%, Flop 91%, Turn 95%) MP shows A A (Two Pair, Aces and Sevens)
(Pre 81%, Flop 9%, Turn 5%) Hero wins 186.38 BB
H2: vs 16/15 nit, not sure if this is any good, I'm folding all my Qx obv, can't see him valuebetting AQ and not sure about his bluffs. I called this in the last second, even vs that guy should we call? I feel like we block so much of his value range that if he has some bluffs it will be a +EV call, maybe he could be valuebetting KJ too, who knows
River:(68.92 BB, 2 players) J Hero checks, BTN bets 79.22 BB and is all-in, Hero calls 66.04 BB and is all-in
Spoiler:
BTN shows T 9 (Straight, Queen High)
(Pre 39%, Flop 52%, Turn 100%) Hero shows J A (Three of a Kind, Jacks)
(Pre 61%, Flop 48%, Turn 0%) BTN wins 197 BB
H3: highly effective monkey play by me, I used to think this was very bad(and it is vs good players), but vs 90% of the guys who play 50z it's gold. Also we can spot very easily most whales who never fold here. The only hard thing is to know which regs defend vs that imo. I used to make these plays a lot, then stopped after getting snapped by lots of people and came back to doing it but only with good selection
I think most people still make pretty substantial mistakes when playing their a-game. It isn't like your a-game is optimal it's just the best you play. I think spew is a strong word but a bad player (i.e. me) is still spewing when playing my a-game even if I'm not tilting.
There's varying levels of mistakes, you shouldn't be making the mistakes Rapid is making with his experience.
There's varying levels of mistakes, you shouldn't be making the mistakes Rapid is making with his experience.
Yeah I don't disagree but it is beating a dead horse expecting him to change. He's too stuck to his thought process which is hint of correctness with awful application.
Yeah I don't disagree but it is beating a dead horse expecting him to change. He's too stuck to his thought process which is hint of correctness with awful application.
I'm just sad he's not applying the tatsumaki move anymore.