25% is highest ev bet size there? lul

Why would it not be?

because ur drawing to the nuts in a srp and wanting to build the pot for max value rather than rivering the nuts and sitting there like a ****** in a 20bb pot?

Checking turn in H3 is absolutely unnecessary against unknown, you’d need very specific info for this play to yield more EV than simply barreling.

Right, so we want to bet full pot to build the pot for max value.

Thx for the good responses, guys. Didn't think of KTdd check as that bad because it needs 0 protection, so I was barreling all Qx and lower flushes. Recently I've decides to try to mimic pio in 3bp because I was losing a lot in 3bp, even fish were owning my soul, specially OOP.

In small spr spots I'm very bad.

But it makes sense, gotta valuebet in there.

And JJ was a punt fold, I didnt have enough data on the guy to make the fold, I wad ******ed to fold that but vs some guys its good to fold, just not that guy yet.

I expect that I will end up posting A LOT of misplays here from now on. I've been making a lot of bad plays but a lot of good calls at the same time, it's insane how much people bluff.

There's still much confusion in my mind, but all I can say is that I'm not afraid anymore. I used to be ashamed to make bad plays and show losing calls to villain/losing overbluffs/overcalls, now even though I'm making more ******ed plays, I think it's better to make ******ed plays but based on logic than to be afraid.

It's a way better to play and goes way better for the mental game, now I see how so many people at 100z mafe the most spewy plays and were capable of sleeping well after that. They do it because people are out of line in A LOT of spots.

Now when you're afraid to make bad plays you're always getting pushed around/won't make the maximum of every spot. And you're more likely to tilt/have a bad mental game.

Who are u talking to? Or educating the whole world again?
You are really slow. 2million hands and still havent figured out basic poker

Lul

Thx, man! Yeah, looking at results too often atm, should reduce that.

And I'm comfortable at 50z, no need to drop down.

It's funny that I've never been so confident before, I really believe that I will be able to take shots at 500z this year, it looks like I finally have the last piece of the puzzle figured out (stationing).

Sure that I had below-average results, but I was making a lot of mistakes and being very predictable, but even with those I was winning still at a 1.5-2bb winrate. So it's likely that I was making a lot of very good plays so that it could happen, like my huge overbets, sick insanely thin valuebets, sick hero folds(the good ones that were logic-based) and very good underbluffs.

I know the data I have only proves the opposite, but I really feel that this will be the year that I will end up playing 500z. Also nobody is capable of taking shots at 500z if they think they're not good enough for that game, right?

Btw, played magic yesterday, so will be free to play on friday and print vs those whales

Vaaaamoooo

Btw, WWSF is at 52 for the year so far!

You have finally reached peak delusion. You are posting how much of a station you are now and not scared yet your still folding JJ in 3bet pots on low boards to 50% turn cbet.

This is his thread, he can post what he likes.

JJ was a bad fold, but not as bad as you think: if villain is valuebetting AT it's bad, but if villain isn't, then it's probably a worse call than AK (unblocking the FD/BDFD), because it blocks FDs and double blocks all OESD which are all barreling turn a lot.

Hand strength alone isn't as important, specially vs humans, which by nature will always be very exploitable by blockers. Pio doesn't x back some AJhh ott only because it wants to protect its range on flush rivers, but also to deny OOP the option to undervalue JJ and overvalue hands like AK/pps unblocking FDs. It also wont bluff all FDs to avoid being imbalanced on flush rivers with too much value and few bluffs, as well as on brick rivers with too many bluff candidates for few value combos.

But pio probably goes way thinner, making JJ an easy call, but in some other spots it wont be like that

Vo2max posts here so much that this thread helped his english a lot. Just see his first posts, it didn't even look like english lol.

And all his posts are cursing me lol.

"Vs this player YOU SEE? J high flop and no clue" lol

Vaaaaaamooooo

lol just looked at his post history, he's obsessed with you. What a sad life.

Try to find one of his first posts in my thread, it's gold. He said that I played like a trained monkey and that the factory I was working on would rip me off my pension + some other things lol

hahaha ****in mirage and his lvl 1 thinking

For some reason you keep thinking that higher WWSF = better.

The optimal WWSF is probably around 48, so having it at 52 is just as bad as having it at 44...

optimal wwsf is more like 50 though

going to show ur graph yet? didnt think so. lul

50 is based on what research? Large database analysis of winning regs or stats of HS crushers?

Go back to bbv.

It's possible to be a crusher with 45 wwsf and 55 wwsf, it all depends on how loose preflop you are and how your opponents's tendencies are on average.

Just pointing out that with pio strats and calling more my wwsf got higher, my wsd as well, and my wtsd too. Basically it looks that I'm making villains fold more often the best hand than before and valueowning myself way less.