This is what I don't understand - you raise trash all the time, then you just call with your sets? That is so easy to exploit. In fact, any reg with half a brain who has read this thread can see that whenever you fast play, 95% of the time you have air. When you slowplay, 95% of the time it's the nuts. Very easy to play against someone who does that.
In before a big wall of text full of nothingness trying to justify your actions.
Why does anyone still come in here and try and give advice, he didn’t listen to brokenstars he won’t listen to anybody, is a waste of time.
I understand mirage commenting because he has no life or friends and likes to take it out on people on the internet but clearly most have moved on from posting in here.
equity is not the main thing when it comes to who gets to bet and what sizing. it's overall ev. if ip has way more nut combos, then oop just doesn't get to bet
there's a toygame where oop has JJ-99 and ip has QQ+, 77-33 on 222 flop. oop has 57% equity but big ev disadvantage and doesnt get to bet on any street and actually just c/f flop all the time if you give ip big enough betsizes and ability to jam rivers
Thanks! So my theory is wrong, tough to know that, but it makes sense since IP can extract more value with his range.
Quote:
Originally Posted by SlavaGZ
I really can´t understand why you play thes crazy loose ranges preflop, 22 is not a std CO open raise... Imagine when you open it early, other guy 3bet you and other guy farha, it sames a joke xDDDD
The more players in the pot, more tight you need be bc you play vs more ranges
And not justifi your call bc setmining, you have suficient experience now for know it is a ****
Simply make solid preflop ranges and respect it, stop play 22 bc "xploit", try exploit any tendencie in btn, but not in MP... and try not to be afraid of being too nit, If there are more people in the pot you have to be tighter
22 is solid, PPs are very strong hands, specially when I'm playing with them haha!
That's something I've even said to brokenstars I wouldn't change: how I play with those 22-66. A good amount of the pool hate to fold vs me, so those hands overrealize when I flop a set, also my spider senses help me to avoid coolers too in spots villains aren't bluffing enough.
This is what I don't understand - you raise trash all the time, then you just call with your sets? That is so easy to exploit. In fact, any reg with half a brain who has read this thread can see that whenever you fast play, 95% of the time you have air. When you slowplay, 95% of the time it's the nuts. Very easy to play against someone who does that.
In before a big wall of text full of nothingness trying to justify your actions.
Yeah, it's so easy to exploit me that I must be lucky to not be busto after so many hands. In the first hand I already said it was a mistake, in the second I could raise small repping a mergy range OTF, but with one player behind(all regs) I see merit of playing my range as a call, specially IP.
Thanks! So my theory is wrong, tough to know that, but it makes sense since IP can extract more value with his range.
22 is solid, PPs are very strong hands, specially when I'm playing with them haha!
That's something I've even said to brokenstars I wouldn't change: how I play with those 22-66. A good amount of the pool hate to fold vs me, so those hands overrealize when I flop a set, also my spider senses help me to avoid coolers too in spots villains aren't bluffing enough.
When I rfi from utg/mp, my 22-77 are making more than AQo, KQo, AJo, all A2s-ATs, more than all SCs. And half of the sample of close to 500k hands was played on 100z-200z(but arguments can be made that they would overtealize at 100z). Basically it cpuld be translated that the hand rankings for me would be AA-KK>AK/QQ>88-JJ>suited broadways>22-77>rest of hands.
It could be that I overbluff with SCs and Axs suited and when I'm playing pps I don't bluff much and only valuebet when I hit a set, so it makes sense that they should overrealize. Also my bluffcatching skills were bad, which hurt Axs hands and KQo/AQo.
Pay for coaching, ignore for ego. At least you're consistent in who's advice you listen to (ie: no one's).
You lost 70% of your roll last month by not getting exploited easily, got it. Busto soon enough. But don't worry buddy, you'll get there.
I listened to most of his advice, I don't play with pps like that because of ego,but because i think it's +EV. In theory they perform poorly ofc, but when you put into the equation that most of the people in the pool don't like making explo folds, don't raise flop enough and don't bluff enough; those pps perform way better. Also most people have 0 idea of how tight they should be postflop in mw pots, some guys stackoff with bottom 2p 150bb deep. Also with my image there's great value in flopping sets, since some regs were calling me down with A high vs a x/r b jam
Quote:
Originally Posted by Xenoblade
yea don't call 22 from CO vs early, you're not making money there, unless there is a giant whale who punts postflop sitting in the bb
In my sample those small pps are winning on every position when I CC/RFI, even in SB which is the worst position to do that. People don't squeeze enough. I think it's winning at 40bb/100 when I cc IP. If you want I can post the graphs in the spots you think are bad to call/rfi.
yeah I'm also starting to wonder where do your losses come from if all of your marginal plays are winning?
I don't know, my guess would be of random tilt, maybe overbluffs vs some people, also I overfolded in close to all spots, just recently I've started calling people down. Also I was playing with 100bbs, which limited my winrate a lot, which is terrible in an environment where rake is abysmal. I was paying 8bb/7bb/5.6bb on 50z/100z/200z, it's hard to cover such a big rake.
Here is my graph of when I cc 22-77 IP
Now some hands, will post player names so you know that they aren't whales, I've already took out all whales from the sample, just showing how the worst case scenario can be(vs regs)
H1: overbetting that turn should trigger some alarm bells
River:(45.33 BB, 2 players) A kiljusieppo checks, Rapidesh123 bets 78.09 BB and is all-in, kiljusieppo calls 78.09 BB
Spoiler:
Rapidesh123 shows 2 2 (Full House, Twos full of Aces)
(Pre 53%, Flop 96%, Turn 100%) kiljusieppo shows A K (Three of a Kind, Aces)
(Pre 47%, Flop 4%, Turn 0%) Rapidesh123 wins 200.13 BB
H2: by people range checking flop, those setmines get an extra card, so it adds a lot into the math of that, back in 2011 people were cbetting too much, so our pps wouldn't see many free turns.
Yet in all the hundreds of thousands of hands you have played you dont have a positive winrate.
Hmmmmmmm
I'm winning at close to 2bbev/100 over 500k hands. Not crushing, but not as bad as you say, also I used to reset stacks when ai hit 110bbs, so lost 0.5bbev/100 because of that, because I was playing a lot less utg than I should
at first I thought oro's line was a punt but I mean it's not all that bad, he is blocking 99 and charging a lot of draws, getting called by sets and combo draws only.. so I could see this shove working out better than we would expect it at first glance
at first I thought oro's line was a punt but I mean it's not all that bad, he is blocking 99 and charging a lot of draws, getting called by sets and combo draws only.. so I could see this shove working out better than we would expect it at first glance
If you add to the fact that most of the popuation fastplay their sets otf, it could be printing like crazy. But as spinmerightround said, I'm too easy to exploit. Even though it looks I'm spewy and bad with my plays, vs some people I was very careful with how I played. Vs most people it's not a big deal to never call sets otf, it's not like hakkazilla will pull this one off out of nowhere vs me, but vs people who are good enough to do that, calling flop has its merits.
H3, your flop call 3 way on that wet flop is terrible. that whale still would have paid you if you raised it up. You butchered the sets on the previous page also. You can't even play sets properly.
Quote:
at first I thought oro's line was a punt but I mean it's not all that bad, he is blocking 99 and charging a lot of draws, getting called by sets and combo draws only.. so I could see this shove working out better than we would expect it at first glance
Really? Hes repping T9, and a whole bunch of draws, Id call him down with any pair there. The fact hes apparently one of the biggest winners on 200z just shows what a joke variance and 200z is.
Let me get this straight... This thread is full of probably a thousand or so hands where Rapidesh colossally spewed off his entire stack in the name of lol explo and now we're surprised that he got called light 4 times with sets?
Played close to 3k hands today, played well at least, but it's so annoying to run bad, also I've made some mistakes, but it's hard to play that many hands without any, I feel like I get so punished for my mistakes, meh.
Worst hands of the day
H1: this is the worst of the day because I almost folded this, so ******ed, luckly I went into the lobby and saw he was 1-tabling, he was a 18/9 guy over 100 hands, he 3-bet only once.
fold, fold, fold, BTN raises to 3 BB, Hero raises to 15 BB, BB raises to 42 BB, fold, Hero raises to 241.68 BB and is all-in, BB calls 76.34 BB and is all-in
Flop:(239.68 BB, 2 players) 7 9 T
Turn:(239.68 BB, 2 players) A
River:(239.68 BB, 2 players) 5 Players agreed to run it twice.
Flop #2:(239.68 BB, 2 players) T 3 5
Turn #2:(239.68 BB, 2 players) K
River #2:(239.68 BB, 2 players) 2
Spoiler:
Hero shows K K (One Pair, Kings)
Board #1 (Pre 70%, Flop 85%, Turn 2%)
(Three of a Kind, Kings)
Board #2 (Pre 75%, Flop 86%, Turn 100%)
H2: my sizing OTR is ******ed, even in theory it isn't that good, because villain is protected OTR with some Ax, also because this sizing doesn't force many mistakes by him, if he calls with Ax only he won't be making a big mistake, while if he did the same vs a 75% sizing, it would be bad. Imo my river sizings should be between 25%-100% and also having a jamming range, 2x pot does poorly for my value and my bluffs.
Hero shows 9 K (Three of a Kind, Tens)
(Pre 39%, Flop 2%, Turn 0%) BTN shows J A (Full House, Tens full of Aces)
(Pre 61%, Flop 98%, Turn 100%) BTN wins 56.86 BB
H3: terrible, just spew, decided to do that because saw that he was 3-betting Q3s, but if he is ******ed enough to do that, then he can jam with any garbage too
fold, fold, fold, Hero raises to 2.32 BB, SB raises to 9.2 BB, fold, Hero raises to 26 BB, fold
Hero wins 19.4 BB
H4: I'm not sure if this is bad or not, what do you do here vs an unknown? Vs whales I jam OTF, but vs an unknown I was a pussy in there, should I consider that villain is a whale for potting flop and jam anyway? Anyone folding turn? I've decided to call because thought villain wouldn't valuebet KK+ there
Hero raises to 2.32 BB, fold, CO calls 2.32 BB, fold, fold, fold
Flop:(6.14 BB, 2 players) K 8 3 Hero bets 1.52 BB, CO raises to 10.4 BB, fold
CO wins 8.72 BB
H6: good fold? Thought villain would bet most of his flushes OTT, also I'm not sure if he would value-raise them OTR, on top of that, all his 98s play like that
Turn:(39.9 BB, 2 players) A Hero checks, BTN checks
River:(39.9 BB, 2 players) 9 Hero bets 28.42 BB, BTN raises to 414.74 BB and is all-in, fold
BTN wins 92.74 BB
h7: OTT it's quite ambitious, but villain was overfolding there, OTR I think it's ok to explo bluff there for 2x pot. He tanked for a lot of time and called this, which is actually a better call than the nut flush imo(if I'm valuebetting FHs only). If he tanked that much before calling this, I think I have a +EV bluff here, because most of his TP will snap fold.
Somehow I doubt you're actually asking anyone. You should start replacing the question marks with periods.
Quote:
H1: this is the worst of the day because I almost folded this, so ******ed, luckly I went into the lobby and saw he was 1-tabling, he was a 18/9 guy over 100 hands, he 3-bet only once.
What did you learn from the bolded? Did that really sway your decision one way or the other? Had you folded this hand, you'd have shown it proudly and said "H1: good fold?" and then defended it to the death itt.
Somehow I doubt you're actually asking anyone. You should start replacing the question marks with periods.
What did you learn from the bolded? Did that really sway your decision one way or the other? Had you folded this hand, you'd have shown it proudly and said "H1: good fold?" and then defended it to the death itt.
Was gonna comment on the rest but what a waste.
yeah, I'm a stubborn person and would probably have done that, but we're people, we all make mistakes. It's easier to point out my mistakes because I expose myself here, actually even more because I'm looking for misplays to post them.
poker is such a tough game, I feel I'm never going to move up from 50z again.
H8: vs reg, looks very spewy, but imo it's a very strong play and this prints vs a lot of people. First of all, we have a lot of incentive to just jam here because a lot of people overbluff OTT, second, most of their value range isn't super comfortable calling in there, also we have very few bluff candidates(KQo) and many value combos. In fact, I think most people underbluff like crazy when they jam turn like that. Also in theory 77 is jamming in there a good amount, right?(if IP decides to have a jamming range in there).
fold, fold, CO raises to 2.5 BB, Hero raises to 8 BB, fold, fold, CO calls 5.5 BB
Flop:(17.5 BB, 2 players) 3 T Q
CO checks, Hero bets 8.64 BB, CO calls 8.64 BB
Turn:(34.78 BB, 2 players) 2
CO checks, Hero bets 17.18 BB, CO calls 17.18 BB
River:(69.14 BB, 2 players) 9
CO checks, Hero bets 164.44 BB and is all-in, fold
Hero wins 65.68 BB
H10: vs probable fish, OTR we can't fold ever, right? The thing here is that he snap jam river and his turn sizing was looking like AA or a bluff a lot, or the nut flush. But meh, fish do so many stupid plays that it's hard to justify folding the straight here.
H11: explo sizing OTT by me vs nitfish, his call OTR is so atrocious lol. Vs decent opponents I`m jamming turn with the hands I want to jam, but I found out that those small bets with the nuts make it easier to get stacks in OTR by luring weak players into calling, while in fact, small bets are on average stronger
River:(112.78 BB, 2 players) Q Hero bets 116.18 BB and is all-in, MP calls 72.34 BB and is all-in
Spoiler:
Hero shows J J (Full House, Jacks full of Tens)
(Pre 18%, Flop 84%, Turn 95%) MP shows K K (Two Pair, Kings and Tens)
(Pre 82%, Flop 16%, Turn 5%) Hero wins 253.46 BB
H12: playing deep is so fun, his 5-bet is so bad, with that sizing he shouldn`t have a folding range and he should play his range as a call vs my 4-bet, right?
Hero raises to 2.32 BB, MP raises to 9 BB, fold, fold, fold, fold, Hero raises to 31 BB, MP raises to 82 BB, fold
MP wins 63.5 BB
H13: monkey play by me, it`s bad imo, better to just call, even folding looks better on this texture, the problem is that villain`s AQ/AK will have a lot of equity vs me on this texture, better to do it on J9x