New GTO is going to develop where you have to unfold your hand with BS to balance your nutted unfolds
it's quite funny to play those unfold pots with the people in there, I was getting it in with 7 high, no draw, no redraw and was scooping the pot a lot, then people started fighting like crazy haha, so AJo was a sick unfold on paired boards, basically a valuebet!
It's also fun to see people in the normal pots looking at unfold pots getting bigger than normal ones LOL! All raked obv, someone in stars development team got a sallary raise for sure after that.
Nice try. Except there is no way for you to know anything about me.
So yeah. Try again Xeno.
Why would someone who is good spend their time on the internet belittling people and tell them how bad they are/constantly put people down? Now I don't know anything about your poker skill but I'm curious as to why you always trash other people and tell them they're bad.
Also you know that brokenstars has made quite alot of money from poker this year right (I'm guessing you're going to mention something about volume?).
Doesn't mean he's good, but he's clearly doing something right....
Why would someone who is good spend their time on the internet belittling people and tell them how bad they are/constantly put people down? Now I don't know anything about your poker skill but I'm curious as to why you always trash other people and tell them they're bad.
Also you know that brokenstars has made quite alot of money from poker this year right (I'm guessing you're going to mention something about volume?).
Doesn't mean he's good, but he's clearly doing something right....
+1
I cant understand how can someone say brokenstars is bad. He is crushing 200 zone for 8bb/100 over a big sample. A lot of regs would be very happy to have half that winrate.
Why would someone who is good spend their time on the internet belittling people and tell them how bad they are/constantly put people down? Now I don't know anything about your poker skill but I'm curious as to why you always trash other people and tell them they're bad.
Also you know that brokenstars has made quite alot of money from poker this year right (I'm guessing you're going to mention something about volume?).
Doesn't mean he's good, but he's clearly doing something right....
I trash Rapidesh cause he's the most arrogant trashcan on this forum. Thinks he's a walking solver but, and this is literally going by his own posts, he has no clue what he is doing.
The idea of getting coaching from someone who has a 230k hand sample on the softest site out there is beyond ******ed.
If you can't see this, you probably should get the coaching.
H2: vs unknown/whale, I got kinda afraid of the min-raise OTF, but the turn sizing made me happy. Quite funny to see that min-raises aren't always 2p+, but they're hands fish are excited about getting in.
H4: hand happened in an unfoldem table, so will have to write it in the live poker style
Had 98o in the BB, folded to the whale, he raised to 3x from the SB, I 3-bet(can't call and lose the antes to the unfold pot, better to play 3-bet or fold), he called, flop was
T85r, I check back, turn was a 3r, he bet 75%, I called, river was another 3, he overbet jam for 2x pot.
Called, he had 45o lol. It's such a sick call for me, I'm such a pussy, insane to get that many bbs with that hand
H5: I always post when I'm right with my sick pre-flop folds, gotta post when I'm wrong too haha. RFI was a 17/10, the guy that 3-bet him was somewhat tight, but he was a reg and I expected him to be super tight vs him.
fold, MP raises to 3 BB, CO raises to 10.5 BB, fold, fold, fold, MP calls 7.5 BB
Flop:(22.5 BB, 2 players) 8 9 Q MP bets 3 BB, CO raises to 21.07 BB, MP raises to 69.41 BB and is all-in, CO calls 48.34 BB
Turn:(161.32 BB, 2 players) 4
River:(161.32 BB, 2 players) 5
Spoiler:
MP shows T J (Straight, Queen High)
(Pre 39%, Flop 92%, Turn 100%) CO shows A Q (One Pair, Queens)
(Pre 61%, Flop 8%, Turn 0%) MP wins 159.95 BB
H6: vs whale, I think it's such a big leak of mine, I should never jam here, right? He looked quite aggro, so by raising I would take out a lot of his bluffs, right? Also vs a whale going nuts I can call on close to all rivers, right? That's something I've never learned how to do, meh.
I trash Rapidesh cause he's the most arrogant trashcan on this forum. Thinks he's a walking solver but, and this is literally going by his own posts, he has no clue what he is doing.
The idea of getting coaching from someone who has a 230k hand sample on the softest site out there is beyond ******ed.
If you can't see this, you probably should get the coaching.
Lol at you saying Im arrogant, Ive said a million times I dont think Im that good and I rarely say a reg is bad. And you say ignition is soft, why dont you grind there then?And imo there isnt such a thing as "soft site" this game is so tough that even playing a player pool that is making a lot of mistakes is hard to win big. Im not even sure if I could beat 25z on stars by more than 4bb.
SB shows 6 A (Full House, Sixes full of Aces)
(Pre 61%, Flop 72%, Turn 82%) Hero mucks K 3 (One Pair, Sixes)
(Pre 39%, Flop 28%, Turn 18%) SB wins 44.96 BB
H8: vs reg that was folding a lot OTF, maybe it's good to just fold turn? OTR I have more Jx, so I don't think AQ goes that thin, so would it be a decent call? I'm such a pussy. Should I call river? I think that call-fold is worse than just fold turn and worse than call-call, specially vs his sizing OTT
River:(73.58 BB, 2 players) 2 Hero bets 63.96 BB and is all-in, fold
Hero wins 72.21 BB
Ended up looking at the results, whenever I join an unfoldem table I get spoilers anyway, so didn't see anything wrong in looking at them. So far have played close to 7k zoom hands and I think probably >4k unfoldem hands, so volume is very good so far!
0.83bbev/100 at 200z so far over 73k hands lol breakeven haha. But I've ran poorly in non-all-in spots, variance is so big, let's see how it goes after more hands. Also I'm improving my game on a lot of areas, finally started making some sick calls
Spoiler:
winrate in $ is 3.5bb/100 vaaaaaaaamo
Last edited by Rapidesh123; 08-07-2018 at 09:30 PM.
You should explain your thought process as well, with the lol flop XR. Looks like rapid out whaled you there. He probably thinks gutters have the same equity as open enders.
I trash Rapidesh cause he's the most arrogant trashcan on this forum. Thinks he's a walking solver but, and this is literally going by his own posts, he has no clue what he is doing.
The idea of getting coaching from someone who has a 230k hand sample on the softest site out there is beyond ******ed.
If you can't see this, you probably should get the coaching.
h8. prob need to call some Ax, depends on villain bluffs on river. if he bluffs 44-22 then a4 is bad, if he bluffs k10s, q10s then a4 call is probably fine. i would literally just default to folding if player isn't that aggro and call if he is.
I trash Rapidesh cause he's the most arrogant trashcan on this forum. Thinks he's a walking solver but, and this is literally going by his own posts, he has no clue what he is doing.
The idea of getting coaching from someone who has a 230k hand sample on the softest site out there is beyond ******ed.
If you can't see this, you probably should get the coaching.
he doesn't strike me as arrogant at all, you sound way more arrogant than he does fwiw
I trash Rapidesh cause he's the most arrogant trashcan on this forum. Thinks he's a walking solver but, and this is literally going by his own posts, he has no clue what he is doing.
The idea of getting coaching from someone who has a 230k hand sample on the softest site out there is beyond ******ed.
If you can't see this, you probably should get the coaching.
+1
I cant understand how can someone say brokenstars is bad. He is crushing 200 zone for 8bb/100 over a big sample. A lot of regs would be very happy to have half that winrate.
I said on your stream I was trolling because you were streaming, so I like to make some bad plays just to mess with you to make some fun highlights haha. But it wasnt because of that only.
OTT the call is pretty marginal and depends on a lot of stuff for it to become +ev. In a vaccuum its obviously bad. If you think about my range and how dry the board is, if I only continue turn with AK/AQ, 2p+ and FDs, there will be some rivers I will underbluff like crazy and will allow you to explo x/f a lot. As an example: if the river is a club without pairing the board, if you check and I valuebet trips+, then I will have to turn my AK into a bluff to deny you the option of always folding your 2p.
The thing is that AK will win the pot already a lot of the time vs your give ups, so the EV of checking is already high, so I dont have that much incentive to turn it into a bluff, becaise I dont know if you will realise on those rivers I will have close to 0 natural bluffs available to me.
By calling some naked gutshots, I will be capable of having natural bluffs on those rivers, as well as winning the pot vs your give ups on bricks and sucking out 9% of the time too.
That play ws based on the assumption you would overfold on those rivers, also on this one too, with QK I would have bluff raised river in that pot expecting you to fold 2p. Which turned to be a very wrong play on my part because you ended up calling it.
Vs my strategy your call is +ev, because Im not sure if I valuebet AK there, maybe? Also because I have these bluffs population wont have. But vs population its better to bet-fold, because people wont bluff with clubs in there and will easily underbluff in that spot.
You should explain your thought process as well, with the lol flop XR. Looks like rapid out whaled you there. He probably thinks gutters have the same equity as open enders.
Lmfao at thinking we don't xr AJo on this board at a medium freq. You're so far behind the curve you can't even see it any more!
Spoiler:
in b4 mirage and his usual "oh but you're busto!" "ahh gazzybusto with his terrible poker chat" etc etc such a jealous guy
The thing is that AK will win the pot already a lot of the time vs your give ups, so the EV of checking is already high, so I dont have that much incentive to turn it into a bluff, becaise I dont know if you will realise on those rivers I will have close to 0 natural bluffs available to me.
You don't need to have bluffs in your range when you're the one that's completely capped.
When opponent checks on a blank river in this spot, it's fine for him to fold 100% vs any bet, since he shouldn't really be checking any value hands.
One of the reasons why TQ could be a decent call OTT is that you're beating most of his bluffs and have decent SDV.
You don't need to have bluffs in your range when you're the one that's completely capped.
When opponent checks on a blank river in this spot, it's fine for him to fold 100% vs any bet, since he shouldn't really be checking any value hands.
One of the reasons why TQ could be a decent call OTT is that you're beating most of his bluffs and have decent SDV.
How am I capped if I have all sets and only I could have the nuts?
And its not fine for villain to fold 100% of his range OTR after he checks(unless he is jamming river 90%+), if he is checking 30% and always folding when he checks, then I can call any2 ott and show up with a profit.
And imo there isnt such a thing as "soft site" this game is so tough that even playing a player pool that is making a lot of mistakes is hard to win big.
How do you write essays on how to exploit people. But then also manage to say stuff like this?
Quote:
Originally Posted by JYamada
Hi Smitdude
I have never been called Smitdude before. But funnily enough I know him irl and like him, so thanks I guess? Oh fwiw, essentially anyone worth knowing on this site can confirm I am not Smitdude.
Quote:
Originally Posted by Rapidesh123
I said on your stream I was trolling because you were streaming, so I like to make some bad plays just to mess with you to make some fun highlights haha. But it wasnt because of that only.
OTT the call is pretty marginal and depends on a lot of stuff for it to become +ev. In a vaccuum its obviously bad. If you think about my range and how dry the board is, if I only continue turn with AK/AQ, 2p+ and FDs, there will be some rivers I will underbluff like crazy and will allow you to explo x/f a lot. As an example: if the river is a club without pairing the board, if you check and I valuebet trips+, then I will have to turn my AK into a bluff to deny you the option of always folding your 2p.
The thing is that AK will win the pot already a lot of the time vs your give ups, so the EV of checking is already high, so I dont have that much incentive to turn it into a bluff, becaise I dont know if you will realise on those rivers I will have close to 0 natural bluffs available to me.
By calling some naked gutshots, I will be capable of having natural bluffs on those rivers, as well as winning the pot vs your give ups on bricks and sucking out 9% of the time too.
That play ws based on the assumption you would overfold on those rivers, also on this one too, with QK I would have bluff raised river in that pot expecting you to fold 2p. Which turned to be a very wrong play on my part because you ended up calling it.
Vs my strategy your call is +ev, because Im not sure if I valuebet AK there, maybe? Also because I have these bluffs population wont have. But vs population its better to bet-fold, because people wont bluff with clubs in there and will easily underbluff in that spot.
Could've just said ''Standard hand is standard'' but nope. Rapidesh had to go full ****** once again.