H1: this guy out of nowhere started going bananas vs me, it's the second time he came with these huge overbets out of nowhere and I haven't seen him fold in each of the 5 hands we played today lol. I have 0 clue on what he is doing this with haha.
River:(5.76 BB, 2 players) 6
SB checks, Hero bets 2.84 BB, SB raises to 97.62 BB and is all-in, fold
SB wins 10.86 BB
H2: same guy lol, he probably had it this time I think, my hand is terrible to bluff the river imo, but I will struggle to find lots of bluffs in there, still won't go nuts OTR vs this tilted guy. I think my flop raise was bad vs him given my read
H4: vs reg with 22 WTSD, the last times I jammed OTR for thin value with KK/AA/AQ villains always snapped me with the nuts =(
Was even second-guessing myself if my valuebets were good
Hero shows T T (One Pair, Tens)
(Pre 82%, Flop 92%, Turn 95%) CO mucks 9 9 (One Pair, Nines)
(Pre 18%, Flop 8%, Turn 5%) Hero wins 65.74 BB
H6: vs very tight player, His range is probably QQ+/AK+, my call pre-flop is terrible, I thought I had good odds even vs that range but he got me with his marketing sizing -.-
OTT I think I don't have the odds to call vs that guy
If you asked me what I'd call a Brazilian who goes into space without a suit I'd say rapidesh123.
Tbh a better comparison is that Rapi is the type of guy who did a module on space whilst at uni and has worn a space suit every day since because even though it makes his day to day life infinitely harder he can't get exploited if he ends up in space.
H2: ul and quiet annoying if these people have it every time
H3: nh
H4: i think i just give up this combo OTR, u still beat some T9s and KTs combos on very low freq. and some other backdoors.
H5: i choose between 50-100% on these textures especially multiways
H6: yeah fold pre. vs obv range i think we need to fold turns which i kinda meehh but a flopzilla sim would be interesting
H7: nh, u bet turns without Ah?
H4: yeah, it's best to give up and bluff with diamonds, I sometimes go too far with overbluffs, meh.
H5: mw I use my weird equity denial strat that I developed some 400k hands ago, it's very simple and easy to play. I'm not sure if it performs well but it's very consistent and has some good reasonings behind it + some plans on different turns
H7: I check all AK/AA OTT, vs whales I think it's best to get some extra from their bluffs. But betting turn to x/c river bricks looks good too, not sure on this texture
Tbh a better comparison is that Rapi is the type of guy who did a module on space whilst at uni and has worn a space suit every day since because even though it makes his day to day life infinitely harder he can't get exploited if he ends up in space.
Then I met finland and learned how cavemen play poker haha
Tbh a better comparison is that Rapi is the type of guy who did a module on space whilst at uni and has worn a space suit every day since because even though it makes his day to day life infinitely harder he can't get exploited if he ends up in space.
2 table zoom is like 6 reg tables, its totally fine you ****in ****
I know what it is and its mediocre for an experienced player. Most regs play 4 or 3 tables. 2 tabling should ensure your playing A game and making less mistakes, which makes rapids hands even more hilarious when you consider this IS actually his A game. lul.
why do you only 2 table? thats pathetic, at least 3 table.
Mma said it's better to focus on getting better, with 2 tables it's easier not to auto pilot.
Also I can't keep up with the speed easily, misread boards a lot/play worse.
Btw, got 68% in the last test I did for the government job! Getting better! Still not enough to pass. I'm almost finishing studying all the subjects at least once after more than 1.5 years lol.
I feel like in 1 year I will have decent chances to pass and they take from 3 months to 24 months to call people to start working, so I will be a full time poker pro for that time period haha! I hope I'm not at 50z when that happens.
Last edited by Rapidesh123; 02-20-2019 at 07:38 AM.
That line might seem funny to you, but rapid was folding there 100% of his range. If that guy was bluffing there, it was a really good play imo.
Not exactly, I've started calling some huge overbets, if I had the Ah and a pair I think I could see myself calling. His bluff needs to work 93% to be +EV, if he keeps making those ******ed plays and I catch wtf he is doing it could be terrible.
But I think he actually had the nuts in there. That 18 vpip guy wouldn't pull this off easily as a bluff
Also even if he was bluffing 100% in there, sure that he will print vs me in that spot, but his thought process that lead him into making that play will cost him way more in other spots
Not exactly, I've started calling some huge overbets, if I had the Ah and a pair I think I could see myself calling. His bluff needs to work 93% to be +EV, if he keeps making those ******ed plays and I catch wtf he is doing it could be terrible.
But I think he actually had the nuts in there. That 18 vpip guy wouldn't pull this off easily as a bluff
Also even if he was bluffing 100% in there, sure that he will print vs me in that spot, but his thought process that lead him into making that play will cost him way more in other spots
That play is actually optimal, since you never have the nuts there and you are close to never 3betting vs a normal check raise I assume. He should do this sometimes with Ax and Tx bluffs and with the straights. A9 could be a good bluff here imo.
Anyways, I expect most people to fold more than 93% here. If people defend optimally, you still extract most value with your nuts this way.
Also, I think that you are full of sh*t when you say that you weren't folding 100% there in that moment. I'd fold 100% too Maybe I'd tank with A blocker, but in the end I'd find a fold.
The first hero calls of mt life were vs 4x pot overbets, since I'm a fan of blockers I see myself calling Ah since he wouldn't valuebet Kh in there (but he should, every flush in fact and all sets).
But he shouldn't have that many flushes in there. Just because I don't have flushes it doesn't mean I can't call, we protect x ranges to protect ourselves from valuebets, not bluffs. Any bluffcatcher will be +EV vs overbluffs, don't need a flush in there to call him down.
Hand 3 where u ob shove AT On 7778K - what’s ur reasoning? If u answered this sorry. It’s quite a bit up.
Also I know a lot of ppl troll but good job on getting to 100-200nl on stars zoom.
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
In theory should have very few Kx/quads and I will have lots of Kx and AA, so my range wants to extract max value off his Tx and force him to call with those for an uncomfortable sizing.
In practice I jammed because people are pussies and even whales fold vs 4x pots lol. Also some people get excited with quads and minraise turn, so some players will have 0 auto-calls in there
Thanks, man! Yeah, some people only see the bad parts of things, getting to 200z was cool, I hope I'm back there this year.