30.10.18:
Volumes looking okay, not so happy w my game today, felt like I auto-piloted a lot of spots.
H1:
https://www.weaktight.com/h/5bd8b0edd3904338398b4776
Readless (iirc). Needing 41% equity to BE this spot seemed pretty close. We have just 35% equity vs a range of KQs (3 combo's), QQ (3), & a few combo draws (JT, J9, T9hh). If we were to throw in just 1 combo AK our equity jumps to 40% making a call close to BE, 2 combo's AK and were making a profitable call w 45% eq.
AK is ofc optimistic to include in Vs range. Thoughts on spot/range applied? BC could straight up just be a bit of a spew tbh, guess I just don't like folding AA
H2:
https://www.weaktight.com/h/5bd8b314d3904338398b47d9
Don't think we can make the fold OTR(?)
H3:
https://www.weaktight.com/h/5bd8b393d39043900e8b47d7
V (BTN) known fish. CB possibly questionable 4-way, obv Xing a tonne (TPs etc.) BDFD taken into account when CBing.
H4:
https://www.weaktight.com/h/5bd8b453d39043900e8b4808
Hand seems poorly played due to passive nature, but analyzing each street individually think I'm quite okay w play, or at least when reviewing through a 'theory' based approach. Most questionable street for me is prob OTF, unsure if this is a spot we want to utilize the 1/3 range B. X OTT as pretty sure our range wants to X a lot on the middle card pairing turn & this is going to easily be one of my weakest FDs (fwiw, also few relevant blockers to Vs Axs). Thoughts?
Quote:
Originally Posted by ZKesic
hey,
how long have you been playing online poker and which stakes, if I may ask?
What's good! Playing for around 2ys, spent perhaps 1y playing CGs semi-seriously (term used loosely). Worked through micro's NL2-25z. Beaten/progressed through NL2/5-16z a few times.
Quote:
Originally Posted by ZKesic
You could consider moving down to 10nl for a bit, at least until you learn to play more tables at once. Playing high volume is how the money is made at micros imo.
Even if you become one of the best 25nl players, with 300hands/hr you can't expect to ever make more than 5 USD/hr.
Def not considering moving down rn. I have played more tables (3/4z) in the past, but spent some time recently focusing on quality of play w less emphasis on quantity, and now rebuilding in terms of volume/tables.
Dropping down seems unnecessary for volume improvement.
Also not really looking @ $/hr as intending to continue to progress in terms limit, WR, volume etc. Don't perceive poker in any way as a job rn also, so again not focused on $/hr.
Thx for HH reviews!
Quote:
Originally Posted by WorldzMine
He can build a bankroll and move up though. I always wonder why people say these things without considering that's what most people are trying to do, not grind the micro's for the rest of their lives.
ya, somewhat accurate for me (in terms of BR building & moving up).
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=QTYR-mmhRTU