Quote:
Originally Posted by ZKesic
12k hand sample is nothing. It would be possible to run even much better in that amount of hands.
27bb/100 isn't achievable long term anywhere, especially in speed/zoom games. Best crushers are making 2-4bb/100 over large samples. It isn't realistic to expect more.
Once you play 50k hands, you'll see that your winrate will be in a single digit (you'll hit some "downswings"). Once you play 100k hands, you'll get a winrate that is close to your "true" WR.
Don't leave your job mate. I've seen way too many people doing that and then going broke with poker. Poker players always feel like their upswings are their "true" winrate, get way too much confidence, and then lose it all in a few "downswings".
If you really want to make money with poker, It's much easier to do it playing regular cash games (more fish there, regs play worse and you can game select). +You won't ever be able to move up in stakes where you're playing right now, as you probably know.
Just my 2c
Thanks for the feedback. Much appreciated.
I really feel that these games are weak af. I literally see people losing value with their mistakes on a minute to minute basis, and people getting WAY out of line bc how much can it mean with only £20 on the line and maybe they get frustrated/bored.
Yeah my local cash game plays very oddly, some really poor aggro fish that completely inflate/distort the game sometimes. although the rake is 10% half the time (5% off peak). I pop down sometimes anyway, will be doing so more in the near future.
The last few days Ive really been wanting to play as much as possible, your 50k/100k sample suggestions have only made that more of a reality. Ill post a recap at each of those milestones!!