Open Side Menu Go to the Top
Register
Moving Up Stakes, 2015 and beyond Moving Up Stakes, 2015 and beyond

02-23-2018 , 12:39 AM
Smart Maths ITT

Keeping those eng job skills sharp I seeMoving Up Stakes, 2015 and beyond


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
02-23-2018 , 12:39 AM
What rake have you paid in terms of bb/100 at 200?
02-23-2018 , 12:44 AM
Quote:
Originally Posted by andees10
What rake have you paid in terms of bb/100 at 200?
I've paid almost exactly (40c off) $13k in ~90k hands @ 200z

This is a bit over -7bb/100 rake


For my 200reg sample its 7.8, but looser play and more short handed makes that number make sense.
02-23-2018 , 04:34 AM
Quote:
Originally Posted by TheTyman9
I've played both and higher, don't see how that's relevant since it's just a simple math problem? Also not sure why you think getting 4x the number of hands per hour isn't relevant. All that matters is hands per hour and winrate. We know roughly what hands per hour there is at each game. The only other thing you need to decide is what winrates you think are plausible for both games. What long term winrates do you think are achievable for a player in both games? I agree with you that if you can find all pretty good 500nl games the hourly is prob higher, but you are claiming that it's not even close, which is likely inaccurate. 500nl in good games very likely better but it's definitely decently close hourly wise.


You’re right it comes down to winrates. Bottom line is I think winrates can be much much higher at reg tables than on zone over large samples. It does matter if you’ve played the games for this reason. I’m not going to go into detail of what I know about achievable winrates for Ignition in a public forum.

Oh and again, what I said ‘wasn’t even close’ was comparing playing 200z to playing 500nl. 2 tables of 200z vs 4 tabling 500nl isn’t a close comparison for hourly’s that hero could achieve.
02-23-2018 , 04:37 AM
Quote:
Originally Posted by Pots-For-Sale
You’re right it comes down to winrates. Bottom line is I think winrates can be much much higher at reg tables than on zone over large samples. It does matter if you’ve played the games for this reason. I’m not going to go into detail of what I know about achievable winrates for Ignition in a public forum.

Oh and again, what I said ‘wasn’t even close’ was comparing playing 200z to playing 500nl. 2 tables of 200z vs 4 tabling 500nl isn’t a close comparison for hourly’s that hero could achieve.
I believe we were comparing it on a table to table comparison, not a 2 zone vs 4 reg, but 1 zone : 1 reg
02-23-2018 , 06:45 AM
Just caught up on the thread. Congratulations on leaving work, enjoy the freedom! Also HUGE congrats on the engagement.

Will obv be reading intermittently!

Gl mate
02-23-2018 , 08:05 AM
Quote:
Originally Posted by Brokenstars
I've paid almost exactly (40c off) $13k in ~90k hands @ 200z

This is a bit over -7bb/100 rake


For my 200reg sample its 7.8, but looser play and more short handed makes that number make sense.


Ty. Decent improvement from the >10 I'm paying at 50, though I'm sure the jump in avg skill level is significant.
02-23-2018 , 12:19 PM
Some pretty silly arguments.

1. 200z or 200r is not the max stakes you can play while in the US.

2. If you're good enough to beat 400+ then you should be playing 400+ and not grinding 200

3. You should not be limiting yourself to only ignition games

4. Hands per hour and WR is not the most important thing when grinding 200z

5. Improving your poker game to beat 400+ and get yourself out of the rake trap for a higher hourly is the most important thing
02-23-2018 , 12:23 PM
. “Improving your poker game to beat 400+ and get yourself out of the rake trap for a higher hourly is the most important thing”

I agree.

Brokenstars have you identified the opponents that frequent 400?
02-23-2018 , 02:51 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by Brokenstars
I've paid almost exactly (40c off) $13k in ~90k hands @ 200z

This is a bit over -7bb/100 rake


For my 200reg sample its 7.8, but looser play and more short handed makes that number make sense.
I have 7396 hands of 200z in my database and i've paid $977 in rake. I'm also only getting 348 hands an hour. I would do anything for 3 tables of 200z and a timebank.
02-23-2018 , 07:59 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by Bob148
. “Improving your poker game to beat 400+ and get yourself out of the rake trap for a higher hourly is the most important thing”

I agree.

Brokenstars have you identified the opponents that frequent 400?
Not sure I understand the question but 400nl doesn't run anymore on ign. They removed 400 and 600 and replaced with 500nl
02-23-2018 , 08:51 PM
I'm going to start streaming 200z on ignition at 8pm CST at (approx 1 hour from this post)

https://www.twitch.tv/brokenstars666
02-23-2018 , 09:29 PM
might be like 8:10pm or something, don't worry though we will be on shortly!
02-23-2018 , 10:15 PM
stream up in a few mins
02-24-2018 , 12:58 AM
lost about $180 on the stream over 2 hrs. Ran atrocious so pretty good result imo.
02-24-2018 , 01:50 AM
Quote:
Originally Posted by andees10
Ty. Decent improvement from the >10 I'm paying at 50, though I'm sure the jump in avg skill level is significant.
Im paying 7.66bb at 50z.
02-24-2018 , 05:25 PM
I meant to ask if you've scouted the next stake at all.
02-24-2018 , 05:35 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by Bob148
I meant to ask if you've scouted the next stake at all.
I played a few thousand hands between 400nl - 1knl, but not really any since they changed the stakes
02-24-2018 , 05:51 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by mirage01
Im paying 7.66bb at 50z.
50Z LOL
I thought Australia was a 1st world country? You still living with mommy?

Last edited by barney big nuts; 02-24-2018 at 06:00 PM.
02-25-2018 , 01:27 AM
Quote:
Originally Posted by barney big nuts
50Z LOL
I thought Australia was a 1st world country? You still living with mommy?
Maybe I should just lie and pretend I grind 200 zone like you do, mr no nuts. lolz.
02-25-2018 , 08:35 AM
Quote:
Originally Posted by mirage01
Im paying 7.66bb at 50z.


Weird. I'm using the rake attributed stat in pt4 and I know there's a few other rake stats so maybe I'm calculating it wrong.
02-25-2018 , 09:11 AM
Quote:
Originally Posted by andees10
Weird. I'm using the rake attributed stat in pt4 and I know there's a few other rake stats so maybe I'm calculating it wrong.
mirage is either a massive massive nit or did the calcs wrong.

50z should be >7.66bb/100 rake
02-25-2018 , 11:37 AM
As you know, I am a massive nit. I'm paying 7.1bb/100 in rake @ $50nl.
02-25-2018 , 07:21 PM
Yes I am a nit. What's wrong with that in a high rake pool though? Looks like im saving a lot in rake.
02-25-2018 , 11:41 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by mirage01
Yes I am a nit. What's wrong with that in a high rake pool though? Looks like im saving a lot in rake.

It isn't necessarily a good thing if you're passing up on ev. Never play a hand and pay 0 rake....with a -25bb loss rate.

      
m