welp. gg. You can see the 3 biggest pots lost I think too there. Actually it's not showing my Q hi flush losing to K hi flush vs a 70/30 for 260 bb pot but w/e. Filter was slightly off I see.

Made 2 or 3 obvious mistakes - to be honest the last 2 weeks my volume was **** and my sharpness slipped a bit.

Quick example: I 3bet AKs and flop nut flush on Qc7c6c - one fish cold called the 3bet and another fish that opened completed.

so 3 way pot 3bet pot and I flopped nut flush

I cb 1/3 pot and cold caller fish raises me 3x, original opener fish folds and I jam lol

I jammed. Yeah. Well that was ******ed. Immediately after the hand I knew it was ******ed and almost always I would just flat there probably donk turn + jam riv instead of x'ing turn. Fish can have random AF 55 w/club just ****in around or 89s or even more extreme random stuff so calling is obviously better. It was in my 6th hour of 12 tabling so I'll just use that as my excuse.

I should max my sessions to 4 hours for sure. 2x4 is 8 hours on weekdays and 3x4 is 12 hours on weekends. Should flow better that way.

So that's 11,000 hands in the last 30 hours. Good start.

7 hours on weekdays and 10 hours on weekends at 730 hands/hour would actually meet the 500k hand quota. Would also give me a bit more time to study as well so I can be fresh each session coming out of study time. I think that would be optimal.

There is really no excuse to be making **** decisions like the example I listed above.

So balancing a bit of study time, balancing slightly shorter grind sessions imo is more optimal for this goal.

Peace out bitches and remember...

LET'S ****ING GO

I've been maxing my sessions at 3.5 hours and it's been a great change. I think even if you play 4 hours, close everything out, grab a bite to eat, move around a bit, and start a new session 15 minutes after ending the last one, you'll be much sharper than if you had just grinded 8 hours straight.

This girl is like the perfect template. She is honest (says she doesn't speak English well) and yet she's enthusiastic about giving it her best effort.

dude you need to step up that game in the event you ever meet a girl that can understand you

Anytime you have to double message you have already lost

yes because it wasn't the glitch that it was and I actually wrote the exact same words exactly 1 hour later between 5:50 am and 6:50 am lol

thinking is hard

I guess reading your own texts is hard. You did it in several spots. If they don't respond to the first message you did something wrong. Continuing to hound them just makes you look weak and pushes them away. Gl tho, seems like your badger until they respond game is strong.

Lmfao

"What is your work"

"sleep. bedtime."

"What is your work"

"Didn't do."

"Are you massage girl or student"

"Work"

"What is your work"

"No "


Yes, I totally screwed up the conversation and badgered her

Another dumbass blocked lmfao.

There are a lot of fake accounts, lady boys, massage girls and freelancers on Tinder here. If I suspect these based off the photos asking "What is your work" is in fact harassing her, yes - Trying to establish the absolute minimum of English capability by asking the most simple question "What is your work" and receiving 3 incoherent responses is in fact harassing her, yes - logic over 9,000.

Lol

p noob, while there assuredly are a lot of pros on tinder, i can assure you that it's not going to end well with those that aren't if your first question off the bat is asking whether or not they are a whore

you gotta stop thinking like you're running a database filter and think how the non whore will respond if you ask her if she's a whore - there's a person on the other side of that and they'll end up putting your cock in their mouths a lot more frequently it you don't treat it like a hand history review

a secret hooker won't make much money, if she's a pro she'll reveal it soon enough on her own

It is like 2 primitive chat bots learning to speak. wtf am i reading?

You're reading a masterclass in how to slay Thai bitches, duh.

Cringe at the 555 over usage.

OP confirmed slangin with the powerful tinder game. 555

I know what u mean bro dis ***** makin me cringe hard wit all her 555's n sh** christ wish she would stfu

Turn-ons include animal cruelty, laminating, scamming backers and an ability to subsist on a concentration camp style diet.

Bro you gotta cease and desist I'm trying to grind right now and I need that hand to click not for the things you makin me think about

Damn OP, I'd feel bad for you if you weren't so insanely negative all the time.

It is too bad your phone has this double/triple/quad texting glitch while talking to a "***** you wish would stfu". Maybe she'd stop sending all those cumbersome 1-3 word responses if your phone wasn't sending so glitch many messages. Might be upgrade time.

555

Noob, what are you strongest at, playing poker or texting thai lady?

This line of reasoning has been questioned before in this thread. I would think your 200k hand BE stretch with a 50BI downer at the end would have cemented the fact that this type of goal setting/budgeting is flawed.

I think any of these types of monetary or winrate goals aren't really that productive. It's much more effective to focus on your volume and mindset.

Is your backer/former coach still providing coaching? It seems like you were having your best results when you were under him.

16,000 hands in 2 days. Grinded all through the night, 8 am now. +$274 overall, excluding rakeback. Made some obvious mistakes which really should never have happened but will provide about 1 hour each day to run some questionable hands through a solver. Top 5 biggest pots lost all coolers which is good to see.



Gotta exercise now. My apartment building is 6 stories and every half story will do 1 pushup (only going up though - kind of like 1 pussy af ****** burpee sort of thang) so 36 pushups per day with 18 flights walked.

Every week for the next 3 months will add one extra 6 story walk so after 12 weeks should be like 18 sets of 6 floors walked. 108 pushups per day at the end? That should help me lose a bit of weight to prepare for my beach villa

LET'S ****ING GO

Subbed, GLGL

50/50 split just for staking seemed a bit steep so I recently convinced him that I can send 1 HH every day and have a quick 3 minute chat about it. I mean hey after 3 months that's 90 hh's reviewed

I told him it's in his best interest because 3 minutes a day should increase my winrate to a degree that makes the profit splits better in his favor long term. And that's actually a true statement so he has no choice but to accept it lol

Some people still think the earth is flat and some people think not hitting your life goals is bad for you and so they claim you shouldn't even make any at all.

Did a series of 3.5 hour sessions this weekend - usually takes like 30 minutes for every wait list to get me at a table so it's more like 3 hours of actual intense poker. Felt so perfect.

I know these things already but if I have a nice winning day or even worse...consecutive winning days - I start to slip up in my daily routine and volume/table # self imposed restrictions and then I get punished

So it's always a cat and mouse inner psychological game I play with myself of moving myself back to what I know is the most rational parameters for long term success. But eventually I start to slip again...never ending process lol

seems like in year 2020 everyone is making terrible choices lol - enjoy

Every mental game coach would agree with this, as monetary goals are impossible to control (OP's "breakeven stretch" is a good example of that) and setting volume or study goals is the way to go, but im sure OP knows better like he always does, that's why he's living the dream life on a 18k baht monthly budget.

Daily HH analysis 1 of 90

1.) I assume regs defend wider when super deep so if you imagine their entire range on an A43r flop I feel like they miss this board so damn much - and x'ing range vs better regs is best. If not then b.x.b line should work nicely.

2.) Solver suggests that IP villain might want to fold TT/JJ even vs 1/3 cbets (depends on how tight my 3bet range is of course but it's not that wide vs CO) - so ott we still want to make them cry call with things like TT/JJ - they shouldn't have that many back door flush draws so we are targetting Ax which is never folding and underpairs which will call more often vs a slightly smaller size than the 3/4 I used here. 1/2 pot probably better.

I think x'ing turn is an option as well using a b.x.b line - If the Q is blocking bdfd's I'd prefer to just do bet-bet

3.) Villain shouldn't have too many riv bluffs vs our x's but they should still have some - 65s/76s/75s at some frequency and then maybe some KQs/KJs/KTs - and less frequently they might bluff something like 88/99 (if we bet turn smaller) - their calling range would be pretty much non existent - I think AQ is better to x than something like AK - as AQ blocks their most logical QQ potential riv calls where as AK unblocks QQ. So value betting AK and x'ing almost all other Ax seems the most ratinoal

4.) My riv jam seems pretty ******ed as I have received multiple agreement on this feeling - it would be disgusting if they have quads and even **** regs aren't going to bet-call worse. So I was being irrationally over-optimistic for sure.

5.) As a maximum exploit vs weak regs I think cbetting range but x'ing top of range is best - they can't defend on this texture so we can cbet pretty aggressively our weaker range and by x'ing strongest range we can extract more value from 66-JJ, and random sc's like Ts8s that want to bluff

6.) I should 3bet bigger pre flop, I tend to 3bet smaller when much deeper as some sort of risk-control but it's probably not optimal especially when my 3bet ranges aren't really that wide