Quote:
Originally Posted by BitchiBee
I don't understand why playing correctly differs from live to online.
I don't understand what you are saying. They are two different games and optimal lines in one are not necessarily optimal lines in the other.
Quote:
Originally Posted by BitchiBee
reads have to be very very strong to differ from playing the top/bottom of our ranges differently. If you are saying we can't have a bluffing range on this river due to image and him being bad, I just can't go with that we have a very thin bluffing % on this river anyways so he loses way too much if he bluff catches all made hands.
Whether villain loses too much by calling this river is irrelevant to the decision at hand. If as an example Villain calls this river with all made hands that makes villain super exploitable. We exploit him by value betting him wider, and we should also be bluffing him less often.
Ko$herMoney! sarcastically asked this:
Quote:
Originally Posted by Ko$herMoney!
so the correct way is to completely disregard your opponents range bc OPs exact holding is 7 high?
And you replied:
Quote:
Originally Posted by BitchiBee
yes, when you have nut bottom of your range you bluff most of the time regardless of w/e villain holds.
Which is a ridiculous response. We should of course be considering villain's calling range on this river and whether it makes mathematical sense to bluff. To do otherwise is just clicking buttons.
Quote:
Originally Posted by BitchiBee
And c/r would be terrible we have reverse blockers
This game would be a lot easier if we could make our decisions simply based on blockers.