Quote:
Originally Posted by Kodiak5500
I have been playing online poker for about 2 years on and off. I decided I really want to make a run at it and see what I can do. My final goal is to be pro, by that I mean I want to pay my bills by playing poker.
Why?
-I feel like I have a great opportunity to take a chance. I am 20, single have money saved up. I have no kids, no bills (except the basics, phone, insurance ect.) I am in a situation were i am living rent free for hopefully till the end of the summer. I want to use this time to get a good roll started for NL200.
How?
-I have no job (quit to make a run at poker ), I basically have 16 hours a day to play. I plan to log at least 60hours a week. I have choose PokerStars to play on, for the VIP program and I an currently 1400 VPP's from platinum star.
My plan..
-I wrote up a lose 37 week plan to make 40k (I did this before I read about the guy on the prop bet to make 40k in 365 days lol, very cool though) This plan is my dream plan. It has limits, and a weekly goal. I have also wrote up 8 week plans that are more reasonable to achieve.
Progress so far...
-I started with $200 and 16-20 tabled NL10. I had also started to clear the $285 bonus for GoldStars. Below is my graph after the first week. My 37 week goal for week 1 was $300, and i made that. My 8 week goal was $225 and i obviously made that.
I am having issues getting use to NL25 as people are playing back against my 3bets, and floating my c-bets. (ya ya i know welcome to poker right? lol) I got beat up cause i didn't adjust then made a come back as you can see the variance at the end of the graph.
Ask me any questions and wish me luck 2p2.
Currently I have $750 and want to get to $1500-2000 before I start NL50.
Any tips for NL25?
Congratulations on taking these steps to achieve your dream job so to say. You can certainly make $40k in a year as arcticbeatle is attempting and I am currently doing so with much better success than arctic. You seem to be a consistent winner at 10NL. As you move up you are right you'll see a little more tougher play. I've played up to 1000NL and honestly even up to that stake theres not much any difference. It all plays the same. Raise p/f in position (steal the blinds), make your c/bet and people for the most part respect your plays rather than play back at you cause the players that do play back at you they either have huge wins, or huge losses (its a volatile play). So play tight and take advantage of players that play back by waiting for a strong hand. Dont have your stack all-in unless having next to nuts and never presume somebody is bluffing. Playing higher stakes would improve your game cause at the lower stakes of 25 or 50NL you run into more goofballs so it may affect your decisions at these stakes. I was mentoring a micro stake player and he was making wrong decisions for the sheer fact that "these are 10NL players". Play each table no matter what the stake to the best of your ability. There should come a point in your career where it doesnt matter how high the stakes you play as you know you're a good player and can handle any situation. I find higher stakes more easier cause you dont run into K-4's too often although I have at 1000NL. And so the point is even at the much higher stakes you'll have somebody at the table who is new (not a reg), some players will be very short stack, some players play tight, some players play aggressive, some players limp, some raise, and most all of them play pre flop position. So its the same set up at every stake you play. Theres nothing special, or frightening about playing a higher stake. You'll see more playback from the blinds (if you raise in late position), or from late position (if you raise in early-mid position). If somebody is playing back at you its best for you to give them the pot before getting involved while they are representing the best hand unless you have a pocket pair or A-K, fold everything else. But its really about being patient and waiting for the right oppurtunity and understanding how the players at your table play. Although thats much harder to do when multi tabling. I've 16-tabled as well, playing 50k hands at each of the micro stake levels. Some advice I can give you is to put in 50k or more hands at each level before moving up to the next. You may have a large win streak at 10NL but a losing streak may be right around the corner and you dont want that to happen when you move up to 25NL. Its what arcticbeatle did and I warned him ahead of time. I told him to put in 50k hands at each level before moving up. What he did was move up to the next level after reaching a certain bankroll so he had only played 5k hands and made out big but eventually had his losing streak at 25NL. And since then he hasnt been playing much and is seeking a coach. I also want to mention you may run into a 25k hand streak of breaking even. Those would happen, and you may also have up to a 10 buy-in downswing. Just continue playing cause these things happen and is the norm after playing so much. If you're playing 16 tables and have a lot of time put in 50k hands at each level first. Even going from 40k to 50k hands, your bb/100 fluctuates a lot so 100k hands (may take 4 weeks if you put in 5k hands a day playing 5 days a week) is preferred as it would be more accurate. After you've put in 50k hands at each level you'll have a clearer picture of your winnings in terms of bb/100. You can make $40k by end of the year by being 1.3bb/100 winner at 100NL + Rakeback putting in 25k hands a week. You'd know if youd be able to achieve that by the stats you put up at the lower levels which should have a higher bb/100. So you have to build a track and stay on it to reach your goal of $40k.
I just noticed you did put in 50k hands here at 10NL and put up 3.77bb/100. Good job. I've been there and have done the same. My graphs are similar to yours having a steady trend though some graphs you'll have that 25k hand break even stretch which if you havent ran into yet, be ready for one =/. Not all your graphs are going to look like that after 50k hands I want to tell you. But a 3.77bb/100 perofrmance at 10NL I'm sure you can easily do 1bb/100 at 200NL which would be on track of reaching your goal =). Higher stake players make stronger laydowns so the guys at 10NL who call your all-ins with a straight when you have a flush, that wont happen as often as you move up in stakes and thats the difference in recorded winnings. The same is true if you're playing 10NL and have pocket Aces you'll get all-in called by pocket Queens but the higher you move up, those players will fold the Queens. So your 3.77 bb/100 will get smaller as you move up. Other than that, I think 2NL players play the same as 200NL for the most part (they all play the best they can), but what makes 2NL more profitable is because of a larger volume of "fish", or players who dont play very well / recklessly. Either way as you move up in stakes, the play will be very similar except there will be fewer reckless players who would make bad calls. Just stick with your A game and dont fear anything about 25NL as if its a challenge cause you can play and beat any sizeable table. When you move up from smaller stakes it seems that way and you'll hear a lot of talk about 25NL and 100NL being "tough stuff" ... its not. Continue playing, critiquing, and learning and no xNL would be tough for ya.