Quote:
Originally Posted by XXIV
A9o everything got there OTT, I think you have better bluffing candidates than A high.
65s, I'm very weary of minclicks on these boards, you can't really fold but I don't think I'll be the one piling the money in.
75o, I'm at a lost here, I'd like to hear your thought process on the turn and river for why you did this play.
T9o bet turn bigger.
85o, I'll be considering folding the river against tight opponents. As played, it looks like a tilt play for some reason.
K8o, no one bluffs that way on a 3 to a flush board in my experience.
J2s, awful check-raise.
A8d, river sizing off for many purposes.
J9d probably a flip at best if you stack off on that board, unless you're playing vs a huge whale.
K9o, you can call vs an aggro, but I'd tend to fold vs unknown.
Anyway, cool thread, keep it up. Not much hyper or spin content in the challenges forum.
65s - Agree. It's not very likely, that they play 2p this way. Not even TP+FD. There's still some randomness factor, but I don't think that it's high enough. So yeah, probably just flat the flop.
75o - Majority of check back range is going to be Ax, Kx. And I expect to see a lot of calls ott. Therefore I have to bet again. Thing is, that from my experience double paired boards get hero called way too often. Even vs a pot sized bet. So I figured - let's rip it in.
Well, maybe there was a mistake on the turn. I am not sure. As I experiment with probing super wide (yeah, people check back overs, but also a plenty of air, and then some value and some draws, too). Air folds to one street aggression.
It might be a spew anyway. Let's see how this experiment with probing air goes.
T9o - I was using a plenty of sizings when I was probing the turn. Starting with 50 %, then 75 %, and even 100 %+ on certain boards. I simplified that to 50 %. But I might be losing some value this way. So yeah, I should have at least two sizings. Betting bigger makes sense here. And I should just overfold otr. Not sure here, but in general. I have to keep it in my mind. Because river calls are costing me a lot of money.
85o - Small sizing usually indicates a weak hand. But in this scenario, I might have forgot, that villain lead on three streets on quite a wet board. So yeah, I am not considering calling here almost ever. Either raise, or fold.
So yeah, I agree, that folding is better here. And I manipulate with river raise sizing a lot. If I want to get called, I make it smaller. If I want to get a fold, I just make it bigger like here.
Anyway, I might be leaking money with this line. I am not sure. I should check in my DB and see how I am doing. One thing is certain, it increases variance a lot. Because some people like to station very wide.
K8o - Yeah. Another spot, where I should just snap fold the river.
And it's quite interesting what you said. Maybe we can use this information vs thinking opponents and bluff at certain frequency with good hands.
J2s - This might be a tilt play
Because when somebody is very aggro against me, I want to play back at him. And if I am card dead, I am looking for marginal spots, where I can outplay the player. But yeah, this is just a disaster. Board selection, hand selection, everything is wrong.
A8s - Why is that? I don't understand the theory very well (yet).
J9s - I am very passive OOP in limped pots. So I figured I need to up the aggression. But yeah, I have better hands to do it with. C/c should be better.
K9o - Agree 100 %.
Thank you for the comments and GL!
Quote:
Originally Posted by SimpleRick
In my opinion I think you would be better off transitioning to cash games. Learn to play 6max or full ring, I think there's more money to be made in that format. Or maybe even PLO. I just feel like spending a lot of time grinding and studying for HU SnGs is time that could be better spent elsewhere. Either way, good luck OP!
I agree 100 %. Thing is, that HU hypers are the only game that I am confident in. And maybe I am afraid to trainsit elsewhere. But I have to!
PLO seems like a good option, as the competition is probably not going to be as tough as in NLHE (or I might wrong on this one). I played some already and I am totally clueless about ranges (especially preflop). And then totally lost in 3b pots and so on. So yeah, I might give it a shot.
Have you got any recommendations for the start? Preflop charts, basic game plan and so on?
Thank you and GL to you, too!
################################################
Update for 11th January
Played: 9.35 h (24.03/100)
Studied: 0.5 h (3/30)
Exercise:
Results:
Update for 12th January
Played: 3.37 h (27.4/100)
Studied: 0.5 h (3.5/30)
Exercise:
- 14.5 km of cross country skiing (440 m ascent)
Results:
I didn't update yesterday, as I was completely dead after exercise. Majority of yesterday's volume was played before doing sports. Afterwards I felt completely exhausted and I played just a little bit and then I watched PokerStars stream - there was a final table of 530 Blowout. Cool stuff, I definitely need to improve my MTT skill, too.
Thing is, that I want to be good at everything, which means, that I will be just average in every area. So I should go one after the other.
Oh and I am quite obsessed with my redline. Thing is, that it's also villain dependent. And card distribution makes a big difference, too.
I mean, vs a passive villain my graph will look different, than vs a maniac.
It also depends if I get the chance to value bet thin. Or if I go bet, bet, shove with my top range. Or if I bet, bet, bet smaller with good hands on certain runouts. Lots of factors. But to be honest, I should just care about making the best decisions.
Because I might have done stupid things, just to push that red line a little higher. Thing is, that people are incapable of folding in certain spots. So yeah, I have to try a different approach. And stop being an aggro monkey vs the wrong opponents on wrong textures (like the hands that I posted recently... yeah, but there was one spew after another... so I have to pick spots carefully and hands, too)