Low Bankroll, no time for long sessions and a bit of botmode shoving will be part of this I guess.
I am starting with 1.5$ and I don't think I will make it that far but let's see.
Threadsavers and graphs coming up. Holla.
History: started online poker in 2006, lost 20€, did not grind anything in the golden days and started out in 2010.
Lost 1k€ and started winning.
Own BR Lifetime winnings ~25k$
BR to date: 157$
Goal for 2016: Don't go broke
Challenge for 2016: Profit preRB
---
2016 so far, started on January,11th
Started with an upswing of course, C net adjusted is at 26$. Let's see..
Thread for savers.
Spoiler:
Let'sa rolla
Last edited by Uhrenknecht; 01-12-2016 at 11:22 PM.
IIRC Psyduck acbarone decided to move to spins because on his main game 9s there was not enough traffic.
Hypers traffic is always higher than turbo traffic, so 9s turbos ain't an option. Poker won't be dead, no worries.
6max turbos if you do not want to experience the hyper variance. Otherwise MTTSnGs or MTTs is the way to go.
not broke yet, was not playing A-game .. forum watching, nail biting, being tired and not even thinking about certain ICM spots or enemies ranges. Called 3bets vs KK/QQ and donked off with top pair vs set etc. anyway, variance.
Imho, limp is fine pre, but don't get involved post flop at all if you miss. At those levels, villains never fold so you should exploit your best against them!
Raising >>> Limping IMO. Isolate the weak limper, c-bet, profit.
And on a more general note, I think looking at BBs won is a rather weird/suboptimal way to track results/improvement as there are several instances where +cEV spots are massively -EV due to ICM. If you're insistent on using BBs, I'd only look at spots that occur before 5-handed play.
but I guess realizing my overcard/flushdraw equity with backup of fold equity is better than c/f or c/c. Right vs his hand I had 34% on the turn so paying 18 BB to win additional 36 BB is completely break even. If he folds some times, it gets +EV.
regarding BB/100 in 6-9handed spots: 703 BB adjusted in 386 games with 1075 BB recorded. time for a downswing to settle the luck.
Do you want trhreadsave your changes?
Spoiler:
Last edited by Uhrenknecht; 01-27-2016 at 04:10 PM.
here i think overlimping with AXs hands is ok but with KXs you leave a lot of value / calling for trouble, its either villains going to call the iso way too light or gonna fold far too much (cos of very wide limping ranges), also we _must_ iso to preventing the hand developing into these flop scenarios, on flop i think its a std. c/f as we draw against the whole deck 5way, turn shove i think also screams air (to me it seems for none of the hands we try to rep would be logical to jam turn)
What about the flop call? Calling more than a pot sized bet on 654r with only King high/a backdoor flush draw is meh at best and becomes a lot worse when we factor in stack sizes and relative position.
Quote:
Originally Posted by Uhrenknecht
but I guess realizing my overcard/flushdraw equity with backup of fold equity is better than c/f or c/c. Right vs his hand I had 34% on the turn so paying 18 BB to win additional 36 BB is completely break even. If he folds some times, it gets +EV.
But villain doesn't always have A6o, he can certainly have stronger hands that you'll have less equity against. Plus there's the whole +cEV doesn't always equal +EV argument.
Calling more than a pot sized bet on 654r with only King high/a backdoor flush draw is meh at best and becomes a lot worse when we factor in stack sizes and relative position.
I don't recall the hand, but I guess since we were HU otf after he makes a possible steal maybe I wasn't convinced of his strength/ thought I had FE. Flushdraw on the turn with an overcard, at least some EQ gain.
Quote:
Originally Posted by acbarone
But villain doesn't always have A6o, he can certainly have stronger hands that you'll have less equity against. Plus there's the whole +cEV doesn't always equal +EV argument.
77-33,A7s-A3s,K7s-K4s,75s+,64s+,53s+,43s,A7o-A3o,K7o,87o,76o I have 24% EQ against.
Is my calc right the we lose 5BB if that's his range? If he folds 27% it gets break even.
Also it happened 9 handed and I was first in. Low bubble factor and a bit of FE, no?
I don't recall the hand, but I guess since we were HU otf after he makes a possible steal maybe I wasn't convinced of his strength/ thought I had FE. Flushdraw on the turn with an overcard, at least some EQ gain.
You're confusing flop play with turn play.
On the turn, I don't doubt a shove has some fold equity and our hand has actual, real equity. But on the flop, we called a bet with an extremely weak hand on a very wet board. A large bet. Out of position. With no real plan for the rest of the hand.
My guess is we're check-folding turn to every non K/J and open shoving every heart, which is going to make it very unprofitable in the long term. You binked one of your "outs" and then managed to get it in with breakeven EV in a game where the field is likely incredibly soft. Not the best outcome IMO.
You're also not HU otf, you're five handed; you overlimped, button limped behind, SB completed, BB checked. I guess you get HU after everyone checks to button, he bets, everyone folds to you...
Still, a guy overbet pot on 654r 5-handed -- I'd expect that sizing and the fact that he bet into multiple players to be evidence of strength, but you think he's stealing/weak based on pretty much nothing.
On the flop I don't believe he has it 100% of the time. On the turn we gain EQ. If I think that I have FE on the flop, then I can also have FE on the turn. Maybe it's a level that I like to shove "too late"
Quote:
With no real plan for the rest of the hand.
Given that his bet sizing enables a 1:1 SPR HU, I am happy to call and openshove. The Qh makes it only better because we get a scarecard + flushdraw
Quote:
I guess you get HU after everyone checks to button, he bets, everyone folds to you...
that's what I meant.
Quote:
based on pretty much nothing.
Yeah, somebody I have zero hands on bets pot at the 1.5$ .
That's such a huge range. In the end it was just donking around.