Hand 2 - Ranges Vs Lines
The biggest jump in my poker skill was when I started focusing on ranges rather than just lines.
Thinking on lines is stuff like aforementioned beluga theorem "re-evaluate one pair hands when raised OTT"... it is not necessarily wrong, and such advice (like beluga's) can be broadly accurate and even applicable.
However, line-thinking is incomplete - we need to be more specific to gain a huge edge and develop a game that conforms to each Villain's specific mistakes.
Ranging is both an offensive and defensive tool. It can guide you to successful bluffs AND help you pick off bad bluffs from your opponents. Below is a hand where when it is my action on the river... the villain literally has
ZERO combinations in his range. This is almost always the trademark of a bluff... and specifically, a hand where the villains reversed their plan mid-hand. AND... the opponent usually expects a successful bluff because they think their LINE looks strong, but they fail to consider ranges.
Villain is a middle aged asian, long time reg, with a reputation for being loose.
At this point it is late in the night and I have built up a $2300 stack at the 2/5 main game. At this table, my image is a little better - I have played a little tighter and mostly been betting in value spots.
Previous hand of note:
$10 straddle in LP,
BB calls for $10,
Villain is to my immediate right. He has ~$850 and I cover.
Villain makes it $40 from MP,
I make it $110 with AK
Folds around to Villain who calls.
In all honesty, his range is pretty wide at this point although it is heavily weighted towards 2 broadways, medium PPs (77-JJ), and maybe suited connectors...
Pot is $240, Flop
773
V checks,
I bet $130
V calls
Off chance he has a 7, but most likely he has a pair here. I am certainly going to try to convince him I have KK/AA and get a fold here (with a backup plan of spiking a K or A).. I will be happy to see any J/Q/K/A OTT though to help my bluff.
Turn, Pot is $500
7735
..pretty much a blank, but I go ahead
V checks,
I bet $250 (V doesn't really track pot size, so this should be thought of as a huge bet.. it also commits him)
.. He calls
Time for backup plan, give me a river!!!
Turn, Pot is $1000
77355
V checks... I am never pushing him out here for the few hundred he has left, I check behind, he shows 88 and I muck.
As much as this seems like a series of great calls by villain, after studying him longer, I realize he is calling simply because his 8s are an overpair to the board. My range would be QQ-AA (18) and sometimes AK (16, but discounted). He is not ranging! He was ready to follow up a $40 bet by check-calling for $810 more with 88. This is a great guy to have to my right as long as I stop trying to convince him I have XX, and instead really have XX.
So hand 2 now. Maybe 45 minutes later. Villain is what I will call level 1.5 - his cards + consideration for generic "lines".. not level 2 where he considers my specific range.
Villain has ~$1200 in play and I cover.
Hero is dealt 9
9
One EP limp,
Villain limps in MP,
I make it $35 from HJ
BTN calls,
blinds fold,
EP calls,
Villain calls
Villain's range is very wide for limp-calling. He limps a lot and rarely limp-folds, but TT+ is out because he limped to start. BTN calls behind me everytime I raise it seems like, so his range is every speculative hand. EP is ABC post-flop. This should be an easy hand with a favorable flop and assuming BTN doesn't hit and get in behind me.
Flop is (pot: $145)
7
3
2
Checks to me,
I bet $90,
BTN folds,
EP folds,
Villain calls
I feel his range is 45, maybe some A4s/A5s with backdoor potential, maybe 7x one gappers, 97/87/76/75, and 77-22, discounted 99-88. I crush this range pretty well.
Turn (pot $325)
7
3
2
T
This is a really good card for me. It improves nothing in his range, and it doesn't really scare him either.
He checks, I bet $90 again
.. I'll explain. I am avoiding commitment to this hand somewhat, but I also am trying to keep his range very wide. His range in general has ~5 outs on average... so I can lay some longer odds to him. I will return to a bigger bet on the river when I can be sure he does not have any sets (if call-check river by V). Much bigger of a bet, and I will only get to continue with the top of his range (sets), and likely check-raised and knocked off my hand.
So the river (pot is $505):
7
3
2
T
T
Perfection!!
Villain leads out $250
And here is the lesson. He wants to rep a T... but there is nothing left in his range. How could he limp-call,check-call a 7 3 2 rainbow flop with a naked Ten? (Tx as 2 pair certainly raises turn this deep). Perhaps a slow played set turned FH... but honestly, that set did not suddenly get better with a paired river, thus justifying a huge leap in aggression. Any set was pretty much the nuts all along... He is playing a line, not a range. He knows "runner runner pair is scary". He got here with a bluff catcher, realized I don't triple barrel (remember I did double barrel AK before), and decided, just for good measure to make sure he wins - he has turned a bluff catcher into a bluff... a big one at that. Seriously, make a case that he could have a Ten / a FH / or JJ+? He has nothing left for combinations... ZERO hands... it is a bluff-catch turned bluff line.
I call,
He show 53o...
I pull in a $1k pot thanks to ranging... failure to range by V, good ranging by me
Last edited by bip!; 06-23-2013 at 10:47 PM.