Quote:
Originally Posted by pure_aggression
100% agree with your perspective, I think it's bad to have a possessive and jealous mentality when dating. Polyamory seems the best approach to dating as long as all parties are responsible and everyone is using protection.
I'm not sure if that lifestyle is totally practical for people in the phase of life of raising offspring.
Yo!
Amen.
Quote:
Originally Posted by dwyt84
sup tyler its been awhile. you coming over to the philippines again? im playing PLO now. maybe we can talk when you drop by and visit
Probably not Philippines bound anytime soon.. Hope all is well and the money printing machine is working well!
Quote:
Originally Posted by cafepoker
I am not a true bleiever in "true love". I think men and women are compatable with one another to the point where they want to share thier life together, but theres nothing else holding them together. Same reason why I am very skeptical of religion, magic, higher power etc. That is why i view marriage as not a symbol of love but a signed document saying they are both dedicated to being together, no cheating etc. I view the opposite sex mostly as a best friend that I can get preggo and carry on the circle of life. Whether or not I stick around for the baby doesnt matter. Like in the animal kingdom the parents sometimes take turns hunting for fish while the other stands guard the child (penguins). I would get pissed if while I was a penguin catching dinner I came back to see the mother of my child having sex with another penguin not looking after my kid whos cold!
Thats because that whore didnt make a good decision reguarding the child. Men also view women on a scale of how attraxtive they are in part by how healthy/ fertile they look to give birth and raise a child. That is why younger women are way more sought after 16 years old +, wheras mens age doesnt matter much and doesnt make them look much worse. Girls do not appear to age as gracefully as men as a result. That is because the man just plants his seed, and is expected to provide and defend, and generally the older a man is the more weathly and wise. TLDR: LOL
It appears you have watched the national geographic documentary on penguins! It's quite a fun watch and exposes the unusual mating dynamics of penguins.
Sharing your life experiences with someone is a great reason to be together. Its one of the reasons I'm with my girlfriend. I rather experience life events with her than alone. That said, it isn't the only reason we are together. I think expressions of love are awesome and provide more +net postivie emotions than expressions of self-love. Something as simple as putting effort into making a delicious meal for someone you love.. Or crafting a simple gift. ****, even taking time to bring a woman to orgasm. I find expressions of love make me feel good(as the giver). It makes the other person feel good too. Net +emotion are the best. Plus, It tends to generate a natural cycle of giving/receiving love.
The key to this "cycle of love" is to give without expectation. I find that keeping conscious awareness of the balance of love expressions tends to destroy the cycle rather quickly. I think this is pretty typical of frugal-types(me included), and that its a pretty destructive habit for relationships. I believe It's only worth noticing if its way out of balance. Also, I think that the a major factor in the livelihood of the "cycle of love" is based on each parties relative desires/capacities to give and receive love. If one party slightly prefers receiving love than giving love, and another party strongly prefers receiving love its going to be a challenge to keep the cycle alive.
---
So, I played in the $5k in Sydney yesterday. I have to say that I am continuously impressed by the value of life MTTs. My table started off with 4-5 fish and 2 okay regs. This just seems incredible to me for a $5k MTT, but it doesn't seem to be unusual-- other tables in this MTT were of similar value and my experience in the aussie millions was similar.
I had a couple interesting decisions:
1. First level. I have an aggro image as I 3b 89o btn v co (blinds were dead seats), and got to showdown with 2p v T9o.
Villian(aggro fish) opens MP, hero calls CO A9o, BB(fish) calls
Flop ($950)
9d6s3c
bb check, villain check, hero bets $650
Yeah, I like this, I think against 2 fish I should bet larger with my value-- maybe even $750.
turn($2250)
4d
BB check, hero bets $1500, villain calls quickly.
I like this bet too, I think the sizing is good vs pair+fd, 9x, and maybe some 6x
river ($5250)
7x
villain looks at her chips and checks, hero ($9000 back) ?
Also, I dont put too much emphasis into live reads, but generally weaker players that visibly think about betting the river are very weak.
So, I think with my image and the info I had (live read + she looked like a fish-- but no showdowns yet) She has 98-k9 and maybe even some 6x that will call $2.4k more frequently than she has better that calls or bluff raises. She may even blocker bet some of her 2pair or lead some of her straights on the river, which makes her range even more 9x heavy. In game she had J6o and would have folded(probably?). Small mistake.
2.
200/400 (50), hero(17k) hasn't been that active lately and has a losing image.
Fish(35k) opens to 900 in MP, reg(40k) slow calls HJ+1, another reg(50k) fast calls HJ, hero is in the CO with KQo and pauses/tanks. Btn sometimes shows his action when I am tanking. In this hand he shows no indication of folding.
reads: HJ reg has cold 3b merged when deep with fish in the past. HJ+1 seems tricky and I think his tank call range is actually weaker than his snap call range.
Right, so I think this is actually quite a good spot to 3b/f as I think the regs are rarely trapping. I think she folds ~50%(and the regs will fold ~90%). Making it 4200 is close to chip+EV and also I think she will 4b QQ-AA/AK and may flat or fold TT-JJ/AQs instead of 4b, so I can sometimes win postflop, too. In game I decided to fold because the btn was nitty and probably only interested in the hand if he had 77+ KQs, AJo+.
In game I folded. The btn 3b to 4k and it got through.
3.
200/400(50) I have 14k, folds to me in the HJ, I open QJo to 900 folds to BB(fish) who snap 3b to 2300. Hero tank folds
This was a strange one, I think its probably a +chip EV call in position.. but I have a stack that I want to preserve, and villain wont fold much post.. so I was thinking I needed something highly +chip EV to justify calling on this stack. Also, this fish seemed happy to defend 80% of hands in all previous defend spots.. so I thought her 3b range was value heavy (like, QQ-AA/AK heavy with this sizing).
I tank cry folded and villain showed AA.
4.
I played a hand against a good reg. I believe hes a good player, and I think he thinks I'm a good player-- but I'm not sure.
blinds changed to 200/400(50)
Hero(15k) and there is a fish on the btn and sb, good reg in BB.
hero has ThTd and attempts to raise to 750(I thought it was the previous level), and makes it 800 instead. Folds to BB(15k) who asks how much I have and calls. (I think this weights his range to weak hands as he has a great 3b/f opportunity with stack sizes)
flop ($2000)
6h5d2h
villain check, hero bets $1000, villain calls
Yeah, I like this bet with most of my range.
Villain calls relatively quickly. I think he c/r all combo draws, 2pairs and NFDs, so his range is super 6x/5x heavy
turn ($4000)
Ac
Villain check, Hero bets 1800, villain calls.
I think this card absolutely smashes my range. Most of my bluffs on the flop just got there. I have 89s, T9s KQo and suited broadways which are like ~40 combos and have decent equity/playability against 6x/5x. That said, sets, 2p, and 77+ is like 120 combos. So, I think in theory, with 3:1 value:bluff and sizing ~1/3 on this turn makes the most sense against a good player. Perhaps ~2.5k is best as an exploit.. because he may perceive me as checking some 77-KK or a8s in this spot, and/or having more bluffs than I should(QTo/JTo).
He called, river was 3x and I checked back TT. I snap checked back TT, which maybe is a mistake. Perhaps betting 99+ on this river and no pair for ~half pot is best given how the 3x is a "scary" card for me, and given how wide his range could be with my small turn sizing.