If he's overfolding a lot sure, but K high textures oop like this in 3bp people defend relatively OK... you had another hand in your thread similar to this.

Better to choose larger sizing here still on turn. Textures with lower cards maybe you can cbet more often when x to for smaller sizings

Cool discussion, I guess it would have been nice on my part to mention the villain was a stationy rec Sorry for that.

---------------------------------------------------

Hate playing after a break. Even if it is only 2-3 days, my game seems to derietorate drastically - cant focus properly, my ingame analysis becomes very shallow and apparently my flipping skills go to ****.

Either way, pretty happy with how I played all things considered, solid B-game is all I could ask for.

Some random hands:

1) thats rather wide mate


2)


3) vs nitty fish


4) playing street poker with a whale


5) some respect please


6)


7)


8) not sure about this one vs good reg. Briefly checked it in PIO and it seems to play it the same, but didnt have time to nodelock properly


9) vs good reg


10) seems wide


11) getting owned by "bet everything everytime" reg


12) interesting one




Studied as much as I planned on Thursday, which Im really happy about. Today I marked 6 hands and plan to go through all of them after the gym. Hopefully I can study them in detail and not just look at what PIO spews out just to get it over with as fast as possible.

Number 1 study nemesis

for h10 I wonde if the 20% cbet is the sizing suggested by the solver?

This changes everything lol

Do you plan to move up to 500nl anytime soon?

You've already proven over a huge sample size that you're completely crushing 200nl. Surely you would be at least a small winner at 500nl too?

Didn't he just move up to $200z few months ago and only has around 250k hands? Wouldn't really consider that a "huge" sample. He is clearly doing good in the games but the jump/skill gap between 200z to 500z is probably lot bigger then you would expect.

The graph showns a 7bb/100 win rate over 300k hands. It also shows that he's up 210 buyins at 200nl, which is an insane amount. I consider that a huge sample.

From his profit alone, he's got almost 100 buyins at 500nl, and people usually start taking shots when they have as little as 20 buyins.

And having a 7bb/100 win rate would rate him as one of the top 200nl regs in the pool. Surely a top 2% reg at 200nl isn't going to be a loser at 500nl?

so true, guess Im not the only one guilty of it

most likely not

yup


300k hands isnt a huge sample in my eyes. Even tho its 8evbb/100, theres still a decent chance my true winrate is <5bb and as such I think Im better off sticking to 200z.

That said Im still planning to take some 500z/1k shots till the end of the year, but Im treating it more as a chance to learn from better regs than having a higher hourly.

I get what your saying but still having only played for few months I think him sticking to crushing 200z and at least save up a bunch that way whenever he does decide to play 500z or other higher stakes he will have plenty of buy ins to feel comfortable doing so. I think this is fine for zoom & if you are playing professionally.

Got absolutely demolished at the tables today. Huge amount of coolers not going my way, but whats more important is that my play was abysmal. Couldnt focus, wouldnt even put players on ranges, was just clicking buttons basicaly. Didnt take a break in the middle of the session which is a huge mistake on its own. Cant allow these things to happen, I wouldnt even beat 100z playing this way.

1) this guy loves breaking my KK, did it 3 times today



2) deservedly stacked by a fellow grinder after a bad play



3) weird




Overall no interesting hands. Made plenty of huge bluffs which went through, other than that ****loads of coolers going either way.

Studying went great yesterday, went through every hand in detail, which Im very happy about. Today Im gonna analyze some spots, but mainly work on polishing my presession warmup and finding out how I can increase my focus during the session.

Well well what do we have here. Another PGC heater thread + rapidfish talking absolute crap. In for the doom switch. Judging by H2, 4betting KTs utg (lul) its not far away. H3. bet the turn. Not impressed at all so far.

Thanks for the tips mirage, you mind if I take notes?

What would your 4betting range be on UTG vs small 3b sizing? Dont have Monker solutions for it, but from what Ive seen youre a walking solver, so help me out if you could. Thanks in advance!

I'm not really interested in helping mediocre regs too much these days, but I will say my 4bet range would not include hands that are strong enough to flat or hands that are easily dominated, so I don't end up getting owned exactly as you did. I'm pretty sure I learned that back on 5nl. I doubt you even really know why you 4bet that combo.

Speaking from memory so could be wrong but I think monker does 4bet kts there in the 15-20% ball park.

Microdonk here and not a huge fan of trolls, but I think he has a good point here. Maybe QQ+, AKs, AKo, A5s-A2s, and flat AQs and JJ-99?

it does, roughly 15%

he doesnt, you can pm me if you'd like me to explain. cheers

So I'm 85% correct (even higher in actual practice) but I don't have a point? lul.

KT can be flatted folded or 4b. Kind of whatever hand vs a 3b ip

Ty, pm´d you.

He was OOP

Jose your thread has already gone up a level since I joined. You should be grateful I'm wasting my time here.

all hands you 4bet bluff with oop are strong enough to flat mirage, you are clueless

I guess you know more than Doug Polk. lul.

doug polk is a player to trust?

Thread has potential. So many y' regs

GL will be following