Challenge / August report
Hey, it’s been a while since the last update and it’s about time I made a comprehensive overview of what was a very intense and colourful month for me.
August graph:
Contrary to what I stated in the last update, I did manage to find the brakes in the end and rather ended the month more sensibly instead of pushing myself to do things in a way that ended up being suboptimal and somewhat damaging in at least some ways. Took some rest, focused a little bit more on quality in the end and didn’t even go for a round number of 200k hands volume. No regrets about the decision to slow down – felt very great and even beneficial in the end.
In hindsight, August and the challenge itself has still been a great as well as an educating experience despite all the frustration and actual failure in the end. Could I have made it ever at all? Definitely. My general approach could have been better, as well as my performance for sure. Variance, of course, is also still a factor even for the volume I put in, although I do not intend to blame it too much for my not succeeding and the truth is that its impact is not easy to measure anyways. All in all – with the experience I have now I’m sure I’d have a much better shot at making it now than I did when I initially anounced that I’d try.
The results this month are quite horrible and the reasons for that are likely much the same as the reasons why I failed the challenge as a whole.
EV winrate this month:
1.71
Volume:
196 140
There are quite a few conclusions that I’ve come to regarding why I failed, what I didn’t take into account, what I didn’t do as well, etc. after all this and some of the more relevant ones I consider worth sharing.
Not a big surprise, but the major if not the only reason I failed was bad quality of play.
Without doubt my play was far from perfect during this period. As counterintuitive as it may sound, on paper I was a much better player each month than the month before but due to several reasons that just was not the case at the tables. The reasons being as follows:
Going for volume just simply decreases quality of play
Everybody knows it. I sort of did as well but did not take that into account consciously. Just hearing it from somebody else is not the same as noticing the difference in praxis. And it took me a long time to realise that one cannot solve problem situations just as well and precisely when playing 12+ tables as when playing only 6-8. And I kept trying to play 12+ tables like as if I was playing 6-8, for a long time not understanding why suddenly playing has become ever so more frustrating. What I should have done instead – just keep everything simple and not get into more complicated situations than necessary. Maximum precision and going for max EV is not what you do when going for volume the way I did. At least not for me. Or at least not yet. Since I did not get this for such a long time, I kept getting myself into problem spots and that’s the fastest way to start making mistakes or suboptimal plays, which I ended up doing a lot.
Playing a lot of tables decreases table management skills
It’s already more difficult to make good decisions while having so many active tables that keep popping up with new and diverse spots. It’s not getting easier if apart from that I also have to focus on setting up new tables as well as identifying bad ones. In praxis that often meant that I would open a client, start looking for a new table and before I’ve managed to join a waiting list, the client has automatically become minimised because another table needs my attention. That cycle would sometimes repeat itself several times before I manage to get the table I want, creating minor frustration as well as confusion. Often that would also mean that I ignore the tables and join a new one quickly and then discover that I’ve got several not so easy decisions to make under extreme time pressure. And it neither helps me with effectively setting up the necessary tables the way I want, nor does it help my performance since that just gives me more tasks to try and deal with while having a lot of side tasks to playing is the last thing I really want. Not difficult to see how that could have affected me over the time span of 3 months. Although I have to say that despite it being frustrating, I dealt with it this somewhat well, albeit still suboptimally.
Multitabling is different on each site and depends on the number of players at the table
This I should have understood much sooner: 12 tables on site A can easily be a completely different experience on site B. There are sites on which playing 6 tables can be somewhat of a challenge. Not understanding this and still going for a fixed goal of playing a set amount of tables is dangerous if playing on a site that has no time bank, is buggy and lags and just simply has **** software. This caused major problems in a wide variety of areas on just about an everyday basis. While frustrating, it actually improved my reaction and playing speed, so I did get something out of this in the end. But still, I don’t even want to know how much money I lost because of overlooking this factor.
The other thing I overlooked is that playing twelve 6-handed tables is not the same as a mixture of 6-handed, 5-handed, 4-handed, and even 3-handed tables. So essentially I ended up having a fixed braindead approach of always having 12 active tables no matter what, not paying attention to how that often backfires with additional time pressure, which alongside all the other afore-mentioned factors is the last thing I needed.
Experimenting with new plays while improving is likely going to cost money initially
During these 3 months I’ve started experimenting more and more with different kind of plays that are quite cool + actually are even very profitable under certain conditions. Arguably, I could have postponed these experiments for the sake of the challenge but a) long term gain is more important to me; and b) I wouldn’t be able to resist the temptation anyways. Long story short – trying out new things until I’m able to either implement them well or asses them as not desirable for me will cost money for me. In this case I even had non-desirable conditions under which to experiment so I probably ended up losing a little bit more in these experiments than I should have. Lesson learned.
Performance is affected by mental and physical state
Needless to say, I did experience a lot of frustration and there were times when I felt it more and times when it was less noticeable. I cannot assess to what extent my mental state really affected my performance as I still tend to believe that since it does not affect my strategic knowledge about spots I should be able to make just as good decisions as long as I am able to assess the factors precisely and emotionlessly. But in praxis I still found myself misunderstanding some situations or overlooking some factors in those days where I felt a little bit more **** than usual, and the cause could be identified as rather emotional. I do not make tilt plays but there was at least one if not two completely mindless tilt calldowns I made just out of spite on one of my very bad days. And also at least one double barrel that I also rather made out of spite while tilting. Those are huge exceptions and it felt very weird afterwards. That was just not me. Interesting to know that I have this dark side to me as well and that I am breakable for now if enough pressure is applied. But apart from those few cases the effect of my mental state was more felt in terms of me losing concentration/focus as well as me being drained of necessary mental energy as a result of that state.
Now the physical state is also an interesting factor. In order to get the necessary volume I often ended up sleeping only 5-6 hours. Not difficult to imagine that lack of sleep affects energy levels, right? I did not notice the difference until I actually stopped the challenge and got some more sleep and focused a bit more on quality. The difference was extreme – my thought process was much clearer and I also just felt much better in general. Performance went up. OK, sleeping enough is not difficult to fix. Alternatively I could also look into improving the quality of sleep and that would probably help. But come to think of it, my lifestyle as a whole is quite ****. 0 physical activity for quite some time. Not enough rest from poker-related activites. Frequently suboptimal nutrition choices. I’ve started fantasising about what a machine I would be if only my lifestyle was better if just adding a little bit more sleep makes such a big difference.
Focusing on volume incorrectly results in misclicks, time-outs, and misreading the board/hand
This was the biggest problem I had that was caused by most of the above-mentioned factors together. I cannot assess the damage done by all this but I can only guess that I’d rather not know. I’m really not exaggerating when I’m saying that there maybe were a few days during the challenge when I did not make a misclick or when I did not time out with a strong hand either preflop or postflop.
Misclicking was mostly not the biggest issue in terms of money lost as a result of it but it still was extremely tilting. I can deal with suckouts, losing flips and even making mistakes all day long and I will not even get affected much unless it happens frequently several times in a row or unless something else has made me lose my inner peace before. But one misclick/time-out/misread and I lose my ****. That’s when I do swear, and it’s quite nasty. I smashed my mouse against the table at least twice uncontrollably during the challenge. Even writing about this and remembering it all makes me angry. That’s crazy because I’m actually really angry right now, lol. I guess that what makes me so angry about this and not other situations in poker is the fact that it’s completely avoidable, stupid and expensive. Almost each day I timed out with something like AA/KK/QQ/JJ/AK preflop at least once. I once even timed out with a set on the river. And then, of course, come all the other hands of various strength and importance. I guess that this really cost me a ****load of money.
The misreading part was not as often but when it did occur it cost me my stack. The classic A4 = AA was nothing new to me in this challenge. What was refreshingly new though was the never thought of K4 = AK. And even the completely super tilting AT = AA. No really, wtf? AT = AA? I was very very pissed off.
Most confusing were the situations where I suddenly find a table where I’m, let’s say, on the river with a completely weird trash ahdn and I don’t even remember how I entered the hand and why the hell I’m in it in the first place. That happened occasionally and in different kind of variations and did make me feel weird. But I’ve heard that there are other players that have the same problem, so for now there’s little reason to think that I’m slowly going crazy. For what it’s worth, it was interesting to try and come up with the optimal solution in cases where it was not a clear give up once I started to play the rest of the hand consciously.
Summary
I feel awesome about having gone through this and I’ve definitely learned a lot. It could be argued that this was unnecessary and damaging but I feel like I’ve actually done something big for myself and I’m very eager to see what I’m able to do now when I’ll be focusing a lot on improving and quality. I’m proud that I was completely all-in on this, trying to squeeze out every free second of my time to get more volume in by taking this to the extreme, eating very fast, sleeping little and trying to even save time and increase hands played per hour by making the fastest clicks possible while playing. Say all you want about monetary goals but I dare to say that despite it being the official target, it’s actually about something much bigger than reaching that figure.
Challenge start: Beginning of June
Challenge graph:
Challenge status: roughly 50 000 / 60 000 EUR after rakeback
Volume: 450 176
EV winrate: 4.09