Quote:
Originally Posted by spirit123
I think THE best games in general are the shorthanded ones from like 2-7 am when everybody is leftover from the night before, or just came from a bar or a party, especially if we can get a straddle going. There's just a certain vibe around it, like relaxed, and gambley more. And when people gamble, I win.
I agree. This is my bread and butter.
Quote:
I think playing mostly TAG OOP and extremely LAG in position is the way to go. People fold more when you have position on them so your cards don't need much showdown value most of the time.
This is generally good, but I think it's easy to overdo. I think the key is continually reassess how effective your adaptions are, because it's not easily quantifiable when you move into exploitative territory.
Quote:
Tilt is a major issue for me. I go through phases where I am extremely good at controlling it, and then some where I'm not. I have been doing my best to put my heart into poker again and to learn more about the game through a theoretical and mathematical perspective, and I still sometimes felt during this week that I was playing extremely well, but I let my emotions affect my play a bit too much.
I think this is a lot more normal people let off (the best players I find are most honest about this). Acknowledging it is the first step!
Quote:
Hero calling should be done with basically only the top of our range in most 3/5-5/T games, especially in big pots. People just don't bluff that much of the river I think, especially against someone who's involved in lots of hands.
I think being tighter calling down in mid-low live games is correct, in lots of spots where most fish don't bluff much (especially big pots). HOWEVER, I think it's important to change the way we look at poker and use our lingo, because "hero calling" be definition is a call that is thin, regardless of the strength of our hand, so it's not really hero calling if we're doing it with the top of our range (or a hand that is just good). If anything I think blockers are more useful for hero calling, or indeed, if a player never bluffs, then we can just never hero call (and only call hands that beat their value range)
You mention LA, where do you play usually?
Quote:
My sexual life and conditioning would have been very different growing up in an Asian country. The media desexualizes Asian-American men and it's affected how I relate to the other gender, for better or for worse. Before I started playing poker again, I was just hitting my stride with women, but I'm putting it on the back burner, while I make this cash.
I don't want to get into an antagonistic debate about this, but I think all men would do well to examine their relationship with women. I think there's no two ways around it, the way media depicts Asian men (and also Asian women) make it pretty tough, on both groups, actually, but in different ways. I know so many Asian men who get unfairly judged when trying to date, and Asian women who are expected to act like dolls. I read somewhere you mention something about redpill; like I said I don't really wanna get into it, but I like your posts (you seem to have a good attitude), and I want you to succeed, so I just want to show you my perspective here, and you can do what you will with it:
So as you can guess belief system is very opposed to redpill/mra/pua types. You might've read my thread where I mention I support women in my life--I have close relationships with my ex and other friends, and I do not feel exploited or used. They add so much to my life, they've helped me through so much **** and at times have devoted themselves to care for me when there was nothing they could gain from me (I have tons of health and mental health problems). Idk your specific ideology, so I don't want to assume, but I think it's easy for a person to be resentful of a lot of the typical way people view romance or relationships with women, and I think that's reasonable, especially seeing as, as an Asian man (I've lots of personal experience with that kind of dynamic), you've got the short end of the stick. What I want to say though is that redpill is not the only alternative perspective to the mainstream one. You can reject traditional ideas and expectations about relationships without going to that one.
I've found that becoming a lot healthier and independent as a person makes you a lot more successful in dating and relationship. I've mentioned the women in my life who've helped me a lot, but honestly, when I was dependent on them (and also at times when they were dependent on me) our relationship suffered, because relationships that aren't balanced have lots of trapfalls. It's not easy to have a positive equal relationship with someone you're dependent on, or whom is dependent on you (and that's why traditional relationships between men/women often end up feeling so parasitic at times). I feel like people glorify codependent relationships, but imo the best relationships are ones where the individuals don't NEED each other, but still choose to, because they want to, and because they enjoy and enrich each other.
As a poker player, and one who has to spend time focused on poker related pursuits, I think it's wise to look into more casual or non-monogamous dating if you aren't already. I think it can help with making relationships less restrictive, and more something that's enriching (it's quite popular with poker players from what I've read), and gives you more opportunities to dip your toes into dating without committing yourself and, I hope, being embittered or resentful about the whole process. I admit that not a lot of people are open to that kind of thing, though, so I guess your mileage may vary.
Quote:
There are more people who study the math. Optimal poker play is much less of a mystery and most people know the basics, even if just at the theoretical level. People who haven't actually studied the game are at a massive disadvantage and a lot of these guys either stop playing because they realize it's impossible to beat the game or they are forced to start adapting in just a few weeks/months.
Poker is a lot tougher these days. I hear LA is filled with Europeans nowadays, and a bunch of players with online backgrounds.
That's why you should give PLO a try.
That said, if you work hard, you can always stay ahead of the curve. I do a lot of studying and have found that it remotivated me a lot, finding out how much more room I have to improve, and how much more better I can be than the opposition. I highly suggest developing an organised approach towards studying.