Before I started the first session of this PGC-thread I gave myself some basic rules to follow:
Quote:
Originally Posted by Nachtwerk
- Follow the open raising chart and review hands where I didn’t
- Play a 3bet or fold game from the SB
- Avoid bluff catching and going for thin value
- Mark hands for review
- every 500 hands: take a short break
I checked if I kept to them in the first 10k hand batch:
Did I follow my preset ranges ?
I came up with this rule because of Artie’s advice after I posted my stats for review:
Quote:
Originally Posted by ArtyMcFly
@ Nachtwerk, your main problem is that you're too loose and too aggro in just about every spot. Zoom plays very tight, so if you're seeing the flop with a wider/weaker range than the average player, you can't c-bet at a high frequency and expect to win at showdown the majority of the time.
I saw your threads about opening ranges, and sorting those out should put you in good stead, because your level of aggression should work very well if you start with slightly tighter/stronger ranges.
Something like 14% UTG, 18% MP, 25% CO, 40% BTN should work a treat. That will mean your c-betting ranges have more "quality" and less "quantity". i.e. You won't be c-betting with total air so often.
One minor stat that caught my eye was your "fold to steal" in the SB. At 78%, it's a little low. You shouldn't be playing more than 20% of hands in that seat if someone else has opened. You should mostly fold, but you can 3-bet about 15% vs CO or BTN. Give more respect to EP/MP opens and just fold more in the SB.
I think that once you've tightened up to about 22-23% overall VPIP, and continue to study (inc. posting hands on the forum) you'll probably start winning quite well.
Just posting the threads where I try to build the ranges so I can keep all the stuff I post together in this blog. It could be nice to look back on if I ever make progress:
These posts lead to his chart:
I know I have nowhere close to a samplesize to make assumptions about which hand outside of the chart is profitable and which are not. But there might be enough in there to see some tendencies. It's also good to check that when I deviate I do it with a good reason. I checked all lost hands who are on the chart. I probably could have had spent my time better but there is no point in setting guidelines if you don't keep to them (or checked if you kept to them).
UTG:
1.6k hands played, 40 hands outside of the chart for a net loss of 0.31$. It’s not of real use to see why I deviated as UTG. There are so many players behind that I can’t expect to find a valid reason to justify why I should’ve left the preset plan.
12 of the deviations were ATo for some reason and they did the worst. KJo made some extra bb’s. I tend to play some extra SC’s too and added some baby pocketpairs. All in all I’m very happy with my UTG stats. It’s actually one of my best positions. However I doubt that’s a good sign.
MP
1.6k hands, 68 deviations for a net loss of 1.77$. Same as for UTG there are no real arguments for adjusting with this many players yet to act and with probably not enough hands on villains either to have valid reads.
lots ATo to be found again, I think I had them in a previous range. And then there were some Kx, Qx. The lower SC’s that showed up didn’t do well. But is’t a stupid sample anyway. I really like my baby pocketpairs for no reason.
CO
1.6k hands, 26 deviations for a net loss of 0.46$. If it wasn’t for one big losing hand It would have been some extra bb here. Only 5 losing hands here and only one was really bad played.
The hands added all were Axo and Kxs and a single K8o hand which costed me a buck. I might need to get a tattoo on my mousehand that says: don’t bluff fish !
BU
1.6k hands, 41 deviations and a net profit of 0.39$. 14 losing hands. The losing hands were steals supported by no handsample or just gone wrong. Deviation from BU was good. The losing hands reviewed weren’t all good spots to do so.
Conclusion:
The leaks aren’t to be found here. (And yes, I know I need to have a close look on my showdown hands. I’m just a bit afraid and not sure if I’m going to like what I’m going to find there. So let me postpone that just a bit more.). At least now I know I butcher good opening hands instead of crappy ones.
3bet-or fold from blinds
I didn’t call a single time in the 10k sample. On first sight I did some weird things with my 3bet range. I didn’t had any premade ranges for SB while playing these hands but it looks kind of weird.
In this post:
Micro's Zoom 6max: SB range I looked for feedback and I came to this:
My 135 3bets from the SB however made up for this:
µ
Looks like there is some room for improvement here. But for the next 10k hands the 3bet game in general is going to be studied so I leave it at this for now.
Avoid bluff catching and going for thin value
This is were it is at. I just do what I do without really knowing when to call and when not. I’m even reluctant to face the elephant in the room. In this post:
'Improving my game' : I’m thinking about a coach. To be honest with myself, I might fix most part with mere discipline and focus.I think I even wouldn’t like someone else to see the crap I pull.
. Going to spent some time studying my non show down losses to see what I can do about it.
Marking hands and taking breaks
I did mark hands for review and I kept to the mini-breaks after 500 hands. But I didn’t actually review enough hands and I played to many 500h blocks in a row . For the lack of reviewed hands I blame a lack of skill in reviewing. I don’t trust my judgement and a lot of the questions I have or so small or stupid I don’t feel comfortable posting in forums so I'm kind of stuck with that. That's also where the idea of a getting a coach or finding someone who actually knows how to play poker to talk to originated from.