And that´s how the day ended. Very fishy tonight, and despite one big pot where I just screwed up vs a reg, for the rest of the day my play seemed fine. Lots of average to difficult spots, but I think I navigated them without making too many mistakes.
Gave up on moving up to 10nl next week. Instead gonna try and stay the next 10 days without looking at my results (lol????). As I always say here, it helps a lot my game when I can stay away and resist the temptation. And it doesn´t mean I won´t review HHs, I´m talking only about the money and the graph.*
*But I´m being too lazy the last few days and not reviewing any HH. Have to change this asap.
Quick note, just to finish the day. I was working mostly with snowie ranges for the microstakes, which, for anyone who looked at them, are very tight. I can understand (and agree) with their reasoning for this. Rake. But there´s just one problem: snowie assumes that, no mather how small we are playing, all our opponents are optimal bots, so we either play the tighter ranges or we´re gonna lose $ after rake. Obv this is not realistic.
Atm I´m working into adding a few smaller pps for the set value into early positions, as it seems they are one of the best hands to have against fish and weaker regs when we flop a set. Not overdoing it, just instead of opening only TT+ from utg for example, I´m now opening 77+, and then increasing the number the more we get closer to the BTN. Keeping the remaining no pp hands as close as possible to snowie.
What do you guys think? Are pps the best hands to add in soft games? I was thinking about one or two combos of lower scs like 65s, but everyone seems to agree they don´t play well oop. Snowie likes suited aces, as I do, due to the nut potential, but they are not enough I think to maximize ev. And sets play almost by themselves ip or oop.
Cheers!
Last edited by FazendeiroBH; 04-18-2019 at 10:36 PM.