Clanty transparently shared his results in his first RIO video. That also doesn't include his (crushing) results the last ~2 years. Roger, where are you getting your opinion from?

His content is without a shadow of the doubt the best content regarding cash game poker out there.

And as for credibility, I'll put my entire reputation on the line to say that neither of you have a clue what you're talking about. I've studied with Clanty for nearly 4 years and my success at high stakes has been almost entirely been down to our friendship.

You guys just see someone play a different style and jump to all sorts of wild conclusions.

Haters gonna hate !

I only go by demonstrated results (proof) as should anyone with a brain rather than anecdotes from mates (lol). Are the ROI results just the ones he last posted in this thread a while back with a lol sample size for every stake?

What is the sample for this alleged crushing the last 2 years and why not post them publicly?

Why exactly should he share his results with you? Are you paying him anything in any form?

According to Paisting, 2NL on 888 is the toughest game on the internet. Has Clanty shown he can beat it? I want to see some proof.

It´s not even that Clanty is a bad coach and everyone hates him. I like Clanty's videos, but I´m just an unknown and my opinion doesn´t matter. We also have this guy:



This is all about some feud Clanty got in the past and they are coming for revenge, or some trolls like mirage who doesn´t have anything better to do, or Clanty is a bad guy irl and they want to discredit his poker related stuff bc of that (revenge also I guess).

this needs to be settled with some hu4rollz

Literally and I mean literally the best free content out there. I always been a bit skeptical on getting RIO subscription (for example some content creators play in my pools and I consider them weakish, and imo self-study might be higher ev-time) but I was genuinely about to sign up just to study clanty"s content, I already rewatched the free stuff a bunch of times w/ running every spot myself to dive deeper on his explanations. Think it's the opposite of someone just showing theory without going deeper and that this is a clear example of someone actually going deeper on the "why" and who clearly put in the work to teach us.

And just because he doesn't have statname graph porn doesn't mean he is not qualified to coach, I mean trying to 1-1 copy GTO in 6max isn't necessarily the most profitable approach to poker anyway (or atleast for (MOST :P) humans) but that doesn't mean the understanding of the game can be outstanding and can be taught very well.

And how the **** do you expect to make crazy bb/100h when you are battling these line ups on the regular anyway?



If he is bumhunting -70bb/100h whales on the regular it would be a different story xd

Maybe his coaching is terrible idk Clanty other than his content stuff but think the arguments being made aren't valid and judged by his content he seems like a solid coach or atleast someone with a great understanding of the game

Because he is selling services as a poker coach so its sort of important for customers to have proof of his results. So far there has been a lot of hot air and bleating in here but not a single graph. I know its 2022 and people are dumber than ever but this is hilarious even for 2+2. How many more Clanty mates are going to come out telling everyone he is da best?

Hi AAnimeLLove.

Well you mam are a prime example of this.

Hi tastyyy!

Yeah, I´m dumb, otherwise wouldn´t take so long to see it was you.

Do we still have your video presentation about coaches on youtube? That one you posted on GazzyB thread if I´m not mistaken, the one you draw pretty insightful things using Paint.

Cheers

surely tasty can't still be on 2+2 doing this lmao

I have a run it once membership simply to watch his and psek videos, I don't need to see his results because frankly they don't matter to me.
The line ups he plays he could very well be losing in, They are some of the toughest games in the world lol.

He has clearly put a lot time off the table studying with solvers and has a good understanding of theory, Him showing a 500k hand graph at 200nl would not make me want his coaching. Plenty of coaches who do that and frankly are not as good at coaching/explaining as Clanty.

You seem to care a lot of him proving his results but frankly it is up to the ones getting coached and paying for his services.