Quote:
Originally Posted by PokerPhilosopher
Bad luck with the tourney ButterflySymmetry. I've read through your thread several days ago, and saved the link to keep track of your progress as you continue this challenge. It's the type of thing I'm looking to do in about a year or so.. gonna spend the next year saving up money so I can have a bankroll (as well as some savings to live off of for a few months). Then take a shot at playing live poker (as well as a bit of online) for a living.
I've got a question for you though, since you seem to be doing nicely at NL200 live cash.. How do you play at the live $1/2 tables? Do you play a fairly standard TAG/LAG style? Do you limp a lot of hands, knowing you'll probably be able to win some big pots when you hit big? Just curious what works best at this level live.. Sorry if you talked about this earlier. It's been several days since I've gone through this thread and I can't remember if you said anything about it.
Just wondering how the larger raise sizes affect the TAG game, and if limping/calling might be a better way to make money at this level live... I've been doing the latter more, but don't have a big sample size to determine if it's a good longer-term strategy. It just seems to be a good way to find situations to exploit the weaker players... Curious how you play...
Sounds like u r taking a gd approach, and best of luck if u decide to take a shot at it. If I can lend some advice I wd say take it slow, and start small. Be patient and don't go into it full throttle. The games will always be there the next day. If u make it ur job, it can be BRUTAL at many times. U have to be head strong, persevere and stay even keel. If u trust ur game, then go after it. If it isn't working, then have a plan B. Having something to fall back on will take the stress off a bit. (I.e. college degree, job prospects or traits,etc). Best of luck.
As far as style of play I prob lean towards LAG. But my position dictates my hands played/selection more than anything. I like to play hands in position. I will fold a hand like J8 in ep, but will limp w it in lp. Something like KQ I may call in ep, but may raise to $17 in lp if its a limp fest to me. In that case, I may take it down there, or get a heads up. Heads up in position is long term profitable. Also small pairs are played so horribly at this level. People never seem to pay attention to stack sizes. And either call too much preflop with their pps, or fold when they shd b calling preflop. Both of these are stack size dependent (implied odds). I also like to play as many pots as possible with the fish at the table. I try to mix it up too, sometimes I will bet draws, sometimes check call, sometimes check raise draws. Its all situational depending on primarily who I'm playing that draw against, and stack sizes. I may check call or lead out a draw against an aggro player, or check raise a tight player w draws. Again it's "situational". There are so many regs i play w daily, and i can read them easier than my 2yr old's book collection. They play same way everyday. I don't want to b that guy, and I want to keep my opponents guessing. I have folded some big hands that I wd call if person x bet it, but its becomes an easy fold if person y bets it. It all comes back to paying attention to detail, and understanding betting patterns with certain players. Some players i play w will only raise if they have the nuts, and its easy folds. I know this from paying attention to detail, and playing w them day n day out. In closing, i guess my style is - I do what makes since to me at that particular time. I try to be creative without getting too fancy. I do things that people prob don't have a clue why, but it always makes clear since to me. Sometimes i feel i must b playing a different game. One example of this came today when utg+1 made it 7x and 2 callers before i call in sb w A
10
. Then large blind said raise $10, and was clueless that it was already raised once from utg+1. Since verbal is binding he had to make it $25 total. I could tell he didnt really want to put in the 3 bet, and this is where the meta game comes into to play. So once he made it to $25, utg+1 JUST FLATS as does the other 2. It gets back to me, and i 4bet all in to $350. It was risky, but i thought i could squeeze it through since it was clear LBlind didnt really mean nor want to put in the 3bet, and since utg+1 and others flat. By just flatting the "oops"3 bets from lb, they must of not had AA,KK,QQ. If holding one of those 3 hands they wd most likely 4bet the "oops" raise from lb. Since they didnt, i figured my big 4bet shove wd take down the $125 pot. The only hand that would call that big of raise wd b AA,KK,QQ, and i already eliminated these hands. If i was wrong and someone did flat behind w a big hand, then i at least have a type of hand that could suck out with (possible over card, flush and straight possibilities). This play wouldn't work against more knowledgeable players tho. Higher level players can see right through that move. In this case, it was the right line up at the right time kind of play. @pokerphilosopher thanks again. Everybody plays differently. Just play every hand YOUR best, and do what makes since to YOU. Best of luck.
@h_ven thanks for checking in. Best of luck to u.
Last edited by ButterflySymmetry; 03-12-2013 at 12:19 AM.