Open Side Menu Go to the Top
Register
Showing you how it's done: a microstakes odyssey Showing you how it's done: a microstakes odyssey

03-07-2017 , 01:32 AM
I've been lurking for awhile and have noticed a lot of people doing '2nl --> highsteaks XD' posts.. and seen approximately 0 people pass even 10nl

So I decided to show these people how it's done.
I have never beaten any stake over a meaningful sample. However I have always believed that with the right amount of work there is nothing that a person cannot do. I'm going to apply that theory to this challenge.

I have deposited $50 to my pokerstars account and will be moving from 2nlz and onwards using aggressive but not insane brm (so ~30-50BI).

For now I have only two concrete goals:
  • move to 5nlz within 4 months
  • be beating stakes >= 25nlz within the next 400k hands
as well as the more loose goals of putting in a ****load of study-volume and a sufficient amount of actual-volume..

vamo
Showing you how it's done: a microstakes odyssey Quote
03-07-2017 , 04:50 AM
Title was promising mate but I gotta say the "5nlz within 4 months" was a bit of a let down lol. How many hours do you plan on playing?
Showing you how it's done: a microstakes odyssey Quote
03-08-2017 , 02:35 AM
Quote:
Originally Posted by flawz01
Title was promising mate but I gotta say the "5nlz within 4 months" was a bit of a let down lol. How many hours do you plan on playing?
I asked to be in the head-seat to set up a mountain of myself.
The time it takes to get from 2nl to 5nl is not important.
For this challenge what matters is how long it takes for me to get to 50nlz.
In the bird's eye, to highstakes.
I will play as much as I feel appropriate.

Relevant to how I view the approach of others to learning the game:

Quote:
The Heart-mind governs the Buddha’s words; the gateless governs the lineage. Since the gate of the Dharma is gateless, just how do you pass through alive? How do you not see the Way? Things that enter through the gate are not the family treasures. Things that are obtained in the beginning through conditions become destroyed in the end. Doesn’t a big speech like this seem to raise waves without a wind, to gouge a wound in good flesh? Trying to solve the problem by such cold-water stagnant words is comparable to shaking a stick to hit the moon. The boot stands between an itch and a scratch. To be happy mix with and ford the stream.
Showing you how it's done: a microstakes odyssey Quote
03-08-2017 , 06:13 AM
Ok that's all great but some real life numbers would still be nice, it is a poker forum after all. Like what do you consider to be a "****load of study volume" and "sufficient playing volume"? It's just all a bit vague for someone looking to show 100% of aspiring players "how it's done".
Showing you how it's done: a microstakes odyssey Quote
03-14-2017 , 02:44 AM
Quote:
Originally Posted by flawz01
Ok that's all great but some real life numbers would still be nice, it is a poker forum after all. Like what do you consider to be a "****load of study volume" and "sufficient playing volume"? It's just all a bit vague for someone looking to show 100% of aspiring players "how it's done".

****-tier banter, 0% creativity and lied about the OP

focusing on exact number of hours studied/played or the exact study: play ratio doesn't make much sense. What does matter is the general way in which you approach the situation.
To give a couple of examples:
  1. I'm very new to the game therefore I shold spend a lot more time studying than playing (exponential metacognitive effect)
  2. I want to get pretty good very quickly therefore I should devote a lot of time to getting better (also exponential metacognitive effect)

If someone wants to learn from a thread like mine it makes little sense that they should care about whether I spend 4 hours a day studying or 9 or 9.35654. What matters is that I'm spending a shitload of time studying.

I will continue to explain my ideas as I post updates.


My first 5k hands:


At this point I don't care too much about my immediate results and am instead focusing on improving my overall game. However, I am happy that I didn't lose money - don't want to be tending towards busto
Showing you how it's done: a microstakes odyssey Quote
03-14-2017 , 02:55 AM
Spoiler:
Poker Stars $0.01/$0.02 No Limit Hold'em - 6 players
Hand History Converter

BTN: $2.02
SB: $1.76
BB: $1.28
UTG: $3.03
Hero (MP): $4.30
CO: $5.04

Pre Flop: ($0.03) Hero is MP with J J
1 fold, Hero raises to $0.06, 1 fold, BTN raises to $0.19, SB calls $0.18, 1 fold, Hero calls $0.13

Flop: ($0.59) 3 9 5 (3 players)
SB checks, Hero checks, BTN checks

Turn: ($0.59) 3 (3 players)
SB bets $0.46, Hero calls $0.46, BTN folds

River: ($1.51) 8 (2 players)
SB bets $1.11 all in, Hero calls $1.11

Spoiler:
Final Pot: $3.73
SB shows Kc Ah (a pair of Threes)
Hero shows Jd Jh (two pair, Jacks and Threes)
Hero wins $3.60
(Rake: $0.13)




Spoiler:
Poker Stars $0.01/$0.02 No Limit Hold'em - 6 players
Hand History Converter

BTN: $1.99
Hero (SB): $6.03
BB: $2.51
UTG: $1.85
MP: $2.80
CO: $2.54

Pre Flop: ($0.03) Hero is SB with A 9
2 folds, CO raises to $0.06, 1 fold, Hero raises to $0.20, 1 fold, CO calls $0.14

Flop: ($0.42) 9 2 6 (2 players)
Hero checks, CO bets $0.25, Hero calls $0.25

Turn: ($0.92) 2 (2 players)
Hero checks, CO bets $0.57, Hero calls $0.57

River: ($2.06) 3 (2 players)
Hero checks, CO checks

Spoiler:
Final Pot: $2.06
Hero shows Ah 9h (two pair, Nines and Deuces)
CO mucks 8d Ad
Hero wins $1.99
(Rake: $0.07)




Spoiler:
Poker Stars $0.01/$0.02 No Limit Hold'em - 6 players
Hand History Converter

BTN: $2.10
Hero (SB): $2.00
BB: $4.08
UTG: $4.17
MP: $2.00
CO: $1.88

Pre Flop: ($0.03) Hero is SB with K A
UTG raises to $0.12, 2 folds, BTN calls $0.12, Hero calls $0.11, 1 fold

Flop: ($0.38) 9 T 3 (3 players)
Hero checks, UTG checks, BTN checks

Turn: ($0.38) 7 (3 players)
Hero checks, UTG bets $0.24, BTN folds, Hero calls $0.24

River: ($0.86) T (2 players)
Hero checks, UTG checks

Spoiler:
Final Pot: $0.86
Hero shows Kc As (a pair of Tens)
UTG mucks Jc Ah
Hero wins $0.83
(Rake: $0.03)


Spoiler:
Poker Stars $0.01/$0.02 No Limit Hold'em - 6 players
Hand History Converter

BTN: $2.00
SB: $2.88
BB: $2.00
Hero (UTG): $2.18
MP: $2.16
CO: $2.59

Pre Flop: ($0.03) Hero is UTG with Q Q
Hero raises to $0.06, 1 fold, CO raises to $0.18, 3 folds, Hero calls $0.12

Flop: ($0.39) 4 2 8 (2 players)
Hero checks, CO bets $0.19, Hero calls $0.19

Turn: ($0.77) K (2 players)
Hero checks, CO bets $0.56, Hero folds

Spoiler:
Final Pot: $0.77
CO wins $0.74
(Rake: $0.03)

Showing you how it's done: a microstakes odyssey Quote
03-14-2017 , 06:31 AM
Hand I played just now
time to sleep, have to go to school in 7 hours

Poker Stars $0.01/$0.02 No Limit Hold'em - 6 players
Hand History Converter

BTN: $1.87
SB: $2.01
BB: $2.98
Hero (UTG): $5.32
MP: $2.02
CO: $1.93

Pre Flop: ($0.03) Hero is UTG with J J
Hero raises to $0.06, 4 folds, BB calls $0.04

Flop: ($0.13) J A 6 (2 players)
BB checks, Hero bets $0.10, BB calls $0.10

Turn: ($0.33) 9 (2 players)
BB checks, Hero bets $0.25, BB calls $0.25

River: ($0.83) 8 (2 players)
BB checks, Hero bets $0.63, BB raises to $1.62, Hero raises to $4.91 all in, BB calls $0.95 all in

Spoiler:
Final Pot: $5.97
BB shows Qc Td (a straight, Eight to Queen)
Hero shows Jh Js (three of a kind, Jacks)
BB wins $5.76
(Rake: $0.21)
Showing you how it's done: a microstakes odyssey Quote
03-14-2017 , 10:17 AM
Quote:
Originally Posted by Knowl3dge
****-tier banter, 0% creativity and lied about the OP

focusing on exact number of hours studied/played or the exact study: play ratio doesn't make much sense. What does matter is the general way in which you approach the situation.
They were genuine questions and genuine quotes. It wasn't supposed to be banter, it's obviously just your ego that makes you see it like that. I'll be unfollowing after that last post anyways so all the best with your goals mate. Cockiness and arrogance don't make for a good read...
Showing you how it's done: a microstakes odyssey Quote
03-14-2017 , 02:06 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by flawz01
They were genuine questions and genuine quotes. It wasn't supposed to be banter, it's obviously just your ego that makes you see it like that. I'll be unfollowing after that last post anyways so all the best with your goals mate. Cockiness and arrogance don't make for a good read...
Well if you weren't lying then you simply misinterpreted my post. The funny thing is that I interpret your response to my posts as being due to your ego. Thanks for the good luck, and I wish the same to you. Enjoying your thread.

Quote:
Originally Posted by flawz01
They were genuine questions and genuine quotes..
Also, just to be clear, they are not and were not genuine quotes.

Last edited by Knowl3dge; 03-14-2017 at 02:12 PM.
Showing you how it's done: a microstakes odyssey Quote
03-15-2017 , 11:45 PM
Hey guys I just wanted to post this as a quick strat check up - this is the standard line with pocketed queens right?

Poker Stars $0.01/$0.02 No Limit Hold'em - 6 players
Hand History Converter

BTN: $2.00
SB: $3.40
BB: $2.04
UTG: $2.32
MP: $4.61
Hero (CO): $2.47

Pre Flop: ($0.03) Hero is CO with Q Q
2 folds, Hero raises to $0.16, BTN calls $0.16, 1 fold, BB calls $0.14

Flop: ($0.49) A 2 5 (3 players)
BB checks, Hero bets $0.02, BTN calls $0.02, BB folds

Turn: ($0.53) A (2 players)
Hero checks, BTN bets $0.29, Hero calls $0.29

River: ($1.11) 7 (2 players)
Hero checks, BTN bets $1.53 all in, Hero calls $1.53

Spoiler:
Final Pot: $4.17
BTN shows 4c 4s (two pair, Aces and Fours)
Hero shows Qd Qh (two pair, Aces and Queens)
Hero wins $4.02
(Rake: $0.15)
Showing you how it's done: a microstakes odyssey Quote
03-16-2017 , 03:21 AM
Quote:
Originally Posted by Knowl3dge
Well if you weren't lying then you simply misinterpreted my post. The funny thing is that I interpret your response to my posts as being due to your ego. Thanks for the good luck, and I wish the same to you. Enjoying your thread.
Ok, I said I wouldn't but I will. First off, if you've been following my thread, then you'll know that my ego manifests as insecurities and self doubt, not arrogance and certainly not malice towards others. If you look at my posting history you'll see that 99% of it is positive or encouraging. The 1% that isn't is usually in response to cockiness or rudeness. Your initial post was both of those things:

Quote:
Originally Posted by Knowl3dge
I've been lurking for awhile and have noticed a lot of people doing '2nl --> highsteaks XD' posts.. and seen approximately 0 people pass even 10nl

So I decided to show these people how it's done.
That's rude and arrogant, especially when you then go on to say you've never beaten any stake before yourself. I've personally seen a minimum of 50 challenges starting at 2nl make it to at LEAST 10nl, so you're either lying or you haven't spent much time on the forums. Either way, you insulted everyone that's done so or is aspiring to do so.

Quote:
Originally Posted by Knowl3dge
Also, just to be clear, they are not and were not genuine quotes.
Just to be clear:

Quote:
Originally Posted by flawz01
"****load of study volume"
Quote:
Originally Posted by Knowl3dge
****load of study-volume
Quote:
Originally Posted by flawz01
"sufficient playing volume"?
Quote:
Originally Posted by Knowl3dge
sufficient amount of actual-volume
Quote:
Originally Posted by flawz01
"how it's done"
Quote:
Originally Posted by Knowl3dge
how it's done
Apologies, I missed out a hyphen and the word amount, as well as writing playing volume instead of actual-volume. I would've taken the time to be more accurate if I'd have known you were going to be so pedantic.

Also, I'm not sure if you was joking or not but that's certainly not a standard line to take with QQ's. We should never be 8x'ing pre (unless one of the players left to act is the hugest whale you've ever seen - and even then...) and should never be min betting flop (unless you know villain is likely to spazz out vs a min bet (and even then...). Make it ~3x pre and check flop. Playing turn and river the same if you think villain is capable of bluffing. If he seems on the tighter side we should be folding
Showing you how it's done: a microstakes odyssey Quote
03-16-2017 , 03:49 AM
Quote:
Originally Posted by flawz01
Ok, I said I wouldn't but I will
...
Sorry mate, I mildly misread your post. Your quotes were correct. For the record this thread is just meant to show the people who post failed microstakes 'moving up the ladder' type PGCs. Yes it's probably mildly rude but people obviously have the choice of not following if that upsets them. A choice most people have obviously opted for, albeit most likely for other reasons.

I plan on mostly updating at 5k-hand intervals. Since I don't want to unnecessarily clutter my thread I'll post my second graph a little early:



PSA:
Don't take this thread too seriously
I'm just here to run it up and have some fun
Obviously you shouldn't care if I call you ****, I haven't even beaten 2nl over a real sample yet, and for all you know I'm as dumb as a brick
My hope of course is that I do have success and anyone who wants to (and isn't way better than me) can learn from it

Spoiler:
QQ was a meme hand. would appreciate comments on any of the other hands I posted though


Conclusion: happy with results so far, and happy with how my study is going. Just letting the combos flow through me atm. Seems to me like you can't get much done in poker unless you have a solid framework for putting players on ranges, and I'm trying to do that through combos - you can't pre-inspect every spot of course, and that's where skill truly seems to become relevant. I'm still terribad but luckily 99.5% of everyone else at 2nlz is too. And I seem to be improving quickly.

Last edited by Knowl3dge; 03-16-2017 at 04:16 AM.
Showing you how it's done: a microstakes odyssey Quote
03-16-2017 , 04:20 AM
'Seem seem seem', flawz, you've made me doubt my writing. I do hope someone other than me enjoys this thread, although I am primarily doing this for myself.
Showing you how it's done: a microstakes odyssey Quote
03-16-2017 , 05:41 AM
Nice post, you've redeemed yourself in my eyes. Not that my opinion matters of course. Fwiw I think you write well but intent can easily get lost in translation. I read it as cockiness but your last post helps to clear a few things up. Your approach to the game will take you far if you keep applying yourself. The fact you even know what a range is puts you ahead of most of the field up to 10nl. I'm just about to start another session but I'll check out the hands later and try to help as best I can. Re-followed
Showing you how it's done: a microstakes odyssey Quote
03-16-2017 , 12:10 PM
I'm not really sure what's going on in this thread, but I'm subscribing.
Showing you how it's done: a microstakes odyssey Quote
03-19-2017 , 02:26 AM
Quote:
Originally Posted by ArtyMcFly
I'm not really sure what's going on in this thread, but I'm subscribing.
I don't have many subscribers, but each and every one of them is top 1% 2p2er.



It's not everyday that you get 10bet-bluffed in 2nlz:

Poker Stars $0.01/$0.02 No Limit Hold'em - 6 players
Hand History Converter

BTN: $2.32
SB: $2.14
Hero (BB): $2.16
UTG: $1.62
MP: $2.92
CO: $3.56

Pre Flop: ($0.03) Hero is BB with A K
3 folds, BTN raises to $0.04, 1 fold, Hero raises to $0.14, BTN calls $0.10

Flop: ($0.29) 2 K 6 (2 players)
Hero bets $0.13, BTN raises to $0.26, Hero raises to $0.39, BTN raises to $0.52, Hero raises to $0.65, BTN raises to $0.78, Hero raises to $0.91, BTN raises to $1.04, Hero raises to $1.17, BTN raises to $1.30, Hero raises to $1.43, BTN calls $0.13

Turn: ($3.15) 3 (2 players)
Hero bets $0.59 all in, BTN calls $0.59

River: ($4.33) A (2 players - 1 is all in)

Spoiler:
Final Pot: $4.33
BTN shows Ts Jc (high card Ace)
Hero shows Ah Ks (two pair, Aces and Kings)
Hero wins $4.18
(Rake: $0.15)


Spoiler:
Meme Hand no.2

Last edited by Knowl3dge; 03-19-2017 at 02:29 AM. Reason: typo
Showing you how it's done: a microstakes odyssey Quote
03-19-2017 , 04:34 AM
Hi mate, nice challenge and quite interested as I'm at same level trying the same as u do so I'll keep watching you and GL GL.

bdw, at the above hand, I would've just call his r-click on the flop so I can keep his bluffs in range and check/call on T and R (depending on the sizing). Not sure if I'm right but this is how I'd played .. a bit low variance. Even if I have info that he goes crazy with bluffs there I would've still just called his click and let him continue with all his bluffs.
Maybe will see an opinion from a more experienced player :P
[ now let me see the results ]
loool... TsJc.. now this was not expected but regardless, I still stand by what I've said.
Showing you how it's done: a microstakes odyssey Quote
03-19-2017 , 04:59 AM
Hey fellow Kiwi!

GL on the climb, i'm doing a similar start from micros back up after a few years away from poker. Hopefully see you @ 10nl/25nl soon.
Showing you how it's done: a microstakes odyssey Quote
03-20-2017 , 02:03 PM
I'm pretty sure that 10-bet/calling with JT on K62 is a losing play in the long run. Nice hand sir!
Showing you how it's done: a microstakes odyssey Quote
03-25-2017 , 12:00 AM
Quote:
Originally Posted by W.Eeyore
Hey fellow Kiwi!

GL on the climb, i'm doing a similar start from micros back up after a few years away from poker. Hopefully see you @ 10nl/25nl soon.
Quote:
Originally Posted by ArtyMcFly
I'm pretty sure that 10-bet/calling with JT on K62 is a losing play in the long run. Nice hand sir!

Thanks to both of you, I'm working hard to move up...


Third graph:


over last couple of days I've been studying a lot and I think making some pretty big progress theoretically. hopefully this is reflected in future graphs

in relation to actually playing, i think i've been doing well enough. I've had one session where I majorly spewed, and sometimes I go into a mode where I'm not thinking very clearly. However, I've been playing well relative to my knowl3dge overall. I think.
Showing you how it's done: a microstakes odyssey Quote
03-25-2017 , 12:08 AM
Quote:
Originally Posted by Sypk
Hi mate, nice challenge and quite interested as I'm at same level trying the same as u do so I'll keep watching you and GL GL.

bdw, at the above hand, I would've just call his r-click on the flop so I can keep his bluffs in range and check/call on T and R (depending on the sizing). Not sure if I'm right but this is how I'd played .. a bit low variance. Even if I have info that he goes crazy with bluffs there I would've still just called his click and let him continue with all his bluffs.
Maybe will see an opinion from a more experienced player :P
[ now let me see the results ]
loool... TsJc.. now this was not expected but regardless, I still stand by what I've said.
hey thanks for the gl and same to you. about the QQ hand, I think sometimes you just have to go with your feelings and do what feels right. theory goes out the window when instinct contradicts it.
Showing you how it's done: a microstakes odyssey Quote
03-25-2017 , 04:28 AM
nice upswing today:

played well and run well too for the most part . excepting the occasional cooler e.g.:

Poker Stars $0.01/$0.02 No Limit Hold'em - 6 players
Hand History Converter

BTN: $2.11
SB: $2.38
BB: $2.82
UTG: $0.78
MP: $1.24
Hero (CO): $2.50

Pre Flop: ($0.03) Hero is CO with 3 3
UTG calls $0.02, 1 fold, Hero calls $0.02, 2 folds, BB checks

Flop: ($0.07) 6 5 4 (3 players)
BB checks, UTG checks, Hero bets $0.02, BB folds, UTG calls $0.02

Turn: ($0.11) J (2 players)
UTG checks, Hero checks

River: ($0.11) A (2 players)
UTG checks, Hero checks

Spoiler:
Final Pot: $0.11
UTG shows 6d 6s (three of a kind, Sixes)
Hero mucks 3c 3d
UTG wins $0.11
(Rake: $0.00)


also, i won about 350 evbb today in pots that pokerstars didn't report.. will get pokerstars to email me my hands sometime in the future .
Showing you how it's done: a microstakes odyssey Quote
03-25-2017 , 06:41 PM
Poker Stars $0.01/$0.02 No Limit Hold'em - 6 players
Hand History Converter

BTN: $2.52
Hero (SB): $3.10
BB: $2.00
UTG: $2.09
MP: $2.00
CO: $2.55

Pre Flop: ($0.03) Hero is SB with J J
3 folds, BTN raises to $0.04, Hero raises to $0.14, 1 fold, BTN raises to $0.34, Hero calls $0.20

Flop: ($0.70) J 8 9 (2 players)
Hero checks, BTN bets $0.60, Hero raises to $2.76 all in, BTN calls $1.58 all in

Turn: ($5.06) T (2 players - 2 are all in)

River: ($5.06) 7 (2 players - 2 are all in)

Spoiler:
Final Pot: $5.06
BTN shows Tc 7d (a straight, Seven to Jack)
Hero shows Jh Jd (a straight, Seven to Jack)
Hero wins $2.44
BTN wins $2.44
(Rake: $0.18)



but results aside do you guys think shove is good on flop? Or call better? had 0 hands on him

*actually im 99.9% sure shove is gee tee oh
Showing you how it's done: a microstakes odyssey Quote
03-26-2017 , 10:28 AM
People are 4-betting T7o at 2NL?
Check-shove is fine vs villain's sizing, as he's repping QQ+, and there are a few bad turn cards for that range if you just call, so getting it in immediately should be very profitable in the long run.
Showing you how it's done: a microstakes odyssey Quote
03-27-2017 , 01:50 AM
Quote:
Originally Posted by ArtyMcFly
People are 4-betting T7o at 2NL?
...
knowl3dge theorm: if a game state is possible, 2nl players can achieve it.

It follows that in any given situation a 2nl player will have all technically possible combos at a non-0 frequency... wasn't exactly expecting this though

Quote:
Originally Posted by ArtyMcFly
...
Check-shove is fine vs villain's sizing, as he's repping QQ+, and there are a few bad turn cards for that range if you just call, so getting it in immediately should be very profitable in the long run.
thanks for comment.

mini update on the challenge: studying is going really well. learning a lot every day. will post next graph at 30k hands, 6k to go .
Showing you how it's done: a microstakes odyssey Quote

      
m