Open Side Menu Go to the Top
Register
rapidesh123, the legend is back rapidesh123, the legend is back

08-02-2019 , 12:23 PM
better question is what u have on that QJTxx board BTNvBB ?
08-02-2019 , 01:01 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by Rapidesh123
Really? With the 9 otr I don't see many villains valuebetting Qx/kk/AA, so that was the main reason I called
You have a lot of TP's in your range, in general people under bluff when trips is a very relevant part of your range
08-02-2019 , 07:56 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by Knoblis14
better question is what u have on that QJTxx board BTNvBB ?
I was buttonclicking at max speed vs you in there, did you have AK? You have 70 wwsf and 70 wsd in my sample, so tilting lol

Quote:
Originally Posted by bbissick
You have a lot of TP's in your range, in general people under bluff when trips is a very relevant part of your range
It makes sense, tbh I always overfolded in that spot but decided to call in there recently, even if he bluffs all his gutshots he will probably have enough bluffing combos, but he will have to be bluffing with a lot of them too, also he has few offsuited broadways in there pre-flop.
08-02-2019 , 08:28 PM
i wouldn't have guessed that board was underbluffed, very interesting. I also think it's an easy fold with 88.
08-02-2019 , 10:02 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by Stroggoz
i wouldn't have guessed that board was underbluffed, very interesting. I also think it's an easy fold with 88.
88 is a better call than all Qx if villain is valuebetting trips+
08-03-2019 , 01:54 AM
I was buttonclicking at max speed vs you in there, did you have AK? You have 70 wwsf and 70 wsd in my sample, so tilting lol


lol now i know why iam loosing, no i have way better hand i turned quads.
Sorry that i sunrun vs u.
08-03-2019 , 10:03 AM
yeah agree h3 is severely underbluffed ez fold

same with h1

quitting poker/stressful things while attempting to quit smoking is the only reasonable thing i've ever seen you post on this website, gl.
08-03-2019 , 05:32 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by Rapidesh123
Results


I decided to just quit smoking after that. Obv I had plans to already quit that ****, but doing it is another thing, our brains get so addicted to nicotine that it's very hard to quit it, it's more addictive than cocaine, right?


[/SPOIL]
Nicotine gum did wonders for me and am a guy who thought i will never quit smoking. Have been without that **** for 28 month.
08-03-2019 , 05:49 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by Knoblis14
better question is what u have on that QJTxx board BTNvBB ?
hand history for this one?
08-04-2019 , 03:14 AM
    Poker Stars, $0.50/$1 No Limit Hold'em Cash, 6 Players
    Poker Tools Powered By Holdem Manager - The Ultimate Poker Software Suite.

    SB: $104.10 (104.1 bb)
    BB: $100 (100 bb)
    UTG: $205.15 (205.2 bb)
    MP: $222.15 (222.2 bb)
    CO: $100 (100 bb)
    Hero (BTN): $102.27 (102.3 bb)

    Preflop: Hero is BTN with T T
    3 folds, Hero raises to $2.50, SB folds, BB calls $1.50

    Flop: ($5.50) Q J T (2 players)
    BB checks, Hero bets $1.72, BB calls $1.72

    Turn: ($8.94) T (2 players)
    BB bets $2.12, Hero raises to $12.05, BB raises to $36, Hero calls $23.95

    River: ($80.94) 5 (2 players)
    BB checks, Hero bets $62.05 and is all-in, BB folds

    Spoiler:
    Results: $80.94 pot ($2.50 rake)
    Final Board: Q J T T 5
    BB mucked and lost (-$40.22 net)
    Hero mucked T T and won $78.44 ($38.22 net)
    08-04-2019 , 05:51 AM
    Isn’t QJT a quintessential big polarised cbet board where you push nut advantage and bluff aggressively because opponent can’t raise you?
    08-05-2019 , 06:05 PM
    who knows iam fun player
    08-06-2019 , 08:00 AM
    Quote:
    Originally Posted by Knoblis14
    who knows iam fun player
    Betting small with a big part of our range is ok there vs pretty much anyone. Our range isn't really all that polarized on that board and if we intentionally polarize ourselves too much on the flop, our checking range becomes way too weak and exploitable.
    08-06-2019 , 08:19 AM
    Are there actually boards SRP btn v BB in which larger sizing than 33% actually yields significantly more EV in equilibrium?
    08-06-2019 , 08:26 AM
    define significantly.

    IMO yes there are.
    08-06-2019 , 08:29 AM
    yes
    08-06-2019 , 08:41 AM
    if you don't overbet flop with AK on a board like AK6 BTNvsBB you're making a mistake
    08-06-2019 , 10:03 AM
    Cheers guys, only compared 33 vs 75 before without seeing big differences but didn't expect overbets to differ so much. Pretty costly mistake indeed
    08-06-2019 , 02:15 PM
    Quote:
    Originally Posted by Xenoblade
    if you don't overbet flop with AK on a board like AK6 BTNvsBB you're making a mistake
    I don't agree with that, imo it's fine to range w 33% as long as you are 2x potting most turns.
    08-06-2019 , 02:18 PM
    Quote:
    Originally Posted by Rapidesh123
    I don't agree with that, imo it's fine to range w 33% as long as you are 2x potting most turns.
    plug it in pio you’ll see for yourself, otherwise we could argue any sizing is fine on flop on any texture
    08-06-2019 , 03:14 PM
    Quote:
    Originally Posted by Xenoblade
    plug it in pio you’ll see for yourself, otherwise we could argue any sizing is fine on flop on any texture
    I haven't sim that, gonna take a look at it
    08-06-2019 , 03:24 PM
    Still watching, still vamoooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooo
    08-06-2019 , 04:07 PM
    Quote:
    Originally Posted by Rapidesh123
    I don't agree with that, imo it's fine to range w 33% as long as you are 2x potting most turns.
    Alright rapi, assuming equilibrium defending ranges for one of 2x, 2.5x, or 3x btn 40% rfi (in a high rake environment like the games you play), what is difference in EV for btn cbetting range for 33% or using a mixed strategy of checking, betting 33% and overbetting?

    You say its fine sooo how much EV is btn giving up? You can choose whichever rfi sizing and you can change 40% open to something else if you want to.
    08-06-2019 , 04:17 PM
    is 40% rfi otb actually standard? I see it thrown around a lot but it's hard for me to come up with a button opening range that contains less than 50% of hands.
    08-06-2019 , 04:32 PM
    Quote:
    Originally Posted by tgiggity
    is 40% rfi otb actually standard? I see it thrown around a lot but it's hard for me to come up with a button opening range that contains less than 50% of hands.
    Exclude offsuit trash like 87o or K8o

          
    m